Inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices approved in the European Union.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-11-04 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf007
J J Coughlan, Robert A Byrne, Georgios C M Siontis, Laurna McGovern, Rory Durand, Anne Lübbeke, Arjola Bano, Alan G Fraser
{"title":"Inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices approved in the European Union.","authors":"J J Coughlan, Robert A Byrne, Georgios C M Siontis, Laurna McGovern, Rory Durand, Anne Lübbeke, Arjola Bano, Alan G Fraser","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adequate inclusion and representation of patients in clinical studies is critical for the generalizability of research findings. The aim of this analysis was to determine inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices (orthopaedic, diabetes, and cardiovascular) approved in the European Union.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an analysis of data from three co-ordinated systematic reviews of clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices. This analysis includes 641 studies, reporting on more than 1.9 million patients treated with high-risk orthopaedic, diabetes, and cardiovascular medical devices. The main outcomes were the proportions of studies providing data on the age, sex, and ethnicity of participants, and the performance of stratified analyses based on these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (>90%) of studies in all three device categories (orthopaedics, diabetes, and cardiovascular) provided data on the age and sex of participants, but only a minority (<10%) provided information on ethnicity. Female patients comprised over half of the patients in the included orthopaedic and diabetes device studies, but <40% of patients in the included cardiovascular device studies (P < 0.001). A minority of studies performed analyses stratified by age (14.6%) or sex (10.4%), although those were more frequently reported in randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost all studies in this analysis provided demographic data on age and sex, but only a small minority had analysed whether these factors had any impact on device performance. Very few studies provided information on the ethnicity of study participants. Cardiovascular device studies enrolled a lower proportion of female patients in comparison to orthopaedic and diabetes device studies.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Cardiovascular device systematic review: PROSPERO (CRD42022308593). Diabetes device systematic review: PROSPERO (CRD42022366871). Orthopaedic device systematic review: open science framework (https://osf.io/6gmyx).</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"962-968"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12587281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adequate inclusion and representation of patients in clinical studies is critical for the generalizability of research findings. The aim of this analysis was to determine inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices (orthopaedic, diabetes, and cardiovascular) approved in the European Union.

Methods: This is an analysis of data from three co-ordinated systematic reviews of clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices. This analysis includes 641 studies, reporting on more than 1.9 million patients treated with high-risk orthopaedic, diabetes, and cardiovascular medical devices. The main outcomes were the proportions of studies providing data on the age, sex, and ethnicity of participants, and the performance of stratified analyses based on these factors.

Results: The majority (>90%) of studies in all three device categories (orthopaedics, diabetes, and cardiovascular) provided data on the age and sex of participants, but only a minority (<10%) provided information on ethnicity. Female patients comprised over half of the patients in the included orthopaedic and diabetes device studies, but <40% of patients in the included cardiovascular device studies (P < 0.001). A minority of studies performed analyses stratified by age (14.6%) or sex (10.4%), although those were more frequently reported in randomized studies.

Conclusions: Almost all studies in this analysis provided demographic data on age and sex, but only a small minority had analysed whether these factors had any impact on device performance. Very few studies provided information on the ethnicity of study participants. Cardiovascular device studies enrolled a lower proportion of female patients in comparison to orthopaedic and diabetes device studies.

Study registration: Cardiovascular device systematic review: PROSPERO (CRD42022308593). Diabetes device systematic review: PROSPERO (CRD42022366871). Orthopaedic device systematic review: open science framework (https://osf.io/6gmyx).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧盟批准的高风险医疗器械临床研究中按年龄、性别和种族纳入和报告。
在临床研究中充分纳入和代表患者对研究结果的普遍性至关重要。本分析的目的是确定在欧洲联盟(EU)批准的高风险医疗器械(骨科、糖尿病和心血管)临床研究中按年龄、性别和种族纳入和报告情况。方法:这是对高风险医疗器械临床证据的三个协调系统评价数据的分析。该分析包括641项研究,报告了190多万接受高风险骨科、糖尿病和心血管医疗设备治疗的患者。主要结果是提供参与者年龄、性别和种族数据的研究的比例,以及基于这些因素的分层分析的表现。结果:所有三种器械类别(骨科、糖尿病和心血管)的大多数研究(>90%)提供了参与者的年龄和性别数据,但只有少数研究(结论:本分析中几乎所有研究都提供了年龄和性别的人口统计数据,但只有少数研究分析了这些因素是否对器械性能有任何影响。很少有研究提供了研究参与者的种族信息。与骨科和糖尿病器械研究相比,心血管器械研究纳入的女性患者比例较低。心血管设备系统评价:PROSPERO (CRD42022308593),糖尿病设备系统评价:PROSPERO (CRD42022366871)。骨科器械系统评价:开放科学框架(https://osf.io/6gmyx)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Five-year outcomes following catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of 51 182 patients from a real world cohort. Low-dose aspirin and risk of anaemia in older adults: insights from a Danish register-based cohort study. Quality of life effects of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis: results from the randomized CORAL trial. Treatment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is associated with discontinuation of oral lipid lowering therapy. Specialist services for cardiomyopathy: quality care requires diagnostic accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1