Demographics and Trends in Outpatient Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer: 2016-2021.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1198
Jason H Lee, Jamie W Lewis, James D Warren, Alia Tayara, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Anne C Kane
{"title":"Demographics and Trends in Outpatient Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer: 2016-2021.","authors":"Jason H Lee, Jamie W Lewis, James D Warren, Alia Tayara, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Anne C Kane","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the utilization patterns of outpatient laryngoscopic excision procedures for laryngeal cancer in the United States, examining procedural costs and patient demographics to identify disparities in healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Ambulatory Surgery Sample database of major ambulatory surgeries in the United States, 2016-2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Encounters for endoscopic resection of laryngeal cancers were identified focusing on patient demographics and procedural costs. Analysis was performed regarding trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11,371 encounters in 2016-2021, patients were mostly male (82.6%), White (75.3%), and living in metropolitan areas with greater than 1 million residents (54.1%), with an even distribution between income quartiles. Predictors of utilization at urban teaching hospitals progressively decreased in patients residing in smaller metropolitan areas (250-999,000 residents (odds ratio [OR] = 0.451, P ≤ .0001) and 50-249,000 residents (OR = 0.193, P ≤ .0001). Higher utilization was found in non-White patients (Black [OR = 1.673, P = .0075], Hispanic [OR = 1.752, P = .0118]), and those with patients with higher income (2nd quartile [OR = 1.411, P = .0058], 3rd quartile [OR = 2.017, P ≤ .0001], and 4th quartile [OR = 4.422, P < .0001]). These findings were consistent on multivariate analysis, however belonging to a racial minority lost significance (Black patients [P = .0508], Hispanic [P = .3008]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are existing disparities in endoscopic resection of laryngeal cancers. Our findings add to the literature underscoring the importance of expanding access to minimally invasive laryngeal preserving surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the utilization patterns of outpatient laryngoscopic excision procedures for laryngeal cancer in the United States, examining procedural costs and patient demographics to identify disparities in healthcare access.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: National Ambulatory Surgery Sample database of major ambulatory surgeries in the United States, 2016-2021.

Methods: Encounters for endoscopic resection of laryngeal cancers were identified focusing on patient demographics and procedural costs. Analysis was performed regarding trends over time.

Results: Of 11,371 encounters in 2016-2021, patients were mostly male (82.6%), White (75.3%), and living in metropolitan areas with greater than 1 million residents (54.1%), with an even distribution between income quartiles. Predictors of utilization at urban teaching hospitals progressively decreased in patients residing in smaller metropolitan areas (250-999,000 residents (odds ratio [OR] = 0.451, P ≤ .0001) and 50-249,000 residents (OR = 0.193, P ≤ .0001). Higher utilization was found in non-White patients (Black [OR = 1.673, P = .0075], Hispanic [OR = 1.752, P = .0118]), and those with patients with higher income (2nd quartile [OR = 1.411, P = .0058], 3rd quartile [OR = 2.017, P ≤ .0001], and 4th quartile [OR = 4.422, P < .0001]). These findings were consistent on multivariate analysis, however belonging to a racial minority lost significance (Black patients [P = .0508], Hispanic [P = .3008]).

Conclusion: There are existing disparities in endoscopic resection of laryngeal cancers. Our findings add to the literature underscoring the importance of expanding access to minimally invasive laryngeal preserving surgical treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Preservation Palatopharyngoplasty for Obstructive Sleep Apnea With High Modified Mallampati Scores: Clinical and Polysomnographic Outcomes. Speech Delay and Hearing Rehabilitation Disparities in Children With Hearing Loss. Speech Performance Following Intraoperative Correction of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Tip Fold-Overs. Trends in Complications of Pediatric Rhinosinusitis Before and During the COVID-19 Era. Using Creative Activities to Improve the Postoperative Experience of Adult Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1