Reliability of Self-monitoring of Intraocular Pressure with iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560
Dario Romano, Giovanni Montesano, Amir A Aminoleslami, Benedetta Colizzi, Luca M Rossetti
{"title":"Reliability of Self-monitoring of Intraocular Pressure with iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry.","authors":"Dario Romano, Giovanni Montesano, Amir A Aminoleslami, Benedetta Colizzi, Luca M Rossetti","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Using iCare Home2 (iCare, Finland) rebound tonometry, self-measurement of intraocular pressure has demonstrated good reliability and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate reliability and repeatability of self-measured intraocular pressure (IOP) with rebound tonometry using iCare Home2.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>104 patients out of 110 consecutive patients were recruited for this observational cross-sectional study. One randomly selected eye from each patient underwent six consecutive IOP measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), iCare IC200 and iCare Home2. Every eye was tested twice with each device, in random order, by an ophthalmologist for GAT and IC200, and by the patient itself for Home2. In addition, central corneal thickness (CCT) has been collected. Reliability of Home2 has been tested calculating Limits of Agreement (LoA) between self-measured and physician-measured IOP, using the Bland-Altman analysis. Repeatability of each device has been tested calculating Limits of Repeatability (LoR) with the same method. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between differences in IOP measurements and CCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference between GAT and iCare Home2 was -0.28±1.57 mm Hg (P=0.070), 95%-LoA: [-3.36, 2,79 mm Hg]. The mean difference between IC200 and iCare Home2 was 0.92±1.48 mm Hg (P<0.0001), 95%-LoA [-1.98, 3.82 mm Hg]. The mean difference between the first and second measurement with GAT, iCare IC200, and iCare Home2 measurements was 0.21±0.98 mm Hg (P=0.03), -0.02±1.11 mm Hg (P=0.88) and -0.23±1.04 mm Hg (P=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-measured IOP with rebound tonometry showed good reliability and repeatability when compared with physician-measured IOP with both standard GAT and rebound tonometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: Using iCare Home2 (iCare, Finland) rebound tonometry, self-measurement of intraocular pressure has demonstrated good reliability and ease of use.

Purpose: To investigate reliability and repeatability of self-measured intraocular pressure (IOP) with rebound tonometry using iCare Home2.

Patients and methods: 104 patients out of 110 consecutive patients were recruited for this observational cross-sectional study. One randomly selected eye from each patient underwent six consecutive IOP measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), iCare IC200 and iCare Home2. Every eye was tested twice with each device, in random order, by an ophthalmologist for GAT and IC200, and by the patient itself for Home2. In addition, central corneal thickness (CCT) has been collected. Reliability of Home2 has been tested calculating Limits of Agreement (LoA) between self-measured and physician-measured IOP, using the Bland-Altman analysis. Repeatability of each device has been tested calculating Limits of Repeatability (LoR) with the same method. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between differences in IOP measurements and CCT.

Results: The mean difference between GAT and iCare Home2 was -0.28±1.57 mm Hg (P=0.070), 95%-LoA: [-3.36, 2,79 mm Hg]. The mean difference between IC200 and iCare Home2 was 0.92±1.48 mm Hg (P<0.0001), 95%-LoA [-1.98, 3.82 mm Hg]. The mean difference between the first and second measurement with GAT, iCare IC200, and iCare Home2 measurements was 0.21±0.98 mm Hg (P=0.03), -0.02±1.11 mm Hg (P=0.88) and -0.23±1.04 mm Hg (P=0.05).

Conclusions: Self-measured IOP with rebound tonometry showed good reliability and repeatability when compared with physician-measured IOP with both standard GAT and rebound tonometry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Socioeconomic Factors and Neovascular Glaucoma in a United States Medicare Population. Reliability of Self-monitoring of Intraocular Pressure with iCare Home2 Rebound Tonometry. Development of a Computerized and Automated Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Application to Aid in Glaucoma Surgical Management. Intraocular Pressure Measurements With the Tono-Vera®, a new Handheld Rebound Tonometer. Telemedicine in Glaucoma Management: Patient Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1