The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4
Yonghui Wu, Jiannan Xu, Kai Zhang, Yuanheng Huang, Jian Zhang, Huiguo Chen
{"title":"The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.","authors":"Yonghui Wu, Jiannan Xu, Kai Zhang, Yuanheng Huang, Jian Zhang, Huiguo Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, 194 patients were diagnosed with one or more GGNs by computed tomography (CT) scan and underwent preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscope surgery (VATS) wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. There were 226 nodules in all patients. We analyzed the 4-hook needle localization safety, complications, safe margin and localization depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-hook needle localizations success rate was 100% and didn't take place in displacement and dislodgment. The tumor margin distance is about 5-20 mm and all tumor margin was negative thorough final pathology result. 9 patients occurred small parenchymal hemorrhage, 13 patients occurred small pneumothorax and 8 patients occurred small hemoptysis, those complications needn't intervene or tackle and didn't affect surgery. Compared upper and middle lobe to lower lobe, localization time was 13.92 ± 4.6 min vs 13.66 ± 4.28 min respectively, p = 0.69, there was no significant statistical difference. Localization depth was 18.63 ± 7.8 mm vs 15.87 ± 8.52 mm respectively, p = 0.02, there were statistical differences, but the margin tumor distance was 5.16 ± 4.94 mm vs 4.93 ± 3.64 mm, p = 0.73 respectively, there was no statistical difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative 4-hook needle localization is safe and feasible for GGNs. Guided by 4-hook needle localization, wedge resection can ensure enough safe margins and patient was well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs).

Methods: From November 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, 194 patients were diagnosed with one or more GGNs by computed tomography (CT) scan and underwent preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscope surgery (VATS) wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. There were 226 nodules in all patients. We analyzed the 4-hook needle localization safety, complications, safe margin and localization depth.

Results: The 4-hook needle localizations success rate was 100% and didn't take place in displacement and dislodgment. The tumor margin distance is about 5-20 mm and all tumor margin was negative thorough final pathology result. 9 patients occurred small parenchymal hemorrhage, 13 patients occurred small pneumothorax and 8 patients occurred small hemoptysis, those complications needn't intervene or tackle and didn't affect surgery. Compared upper and middle lobe to lower lobe, localization time was 13.92 ± 4.6 min vs 13.66 ± 4.28 min respectively, p = 0.69, there was no significant statistical difference. Localization depth was 18.63 ± 7.8 mm vs 15.87 ± 8.52 mm respectively, p = 0.02, there were statistical differences, but the margin tumor distance was 5.16 ± 4.94 mm vs 4.93 ± 3.64 mm, p = 0.73 respectively, there was no statistical difference.

Conclusions: Preoperative 4-hook needle localization is safe and feasible for GGNs. Guided by 4-hook needle localization, wedge resection can ensure enough safe margins and patient was well tolerated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
An environmental scan of current mentorship: fostering the next generations in cardiothoracic surgery in the UK. Acquired ventricular septal defect secondary to aortic valve endocarditis. Multimodal imaging in the assessment of quadricuspid aortic valve. Abnormal arterial ligation alone for patients with anomalous systemic arterial supply to the left basal segment of the lung: three case series. The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1