Health equity in the era of large language models.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2025.89695
Aaron A Tierney, Mary E Reed, Richard W Grant, Florence X Doo, Denise D Payán, Vincent X Liu
{"title":"Health equity in the era of large language models.","authors":"Aaron A Tierney, Mary E Reed, Richard W Grant, Florence X Doo, Denise D Payán, Vincent X Liu","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary presents a summary of 8 major regulations and guidelines that have direct implications for the equitable design, implementation, and maintenance of health care-focused large language models (LLMs) deployed in the US. We grouped key equity issues for LLMs into 3 domains: (1) linguistic and cultural bias, (2) accessibility and trust, and (3) oversight and quality control. Solutions shared by these regulations and guidelines are to (1) ensure diverse representation in training data and in teams that develop artificial intelligence (AI) tools, (2) develop techniques to evaluate AI-enabled health care tool performance against real-world data, (3) ensure that AI used in health care is free of discrimination and integrates equity principles, (4) take meaningful steps to ensure access for patients with limited English proficiency, (5) apply AI tools to make workplaces more efficient and reduce administrative burdens, (6) require human oversight of AI tools used in health care delivery, and (7) ensure AI tools are safe, accessible, and beneficial while respecting privacy. There is an opportunity to prevent further embedding of existing disparities and issues in the health care system by enhancing health equity through thoughtfully designed and deployed LLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 3","pages":"112-117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary presents a summary of 8 major regulations and guidelines that have direct implications for the equitable design, implementation, and maintenance of health care-focused large language models (LLMs) deployed in the US. We grouped key equity issues for LLMs into 3 domains: (1) linguistic and cultural bias, (2) accessibility and trust, and (3) oversight and quality control. Solutions shared by these regulations and guidelines are to (1) ensure diverse representation in training data and in teams that develop artificial intelligence (AI) tools, (2) develop techniques to evaluate AI-enabled health care tool performance against real-world data, (3) ensure that AI used in health care is free of discrimination and integrates equity principles, (4) take meaningful steps to ensure access for patients with limited English proficiency, (5) apply AI tools to make workplaces more efficient and reduce administrative burdens, (6) require human oversight of AI tools used in health care delivery, and (7) ensure AI tools are safe, accessible, and beneficial while respecting privacy. There is an opportunity to prevent further embedding of existing disparities and issues in the health care system by enhancing health equity through thoughtfully designed and deployed LLMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大语言模型时代的健康公平。
本评论总结了8项主要法规和指导方针,这些法规和指导方针对在美国部署的以医疗保健为重点的大型语言模型(llm)的公平设计、实施和维护有直接影响。我们将法学硕士的关键股权问题分为3个领域:(1)语言和文化偏见,(2)可及性和信任,以及(3)监督和质量控制。这些法规和指南共享的解决方案是:(1)确保培训数据和开发人工智能(AI)工具的团队中有不同的代表性,(2)开发技术,根据实际数据评估支持AI的医疗保健工具的性能,(3)确保医疗保健中使用的AI不受歧视并整合公平原则,(4)采取有意义的步骤,确保英语水平有限的患者也能使用AI。(5)应用人工智能工具提高工作场所效率,减轻行政负担;(6)要求人类监督医疗保健服务中使用的人工智能工具;(7)确保人工智能工具安全、可获取、有益,同时尊重隐私。通过精心设计和部署法学硕士,加强卫生公平,有机会防止现有的差距和问题进一步嵌入卫生保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
How value-based care with provider enablement improves maternal and infant outcomes in Medicaid. Expert consensus on essential characteristics of oncology value-based payment. Impact of Medicaid Institution for Mental Diseases exclusion on serious mental illness outcomes. Linking data to determine risk for 30-day readmissions in dementia. HEDIS glycemic goal achieved using control-IQ Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1