Turkish validity and reliability study of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.

Hamdiye Banu Katran, Nurgül Arpag, Fatma Eti Aslan, Fethi Gül
{"title":"Turkish validity and reliability study of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.","authors":"Hamdiye Banu Katran, Nurgül Arpag, Fatma Eti Aslan, Fethi Gül","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.73814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted methodologically to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale and to assess its suitability for the Turkish population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological validity and reliability study collected data from 148 patients who underwent elective surgery with regional anesthesia in the general surgery clinics of a university hospital in Istanbul between May 2022 – October 2022. Data were obtained through face-to-face interviews with patients using the Patient Information Form, developed by the researchers based on the literature, and the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale, originally created in Swedish. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Amos 26 was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The content validity index of the scale was determined to be 0.96. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale was acceptably compatible with the original scale. The adapted Turkish version was found to have a comprehensible language structure and appropriate content. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score was α=0.839, indicating a high level of reliability. Consequently, the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale was determined to be valid, reliable, and stable over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Turkish population for assessing the sense of safety in patients undergoing elective surgery with regional anesthesia in surgical units.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 3","pages":"226-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.73814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted methodologically to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale and to assess its suitability for the Turkish population.

Methods: This methodological validity and reliability study collected data from 148 patients who underwent elective surgery with regional anesthesia in the general surgery clinics of a university hospital in Istanbul between May 2022 – October 2022. Data were obtained through face-to-face interviews with patients using the Patient Information Form, developed by the researchers based on the literature, and the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale, originally created in Swedish. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Amos 26 was used for data analysis.

Results: The content validity index of the scale was determined to be 0.96. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale was acceptably compatible with the original scale. The adapted Turkish version was found to have a comprehensible language structure and appropriate content. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score was α=0.839, indicating a high level of reliability. Consequently, the Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale was determined to be valid, reliable, and stable over time.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Turkish population for assessing the sense of safety in patients undergoing elective surgery with regional anesthesia in surgical units.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术时感觉安全量表土耳其语效度与信度研究。
背景:本研究采用方法学方法评估手术过程中感觉安全量表在土耳其的有效性和可靠性,并评估其对土耳其人群的适用性。方法:本方法学效度和信度研究收集了2021年12月1日至2022年6月30日在伊斯坦布尔一所大学医院普外科诊所接受区域麻醉选择性手术的148例患者的数据。数据是通过使用患者信息表(由研究人员根据文献开发)和土耳其版手术期间感觉安全量表(最初由瑞典语创建)与患者进行面对面访谈获得的。使用社会科学统计软件包Amos 26进行数据分析。结果:确定量表的内容效度指数为0.96。验证性因子分析表明,土耳其版手术期间感觉安全量表与原始量表可接受地兼容。经改编的土耳其语版本具有可理解的语言结构和适当的内容。总分的Cronbach’s alpha系数为α=0.839,信度较高。因此,土耳其版本的手术期间感觉安全量表被确定为有效、可靠和稳定的。结论:土耳其版手术时安全感量表是一种有效可靠的工具,可用于土耳其人群在外科单位进行区域麻醉择期手术患者的安全感评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostic significance of radiographically detected arterial calcification in geriatric hip fracture patients: Abdominal aortic calcification as an independent predictor of mortality. The effect of blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/albumin ratio in evaluating mortality in pediatric burn patients with 20% or greater total body surface area involvement. Temporary hemodynamic response with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a case of traumatic cardiac arrest. Prophylactic chorioretinectomy in deadly weapon-related open globe injuries. The role of the C-reactive protein to lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1