Maria Mazzitelli, Dagny Krankowska, Claudia Cozzolino, Vincenzo Scaglione, Francesco Barbaro, Gaia Borgato, Marco Falaguasta, Gary Whitlock, Annamaria Cattelan
{"title":"Sexual health knowledge, interest and acceptability of preexposure prophylaxis in migrant women.","authors":"Maria Mazzitelli, Dagny Krankowska, Claudia Cozzolino, Vincenzo Scaglione, Francesco Barbaro, Gaia Borgato, Marco Falaguasta, Gary Whitlock, Annamaria Cattelan","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Migrant women often experience difficulties in accessing sexual healthcare services. We assess the knowledge and acceptability of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in migrant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a survey exploring HIV and PrEP knowledge in a cohort of adult migrant women residing in Padua (Italy). Subsequently, women were counselled about PrEP, screened for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and asked about PrEP acceptability. We assessed factors correlating with PrEP acceptability using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty-one migrant women were included, mostly Nigerian (122, 55.2%), asylum seekers (78, 35.3%), with a low level of education (179, 81%), with a median age of 31 [interquartile range (IQR): 26-37] years and a median time in Italy of 59 months (IQR: 16-82). Of these, 86% disclosed a regular sexual activity, 17.4% reported to have experienced nonconsensual sexual intercourse, and 9.5% to have been paid for sex. Only 14.5% disclosed to regularly use condoms during sexual intercourse. Since their arrival in Italy, 35.7% had undergone a gynaecological examination, and 50.2% had received a STI screening. 85.5% women did not know how to access contraception, and 28.5% knew about PrEP. After counselling, 16.7% women said they would accept PrEP. PrEP acceptability was associated with living in an asylum seeker centre [adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR): 0.08, P = 0.03], international protection status (AdjOR: 4.98, P = 0.041), and natural contraception use (AdjOR: 5.27, P = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sexual health awareness/care and PrEP uptake in migrant women were low and highlighted the urgency of tackling the HIV/STI risk in this vulnerable population, by adopting specific outreach programmes and ensuring they receive information, support, and empowerment about options to make their sexual health safer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"1018-1023"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Migrant women often experience difficulties in accessing sexual healthcare services. We assess the knowledge and acceptability of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in migrant women.
Methods: We carried out a survey exploring HIV and PrEP knowledge in a cohort of adult migrant women residing in Padua (Italy). Subsequently, women were counselled about PrEP, screened for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and asked about PrEP acceptability. We assessed factors correlating with PrEP acceptability using logistic regression.
Results: Two hundred and twenty-one migrant women were included, mostly Nigerian (122, 55.2%), asylum seekers (78, 35.3%), with a low level of education (179, 81%), with a median age of 31 [interquartile range (IQR): 26-37] years and a median time in Italy of 59 months (IQR: 16-82). Of these, 86% disclosed a regular sexual activity, 17.4% reported to have experienced nonconsensual sexual intercourse, and 9.5% to have been paid for sex. Only 14.5% disclosed to regularly use condoms during sexual intercourse. Since their arrival in Italy, 35.7% had undergone a gynaecological examination, and 50.2% had received a STI screening. 85.5% women did not know how to access contraception, and 28.5% knew about PrEP. After counselling, 16.7% women said they would accept PrEP. PrEP acceptability was associated with living in an asylum seeker centre [adjusted odds ratio (AdjOR): 0.08, P = 0.03], international protection status (AdjOR: 4.98, P = 0.041), and natural contraception use (AdjOR: 5.27, P = 0.024).
Conclusion: Sexual health awareness/care and PrEP uptake in migrant women were low and highlighted the urgency of tackling the HIV/STI risk in this vulnerable population, by adopting specific outreach programmes and ensuring they receive information, support, and empowerment about options to make their sexual health safer.
目标:移徙妇女在获得性保健服务方面往往遇到困难。我们评估(暴露前预防)PrEP在MW的知识和可接受性。方法:我们对居住在意大利帕多瓦的成年MW队列进行了HIV和PrEP知识调查。随后,对妇女进行PrEP咨询,筛查性传播感染(sti),并询问PrEP的可接受性。我们使用逻辑回归评估与PrEP可接受性相关的因素。结果:共纳入221名移民,主要为尼日利亚人(122人,55.2%),寻求庇护者(78人,35.3%),受教育程度低(179人,81%),中位年龄为31岁(IQR:26-37),在意大利的中位时间为59个月(IQR:16-82)。其中,86%的人有规律的性行为,17.4%的人报告有过非自愿的性行为,9.5%的人有过有偿性行为。只有14.5%的人表示在性交过程中经常使用避孕套。自抵达意大利以来,35.7%的人接受了妇科检查,50.2%的人接受了性传播感染筛查。85.5%的妇女不知道如何获得避孕措施,28.5%的妇女知道PrEP,经咨询后,16.7%的妇女表示愿意接受PrEP。PrEP可接受性与难民中心居住(AdjOR: 0.08, p = 0.03)、国际保护状态(AdjOR:4.98, p = 0.041)和使用自然避孕(AdjOR:5.27, p = 0.024)有关。结论:巴布亚新几内亚性健康意识/保健和预防措施的接受程度较低,突出了解决这一弱势群体中艾滋病毒/性传播感染风险的紧迫性,办法是采取具体的外展方案,并确保他们获得有关使其性健康更安全的各种选择的信息、支持和赋权。
期刊介绍:
Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.