Gypsum as a Feedstock for Low-Cost, Decarbonized Portland Cement and Sulfuric Acid

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c08838
Samuel J. Faucher, Matthew R. Shaner, Stefan T. Omelchenko, Galit Anikeeva, Ian S. McKay
{"title":"Gypsum as a Feedstock for Low-Cost, Decarbonized Portland Cement and Sulfuric Acid","authors":"Samuel J. Faucher, Matthew R. Shaner, Stefan T. Omelchenko, Galit Anikeeva, Ian S. McKay","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c08838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production methods for cement and sulfuric acid are likely to change in the era of decarbonization. Cement is responsible for 8% of world carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions and urgently needs to be decarbonized, while sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) is produced from elemental sulfur, a fossil fuel byproduct whose supply may dwindle over time. Here, we perform a technoeconomic analysis of processes to coproduce Portland cement and sulfuric acid from gypsum via fossil-free variations of the once-prevalent Müller–Kühne (MK) process. With credit for coproduced sulfuric acid, a sulfur-driven variant of the MK process could achieve cost parity with limestone-derived cement ($40/t clinker) with dramatic (95–99%) reductions in the emission intensity. While MK process variants would saturate sulfuric acid markets well before they dominate world cement demand, these processes could simultaneously support a circular sulfur economy through valorization of gypsum waste and constitute a pathway to cost-effective decarbonized cement from a limestone-free feedstock.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"19 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c08838","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Production methods for cement and sulfuric acid are likely to change in the era of decarbonization. Cement is responsible for 8% of world carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urgently needs to be decarbonized, while sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is produced from elemental sulfur, a fossil fuel byproduct whose supply may dwindle over time. Here, we perform a technoeconomic analysis of processes to coproduce Portland cement and sulfuric acid from gypsum via fossil-free variations of the once-prevalent Müller–Kühne (MK) process. With credit for coproduced sulfuric acid, a sulfur-driven variant of the MK process could achieve cost parity with limestone-derived cement ($40/t clinker) with dramatic (95–99%) reductions in the emission intensity. While MK process variants would saturate sulfuric acid markets well before they dominate world cement demand, these processes could simultaneously support a circular sulfur economy through valorization of gypsum waste and constitute a pathway to cost-effective decarbonized cement from a limestone-free feedstock.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石膏作为低成本脱碳硅酸盐水泥和硫酸的原料
在脱碳时代,水泥和硫酸的生产方法可能会发生变化。水泥的二氧化碳排放量占全球的8%,迫切需要脱碳,而硫酸(H2SO4)是由单质硫生产的,单质硫是化石燃料的副产品,其供应量可能会随着时间的推移而减少。在这里,我们通过对曾经流行的m ller - k (MK)工艺的无化石变化,对从石膏中共同生产波特兰水泥和硫酸的工艺进行了技术经济分析。由于联合生产硫酸,硫磺驱动的MK工艺变体可以实现与石灰石衍生水泥(40美元/吨熟料)相当的成本,并显著降低(95-99%)排放强度。虽然MK工艺变体在主导世界水泥需求之前就会使硫酸市场饱和,但这些工艺可以同时通过石膏废物的增值来支持循环硫经济,并构成一条从无石灰石原料生产具有成本效益的脱碳水泥的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
期刊最新文献
Sulfide Transport through Nanochannels in Carbonates Enables Simultaneous Cobalt Extraction and Carbon Mineralization Decoding Solvent Effects in Electrocatalytic Biomass Valorization: Levulinic Acid to γ-Valerolactone Glycine Electrosynthesis on ZnCu Dual-Atom Catalysts Partitioning Mechanism of Lignin in Biphasic Solvent Systems: Combined Experiments with Theoretical Calculations Enhanced Low-Temperature NH3–SCR Activity of MIL-100(Fe) Catalysts via Calcination Atmosphere Engineering: Structure Regulation and Reaction Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1