Stapokibart (CM310) in patients with uncontrolled seasonal allergic rhinitis (PHECDA): Rationale and design of a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

IF 2.1 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000174
Menglin Wang, Yuan Zhang, Jingyun Li, Chengshuo Wang, Luo Zhang
{"title":"Stapokibart (CM310) in patients with uncontrolled seasonal allergic rhinitis (PHECDA): Rationale and design of a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"Menglin Wang, Yuan Zhang, Jingyun Li, Chengshuo Wang, Luo Zhang","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a global health issue, and the current standard of care (SoC) has limited effectiveness in controlling the disease. There is a need for innovative treatments to better manage uncontrolled SAR and advance beyond the uniform SoC, and biologics targeting type 2 inflammation driving allergic rhinitis is promising.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Stapokibart, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha, as an add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled SAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PHECDA is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Stapokibart in treating uncontrolled SAR in adults. Conducted across 18 centers in China during the pollen season, the study plans to recruit 108 adult patients with moderate to severe nasal symptoms despite receiving SoC during the previous seasonal pollen period, along with a 1-week run-in period and a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells·μL<sup>-1</sup>. The study consists of a screening/run-in period (1 week), treatment period (4 weeks), and follow-up period (8 weeks). In addition to SoC, which includes mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine, participants are randomly assigned using a centralized interactive-web-response-system to receive either subcutaneous Stapokibart 600 (loading dose)-300 mg or a placebo every 2 weeks for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is the mean change from baseline in the daily reflective total nasal symptom score over the first 2 weeks of treatment. Subjects who have been administered at least 1 dose of the investigational drug will be included in the assessments of both efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This article outlines the methodology utilized in a multicenter trial studying Stapokibar for seasonal allergic rhinitis, with expectations to discuss its significant effects in subsequent analyses based on trial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PHECDA study is for the first time to provide insight into the efficacy and safety of a seasonal add-on Stapokibart for patients with uncontrolled SAR during pollen exposure.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05908032.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"15 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a global health issue, and the current standard of care (SoC) has limited effectiveness in controlling the disease. There is a need for innovative treatments to better manage uncontrolled SAR and advance beyond the uniform SoC, and biologics targeting type 2 inflammation driving allergic rhinitis is promising.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Stapokibart, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 receptor subunit alpha, as an add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled SAR.

Methods: The PHECDA is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Stapokibart in treating uncontrolled SAR in adults. Conducted across 18 centers in China during the pollen season, the study plans to recruit 108 adult patients with moderate to severe nasal symptoms despite receiving SoC during the previous seasonal pollen period, along with a 1-week run-in period and a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells·μL-1. The study consists of a screening/run-in period (1 week), treatment period (4 weeks), and follow-up period (8 weeks). In addition to SoC, which includes mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine, participants are randomly assigned using a centralized interactive-web-response-system to receive either subcutaneous Stapokibart 600 (loading dose)-300 mg or a placebo every 2 weeks for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is the mean change from baseline in the daily reflective total nasal symptom score over the first 2 weeks of treatment. Subjects who have been administered at least 1 dose of the investigational drug will be included in the assessments of both efficacy and safety.

Results: This article outlines the methodology utilized in a multicenter trial studying Stapokibar for seasonal allergic rhinitis, with expectations to discuss its significant effects in subsequent analyses based on trial outcomes.

Conclusion: The PHECDA study is for the first time to provide insight into the efficacy and safety of a seasonal add-on Stapokibart for patients with uncontrolled SAR during pollen exposure.

Trial registration: NCT05908032.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stapokibart (CM310)用于不受控制的季节性变应性鼻炎(PHECDA)患者:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的基本原理和设计。
背景:季节性变应性鼻炎(SAR)是一个全球性的健康问题,目前的护理标准(SoC)在控制疾病方面的效果有限。需要创新的治疗方法来更好地控制不受控制的SAR,并超越统一的SoC,针对2型炎症驱动的变应性鼻炎的生物制剂是有希望的。目的:评价Stapokibart(一种靶向白细胞介素-4受体亚单位α的人源化单克隆抗体)作为非控制型sars患者附加治疗的疗效和安全性。方法:PHECDA是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期临床研究,旨在评价Stapokibart治疗非控制型成人SAR的疗效和安全性。该研究于花粉季节在中国的18个中心进行,计划招募108名中度至重度鼻症状的成年患者,尽管在上一个季节性花粉季节接受了SoC,并且有1周的磨合期,基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数至少为300个细胞·μL-1。研究包括筛选/磨合期(1周)、治疗期(4周)和随访期(8周)。除了SoC,包括糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂和氯雷他定,参与者被随机分配使用一个集中的互动网络反应系统,接受皮下Stapokibart 600(负荷剂量)-300 mg或安慰剂,每2周一次,持续4周。该研究的主要终点是治疗前两周每日反射性总鼻症状评分与基线相比的平均变化。已服用至少1剂研究药物的受试者将被纳入疗效和安全性评估。结果:本文概述了在一项研究Stapokibar治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的多中心试验中使用的方法,并期望在基于试验结果的后续分析中讨论其显著效果。结论:PHECDA研究首次揭示了季节性附加Stapokibart对花粉暴露期间不受控制的SAR患者的有效性和安全性。试验注册:NCT05908032。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and biomarker screening for dry nose. A systematic review of tick removal techniques: Relationship to outcomes of tick-induced allergic reactions and tick-borne illnesses. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin can be lost (and gained): Skin test resensitization following prolonged oral provocation test. Examining the diagnostic validity of the ISAAC asthma questionnaire among participants from Singapore and Malaysia. First report of euglena-induced anaphylaxis: A case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1