Mehdi Farokhnia, John Tazare, Claire L Pince, Nicolaus Bruns Vi, Joshua C Gray, Vincent Lo Re Iii, David A Fiellin, Henry R Kranzler, George F Koob, Amy C Justice, Leandro F Vendruscolo, Christopher T Rentsch, Lorenzo Leggio
{"title":"Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists but not dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors reduce alcohol intake.","authors":"Mehdi Farokhnia, John Tazare, Claire L Pince, Nicolaus Bruns Vi, Joshua C Gray, Vincent Lo Re Iii, David A Fiellin, Henry R Kranzler, George F Koob, Amy C Justice, Leandro F Vendruscolo, Christopher T Rentsch, Lorenzo Leggio","doi":"10.1172/JCI188314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite growing preclinical evidence that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) could be repurposed to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD), clinical evidence is scarce. Additionally, the potential impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) on alcohol intake is largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a large cohort study using 2008-2023 electronic health records data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Changes in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores were compared between propensity-score-matched GLP-1RA recipients, DPP-4I recipients, and unexposed comparators. We further tested the effects of two DPP-4Is, linagliptin and omarigliptin, on binge-like alcohol drinking in mice and operant oral alcohol self-administration in alcohol-dependent rats, models previously used to show a significant effect of the GLP-1RA semaglutide in reducing alcohol intake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GLP-1RA recipients reported a greater reduction in AUDIT-C scores than unexposed individuals [difference-in-difference: 0.09(0.03,0.14), p=0.0025] and DPP-4I recipients [difference-in-difference: 0.11(0.05,0.17), p=0.0002]. Reductions in drinking were more pronounced among individuals with baseline AUD [GLP-1RA vs. unexposed: 0.51(0.29,0.72), p<0.0001; GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4I: 0.65(0.43,0.88), p<0.0001] and baseline hazardous drinking [GLP-1RA vs. unexposed: 1.38(1.07,1.69), p<0.0001; GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4I: 1.00(0.68,1.33), p<0.0001]. There were no differences between DPP-4I recipients and unexposed individuals. The latter results were confirmed via a reverse translational approach. Specifically, neither linagliptin nor omarigliptin reduced alcohol drinking in mice or rats. The rodent experiments also confirmed target engagement as both DPP-4Is reduced blood glucose levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Convergent findings across humans, mice, and rats indicate that GLP-1RAs but not DPP-4Is reduce alcohol consumption and may be efficacious in treating AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI188314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite growing preclinical evidence that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) could be repurposed to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD), clinical evidence is scarce. Additionally, the potential impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) on alcohol intake is largely unknown.
Methods: We conducted a large cohort study using 2008-2023 electronic health records data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Changes in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores were compared between propensity-score-matched GLP-1RA recipients, DPP-4I recipients, and unexposed comparators. We further tested the effects of two DPP-4Is, linagliptin and omarigliptin, on binge-like alcohol drinking in mice and operant oral alcohol self-administration in alcohol-dependent rats, models previously used to show a significant effect of the GLP-1RA semaglutide in reducing alcohol intake.
Results: GLP-1RA recipients reported a greater reduction in AUDIT-C scores than unexposed individuals [difference-in-difference: 0.09(0.03,0.14), p=0.0025] and DPP-4I recipients [difference-in-difference: 0.11(0.05,0.17), p=0.0002]. Reductions in drinking were more pronounced among individuals with baseline AUD [GLP-1RA vs. unexposed: 0.51(0.29,0.72), p<0.0001; GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4I: 0.65(0.43,0.88), p<0.0001] and baseline hazardous drinking [GLP-1RA vs. unexposed: 1.38(1.07,1.69), p<0.0001; GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4I: 1.00(0.68,1.33), p<0.0001]. There were no differences between DPP-4I recipients and unexposed individuals. The latter results were confirmed via a reverse translational approach. Specifically, neither linagliptin nor omarigliptin reduced alcohol drinking in mice or rats. The rodent experiments also confirmed target engagement as both DPP-4Is reduced blood glucose levels.
Conclusion: Convergent findings across humans, mice, and rats indicate that GLP-1RAs but not DPP-4Is reduce alcohol consumption and may be efficacious in treating AUD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Investigation, established in 1924 by the ASCI, is a prestigious publication that focuses on breakthroughs in basic and clinical biomedical science, with the goal of advancing the field of medicine. With an impressive Impact Factor of 15.9 in 2022, it is recognized as one of the leading journals in the "Medicine, Research & Experimental" category of the Web of Science.
The journal attracts a diverse readership from various medical disciplines and sectors. It publishes a wide range of research articles encompassing all biomedical specialties, including Autoimmunity, Gastroenterology, Immunology, Metabolism, Nephrology, Neuroscience, Oncology, Pulmonology, Vascular Biology, and many others.
The Editorial Board consists of esteemed academic editors who possess extensive expertise in their respective fields. They are actively involved in research, ensuring the journal's high standards of publication and scientific rigor.