Ryo Okuda, Tamiko Takemura, Toshihiro Misumi, Eri Hagiwara, Takashi Ogura
{"title":"Anti-chicken and anti-pigeon immunoglobulin G testing in patients with bird-related fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.","authors":"Ryo Okuda, Tamiko Takemura, Toshihiro Misumi, Eri Hagiwara, Takashi Ogura","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2025.113846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the inciting antigens for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is avian. It is controversial whether chickens are the inciting antigen of bird-related fibrotic HP; the anti-chicken immunoglobulin (Ig) G testing for bird-related fibrotic HP patients was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anti-pigeon IgG and anti-chicken IgG antibodies by mainly enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were measured in patients with bird-related fibrotic HP. We included bird-related fibrotic HP patients who had undergone histopathological examination and who had a positive inhalation challenge test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 44 patients with bird-related fibrotic HP and 48 with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases other than fibrotic HP. The mean titers of anti-pigeon IgG antibody by ELISA were 0.659 ± 0.381 and 0.494 ± 0.187 in the bird-related fibrotic HP and control groups, respectively (p = 0.012). Those of anti-chicken IgG antibody were 0.345 ± 0.189 and 0.376 ± 0.167, respectively (p = 0.457). No significant correlation was found between anti-pigeon IgG testing by ELISA and anti-chicken IgG testing (r = 0.45, p = 0.45). In patients with bird-related fibrotic HP, annual FVC changes were significantly different (p = 0.001), with the higher titer group improving by 0.4 % and the lower titer group decreasing by 4 %. Similarly, no significant differences in annual FVC changes were observed between the higher and lower anti-chicken IgG antibody titer groups among bird-related fibrotic HP patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum IgG testing for chicken serum was less effective in diagnosing or predicting the disease progression of bird-related fibrotic HP than that for pigeon serum.</p>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":" ","pages":"113846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2025.113846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: One of the inciting antigens for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is avian. It is controversial whether chickens are the inciting antigen of bird-related fibrotic HP; the anti-chicken immunoglobulin (Ig) G testing for bird-related fibrotic HP patients was investigated.
Methods: Anti-pigeon IgG and anti-chicken IgG antibodies by mainly enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were measured in patients with bird-related fibrotic HP. We included bird-related fibrotic HP patients who had undergone histopathological examination and who had a positive inhalation challenge test.
Results: We included 44 patients with bird-related fibrotic HP and 48 with fibrotic interstitial lung diseases other than fibrotic HP. The mean titers of anti-pigeon IgG antibody by ELISA were 0.659 ± 0.381 and 0.494 ± 0.187 in the bird-related fibrotic HP and control groups, respectively (p = 0.012). Those of anti-chicken IgG antibody were 0.345 ± 0.189 and 0.376 ± 0.167, respectively (p = 0.457). No significant correlation was found between anti-pigeon IgG testing by ELISA and anti-chicken IgG testing (r = 0.45, p = 0.45). In patients with bird-related fibrotic HP, annual FVC changes were significantly different (p = 0.001), with the higher titer group improving by 0.4 % and the lower titer group decreasing by 4 %. Similarly, no significant differences in annual FVC changes were observed between the higher and lower anti-chicken IgG antibody titer groups among bird-related fibrotic HP patients.
Conclusion: Serum IgG testing for chicken serum was less effective in diagnosing or predicting the disease progression of bird-related fibrotic HP than that for pigeon serum.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.