Mechanical Thrombectomy in Prestroke Disability: Data From the Italian Endovascular Stroke Registry.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048997
Andrea Naldi, Federico D'Agata, Giovanni Pracucci, Valentina Saia, Roberto Cavallo, Davide Castellano, Fabrizio Sallustio, Ilaria Casetta, Enrico Fainardi, Valerio Da Ros, Ilaria Maestrini, Sergio Lucio Vinci, Paolino La Spina, Nicola Limbucci, Patrizia Nencini, Elvis Lafe, Marco Longoni, Sandra Bracco, Rossana Tassi, Stefano Vallone, Guido Bigliardi, Paolo Cerrato, Lucio Castellan, Massimo Del Sette, Roberto Menozzi, Alessandro Pezzini, Stefano Merolla, Stefano Forlivesi, Sergio Nappini, Nicola Davide Loizzo, Andrea Saletti, Cristiano Azzini, Guido Andrea Lazzarotti, Nicola Giannini, Daniele Giuseppe Romano, Rosa Napoletano, Nicola Burdi, Giovanni Boero, Alessio Comai, Elisa Dall'Ora, Nicola Cavasin, Adriana Critelli, Mauro Plebani, Manuel Cappellari, Domenico Sergio Zimatore, Marco Petruzzellis, Francesco Biraschi, Ettore Nicolini, Antioco Sanna, Tiziana Tassinari, Edoardo Puglielli, Alfonsina Casalena, Ivan Gallesio, Delfina Ferrandi, Pietro Filauri, Simona Sacco, Adriana Paladini, Annalisa Rizzo, Michele Besana, Alessia Giossi, Marco Pavia, Paolo Invernizzi, Pietro Amistà, Monia Russo, Marco Filizzolo, Marina Mannino, Gianluca Galvano, Eleonora Lidia Saracco, Mauro Bergui, Salvatore Mangiafico, Danilo Toni
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy in Prestroke Disability: Data From the Italian Endovascular Stroke Registry.","authors":"Andrea Naldi, Federico D'Agata, Giovanni Pracucci, Valentina Saia, Roberto Cavallo, Davide Castellano, Fabrizio Sallustio, Ilaria Casetta, Enrico Fainardi, Valerio Da Ros, Ilaria Maestrini, Sergio Lucio Vinci, Paolino La Spina, Nicola Limbucci, Patrizia Nencini, Elvis Lafe, Marco Longoni, Sandra Bracco, Rossana Tassi, Stefano Vallone, Guido Bigliardi, Paolo Cerrato, Lucio Castellan, Massimo Del Sette, Roberto Menozzi, Alessandro Pezzini, Stefano Merolla, Stefano Forlivesi, Sergio Nappini, Nicola Davide Loizzo, Andrea Saletti, Cristiano Azzini, Guido Andrea Lazzarotti, Nicola Giannini, Daniele Giuseppe Romano, Rosa Napoletano, Nicola Burdi, Giovanni Boero, Alessio Comai, Elisa Dall'Ora, Nicola Cavasin, Adriana Critelli, Mauro Plebani, Manuel Cappellari, Domenico Sergio Zimatore, Marco Petruzzellis, Francesco Biraschi, Ettore Nicolini, Antioco Sanna, Tiziana Tassinari, Edoardo Puglielli, Alfonsina Casalena, Ivan Gallesio, Delfina Ferrandi, Pietro Filauri, Simona Sacco, Adriana Paladini, Annalisa Rizzo, Michele Besana, Alessia Giossi, Marco Pavia, Paolo Invernizzi, Pietro Amistà, Monia Russo, Marco Filizzolo, Marina Mannino, Gianluca Galvano, Eleonora Lidia Saracco, Mauro Bergui, Salvatore Mangiafico, Danilo Toni","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefits and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with prestroke disability, classified as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3 to 4, and anterior circulation stroke remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate these factors using data from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data collected between 2015 and 2021, comparing functional outcomes (mRS), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) at 90 days post-MT in patients with prestroke mRS score of 3 to 4 versus 0 to 2. A good outcome was defined as no change in the mRS score from baseline. Subgroup analysis was stratified by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11.411 (96%) patients with prestroke mRS score of 0 to 2 and 477 (4%) patients with prestroke mRS score of 3 to 4 were included. Compared with patients with a baseline mRS score 0 to 2, those with mRS score 3 to 4 were older (82 versus 75 years; <i>P</i><0.001) and predominantly female (71.7% versus 53%; <i>P</i><0.001). The maintenance of the same mRS score after MT was observed in 100 (23.3%) patients with prestroke mRS score 3 to 4, compared with 2332 (22.1%) patients with mRS score 0 to 2 (<i>P</i>=0.556). Mortality was significantly higher in the mRS score 3 to 4 group (n=159 [37.1%] versus n=1939 [18.4%]; <i>P</i><0.001). Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) was lower in the mRS score 3 to 4 group (n=333 [71.6%] versus n=8706 [77.7%]; <i>P</i>=0.002), while no significant differences in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were found. The benefit of MT was maintained in patients aged 80 to 85 and over 85 years with prestroke mRS score 3 to 4, although mortality remained higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that prestroke disability does not imply less chance of returning to prestroke conditions after MT, even in octogenarians, despite higher mortality and lower recanalization rate. More data are warranted to better understand the benefit of MT in this subgroup of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"850-857"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The benefits and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with prestroke disability, classified as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3 to 4, and anterior circulation stroke remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate these factors using data from the Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke.

Methods: We analyzed data collected between 2015 and 2021, comparing functional outcomes (mRS), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and recanalization rates (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) at 90 days post-MT in patients with prestroke mRS score of 3 to 4 versus 0 to 2. A good outcome was defined as no change in the mRS score from baseline. Subgroup analysis was stratified by age.

Results: A total of 11.411 (96%) patients with prestroke mRS score of 0 to 2 and 477 (4%) patients with prestroke mRS score of 3 to 4 were included. Compared with patients with a baseline mRS score 0 to 2, those with mRS score 3 to 4 were older (82 versus 75 years; P<0.001) and predominantly female (71.7% versus 53%; P<0.001). The maintenance of the same mRS score after MT was observed in 100 (23.3%) patients with prestroke mRS score 3 to 4, compared with 2332 (22.1%) patients with mRS score 0 to 2 (P=0.556). Mortality was significantly higher in the mRS score 3 to 4 group (n=159 [37.1%] versus n=1939 [18.4%]; P<0.001). Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) was lower in the mRS score 3 to 4 group (n=333 [71.6%] versus n=8706 [77.7%]; P=0.002), while no significant differences in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were found. The benefit of MT was maintained in patients aged 80 to 85 and over 85 years with prestroke mRS score 3 to 4, although mortality remained higher.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that prestroke disability does not imply less chance of returning to prestroke conditions after MT, even in octogenarians, despite higher mortality and lower recanalization rate. More data are warranted to better understand the benefit of MT in this subgroup of patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械取栓治疗卒中前残疾:来自意大利血管内卒中登记的数据。
背景:机械取栓术(MT)对卒中前残疾(mRS评分为3 - 4分)和前循环卒中患者的益处和安全性仍不确定。本研究旨在利用意大利急性卒中血管内治疗登记处的数据来评估这些因素。方法:我们分析了2015年至2021年间收集的数据,比较了脑卒中前mRS评分为3至4分与0至2分的患者在mt后90天的功能结局(mRS)、症状性脑出血和再通率(脑梗死溶栓)。良好的结果被定义为mRS评分从基线没有变化。亚组分析按年龄分层。结果:共纳入mRS评分为0 ~ 2分的患者11.411例(96%),mRS评分为3 ~ 4分的患者477例(4%)。与基线mRS评分为0 - 2的患者相比,mRS评分为3 - 4的患者年龄较大(82岁对75岁;购买力平价= 0.556)。mRS评分3 ~ 4分组死亡率显著高于对照组(n=159 [37.1%] vs . n=1939 [18.4%];PP=0.002),而症状性脑出血无显著差异。在80 - 85岁和85岁以上卒中前mRS评分为3 - 4的患者中,MT的益处保持不变,尽管死亡率仍然较高。结论:我们的数据表明,脑卒中前残疾并不意味着脑卒中后恢复到脑卒中前状态的机会更少,即使是在80多岁的老年人中,尽管死亡率更高,再通率更低。为了更好地了解MT在这一亚组患者中的益处,需要更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Current Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. Predisposing Factors, Pathologies, and Precipitating Factors Causing Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Balancing Innovation and Responsibility: Ethical and Privacy Challenges in Stroke Digital Health. Toward AI-Powered Neurovascular Intervention: From Imaging to XR-Robotic Convergence. Preservation of Septo-Hippocampal Theta Oscillations via Cholinergic Protection Underlies Cognitive Recovery After Physical Exercise Post-Cardiac Arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1