Prenatal predictors of ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement and adverse perinatal outcomes in newborns with open spina bifida.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.70063
Ezgi Başaran, Ecem Haliloğlu, Osman Onur Özkavak, Murat Haksever, Harun Demirci, Özgür Öcal, Atakan Tanaçan, Dilek Şahin
{"title":"Prenatal predictors of ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement and adverse perinatal outcomes in newborns with open spina bifida.","authors":"Ezgi Başaran, Ecem Haliloğlu, Osman Onur Özkavak, Murat Haksever, Harun Demirci, Özgür Öcal, Atakan Tanaçan, Dilek Şahin","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spina bifida is a group of anomalies that, while non-lethal, require careful prenatal evaluation and prognosis prediction due to their association with common motor and cognitive problems. In this study, we investigated the need for postnatal ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) in fetuses with open spina bifida and explored the relationship between adverse perinatal outcomes and prenatal ultrasonographic findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, fetuses with open spina bifida that were diagnosed prenatally and resulted in a live birth were examined. The fetuses were divided into two groups: those who required VPS and those who did not require VPS in the postnatal period, and their prenatal clinical characteristics (lateral ventricle [LV] width, defect size, and defect level) and postnatal results (Apgar scores, length of hospital stay, lower extremity motor functions, bladder dysfunction, and epilepsy) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prenatal LV width, defect size, presence of hindbrain herniation, and defect level were significantly different between the groups (all P < 0.05). Similarly, a significant difference was seen when comparing adverse neonatal outcomes; with worse outcomes observed in the group requiring VPS. It was observed that LV width, sac size and hindbrain herniation predicted the need for VPS in univariate analyses (P = 0.002, P = 0.013, P: 0.004, respectively). However, defect level had no predictive effect on VPS requirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Larger prenatal LV width and sac size were associated with an increased need for postnatal VPS and were effective in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Utilizing this information in prenatal counseling and pregnancy management may prove beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spina bifida is a group of anomalies that, while non-lethal, require careful prenatal evaluation and prognosis prediction due to their association with common motor and cognitive problems. In this study, we investigated the need for postnatal ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) in fetuses with open spina bifida and explored the relationship between adverse perinatal outcomes and prenatal ultrasonographic findings.

Methods: In this retrospective study, fetuses with open spina bifida that were diagnosed prenatally and resulted in a live birth were examined. The fetuses were divided into two groups: those who required VPS and those who did not require VPS in the postnatal period, and their prenatal clinical characteristics (lateral ventricle [LV] width, defect size, and defect level) and postnatal results (Apgar scores, length of hospital stay, lower extremity motor functions, bladder dysfunction, and epilepsy) were compared.

Results: Prenatal LV width, defect size, presence of hindbrain herniation, and defect level were significantly different between the groups (all P < 0.05). Similarly, a significant difference was seen when comparing adverse neonatal outcomes; with worse outcomes observed in the group requiring VPS. It was observed that LV width, sac size and hindbrain herniation predicted the need for VPS in univariate analyses (P = 0.002, P = 0.013, P: 0.004, respectively). However, defect level had no predictive effect on VPS requirement.

Conclusion: Larger prenatal LV width and sac size were associated with an increased need for postnatal VPS and were effective in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Utilizing this information in prenatal counseling and pregnancy management may prove beneficial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Prenatal predictors of ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement and adverse perinatal outcomes in newborns with open spina bifida. Stem cell theory: A new horizon for the treatment of endometriosis by targeting mesenchymal stem cell. Evaluating the impact of Hoopicoach: A digital health tool for supporting patients through gynecologic surgery. Letter to the editor: Vascular dysfunction in women with recurrent pregnancy loss-Possible association with antiphospholipid antibodies. Fertility after cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1