Payers' perspectives on wound care coverage policy determination: what we know and ways to move forward.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01
Marissa J Carter, Marcia Nusgart, Winifred Hayes
{"title":"Payers' perspectives on wound care coverage policy determination: what we know and ways to move forward.","authors":"Marissa J Carter, Marcia Nusgart, Winifred Hayes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many coverage challenges in wound care stem from a lack of shared clarity among researchers, manufacturers, payers, and regulators about the clinical evidence payers need to make positive coverage determinations. The Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders, a multidisciplinary trade association, convened its Wound Care Evidence Summit in May 2022 to explore this issue and identify shared challenges and solutions with a diverse range of policymakers, payers, and researchers. This article focuses on payers' clinical evidence requirements and the processes used when making coverage determinations, as discussed at the Summit. The authors explore the role of alternative sources of evidence beyond randomized clinical trials that were raised in the discussions: clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments, and clinical consensus. The article reviews discussions around the use of these in coverage decisions and explores potential solutions to achieve evidence-based practice and coverage policies that meet the needs of all patients with chronic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 2","pages":"86-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many coverage challenges in wound care stem from a lack of shared clarity among researchers, manufacturers, payers, and regulators about the clinical evidence payers need to make positive coverage determinations. The Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders, a multidisciplinary trade association, convened its Wound Care Evidence Summit in May 2022 to explore this issue and identify shared challenges and solutions with a diverse range of policymakers, payers, and researchers. This article focuses on payers' clinical evidence requirements and the processes used when making coverage determinations, as discussed at the Summit. The authors explore the role of alternative sources of evidence beyond randomized clinical trials that were raised in the discussions: clinical practice guidelines, health technology assessments, and clinical consensus. The article reviews discussions around the use of these in coverage decisions and explores potential solutions to achieve evidence-based practice and coverage policies that meet the needs of all patients with chronic wounds.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Payers' perspectives on wound care coverage policy determination: what we know and ways to move forward. Retrospective analysis of the effect of vaporous hyperoxia therapy as an adjunct to standard wound care in chronic wounds. The "C-swab" test: a technique for identifying bacteria in sinus tracts or tunneled wounds utilizing a cotton swab and bacterial fluorescence imaging. Assessing the knowledge of patients with diabetes about foot care and prevention of foot complications in Cameroon, West Africa. Atypical mycobacteria infections of surgical sites: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1