Raised intracranial pressure alters cortical vascular function and cephalic allodynia

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae415
Olivia Grech, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Emily C Stanyer, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Gareth G Lavery, Lisa J Hill, Philip R Holland, Alexandra J Sinclair
{"title":"Raised intracranial pressure alters cortical vascular function and cephalic allodynia","authors":"Olivia Grech, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Emily C Stanyer, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Gareth G Lavery, Lisa J Hill, Philip R Holland, Alexandra J Sinclair","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is associated with altered cerebral hemodynamics and cephalic pain. The relationship between the algetic response and cortical neurovascular changes in raised ICP is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this relationship and determine if lowering ICP (using a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist) could ameliorate the algetic response. We also sought to explore the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide in cephalic pain driven by raised ICP by inhibiting calcitonin gene-related peptide signalling and quantifying changes in the algetic response. In a rat model of raised ICP, created by intracisternal kaolin injection, mechanical thresholds were measured alongside steady-state potential and cerebral blood flow responses to spreading depolarisation. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy evaluated energetic substrates in animals with raised ICP ex-vivo. Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist olcegepant were injected daily and measurements were repeated. Kaolin increased ICP [median (range) 15.96mmHg (8.97) n = 8] versus controls [6.02mmHg (1.79) n = 6 p = 0.0007]. Animals with raised ICP exhibited reduced mechanical thresholds (mean (SD) hind paw baseline: 5.78g (2.81), day 7: 3.34g (2.22) p < 0.001, periorbital baseline: 6.13g (2.07), day 7: 2.35g (1.91) n = 12 p < 0.001). Depolarisation and repolarisation durations were increased [depolarisation raised ICP: 108.81s (222.12) n = 11, controls: 37.54s (108.38) n = 9 p = 0.038, repolarisation raised ICP: 1824.26s (3499.54) n = 12, controls: 86.96s (140.05) n = 9 p<0.0001]. CBF change was also reduced (85.55% (30.84) n = 9) compared to controls (217.64% (37.70) n = 8 p < 0.0001). Substrates for cellular energetics (ADP, ATP and NAD+) were depleted in rodent brains with raised ICP (p = 0.009, p = 0.018, p = 0.011 respectively). Exenatide significantly lowered ICP (exenatide: 9.74mmHg (6.09) n = 19, vehicle: 18.27mmHg (6.67) n = 16 p = 0.004) and rescued changes in mechanical withdrawal. Exenatide recovered characteristic spreading depolarisation responses (depolarisation duration exenatide: 56.46s (25.10) n = 7, vehicle: 115.98s (58.80) n = 6 p = 0.033) [repolarisation duration exenatide: 177.55s (562.88) n = 7, vehicle: 800.85s (1988.67) n = 6 p = 0.002]. In the setting of raised ICP olcegepant prevented changes in periorbital mechanical thresholds. We conclude that raised ICP disrupted the cortical neurovascular responses, reduced algetic thresholds and depleted crucial energetic substrates. Exenatide reduced ICP, improving algetic thresholds and cortical neurovascular changes. Importantly, olcegepant alleviated the cerebral algesia, suggesting calcitonin gene-related peptide’s role in driving pain responses in elevated ICP. These studies support the rationale that reducing ICP improves cephalic pain in conditions of raised ICP. Furthermore, the data suggests that headache pain, in diseases associated with raised ICP, could be therapeutically ameliorated though blockade of the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is associated with altered cerebral hemodynamics and cephalic pain. The relationship between the algetic response and cortical neurovascular changes in raised ICP is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this relationship and determine if lowering ICP (using a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist) could ameliorate the algetic response. We also sought to explore the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide in cephalic pain driven by raised ICP by inhibiting calcitonin gene-related peptide signalling and quantifying changes in the algetic response. In a rat model of raised ICP, created by intracisternal kaolin injection, mechanical thresholds were measured alongside steady-state potential and cerebral blood flow responses to spreading depolarisation. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy evaluated energetic substrates in animals with raised ICP ex-vivo. Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist olcegepant were injected daily and measurements were repeated. Kaolin increased ICP [median (range) 15.96mmHg (8.97) n = 8] versus controls [6.02mmHg (1.79) n = 6 p = 0.0007]. Animals with raised ICP exhibited reduced mechanical thresholds (mean (SD) hind paw baseline: 5.78g (2.81), day 7: 3.34g (2.22) p < 0.001, periorbital baseline: 6.13g (2.07), day 7: 2.35g (1.91) n = 12 p < 0.001). Depolarisation and repolarisation durations were increased [depolarisation raised ICP: 108.81s (222.12) n = 11, controls: 37.54s (108.38) n = 9 p = 0.038, repolarisation raised ICP: 1824.26s (3499.54) n = 12, controls: 86.96s (140.05) n = 9 p<0.0001]. CBF change was also reduced (85.55% (30.84) n = 9) compared to controls (217.64% (37.70) n = 8 p < 0.0001). Substrates for cellular energetics (ADP, ATP and NAD+) were depleted in rodent brains with raised ICP (p = 0.009, p = 0.018, p = 0.011 respectively). Exenatide significantly lowered ICP (exenatide: 9.74mmHg (6.09) n = 19, vehicle: 18.27mmHg (6.67) n = 16 p = 0.004) and rescued changes in mechanical withdrawal. Exenatide recovered characteristic spreading depolarisation responses (depolarisation duration exenatide: 56.46s (25.10) n = 7, vehicle: 115.98s (58.80) n = 6 p = 0.033) [repolarisation duration exenatide: 177.55s (562.88) n = 7, vehicle: 800.85s (1988.67) n = 6 p = 0.002]. In the setting of raised ICP olcegepant prevented changes in periorbital mechanical thresholds. We conclude that raised ICP disrupted the cortical neurovascular responses, reduced algetic thresholds and depleted crucial energetic substrates. Exenatide reduced ICP, improving algetic thresholds and cortical neurovascular changes. Importantly, olcegepant alleviated the cerebral algesia, suggesting calcitonin gene-related peptide’s role in driving pain responses in elevated ICP. These studies support the rationale that reducing ICP improves cephalic pain in conditions of raised ICP. Furthermore, the data suggests that headache pain, in diseases associated with raised ICP, could be therapeutically ameliorated though blockade of the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内压升高会改变大脑皮层的血管功能和头颅异感症
颅内压升高与脑血流动力学改变和头侧疼痛有关。ICP升高的代数反应与皮质神经血管变化之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估这种关系,并确定降低ICP(使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂)是否可以改善代数反应。我们还试图通过抑制降钙素基因相关肽信号传导和量化代数反应的变化来探索降钙素基因相关肽在ICP升高引起的头性疼痛中的作用。在脑内注射高岭土造成的颅内压升高大鼠模型中,测量了机械阈值以及稳态电位和脑血流对扩张性去极化的反应。核磁共振波谱法评估了ICP升高动物体内的高能底物。每日注射胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂艾塞那肽和降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂olcegeent,并重复测量。与对照组相比,高岭土使ICP升高[中位数(范围)15.96mmHg (8.97) n = 8] [6.02mmHg (1.79) n = 6 p = 0.0007]。ICP升高的动物表现出机械阈值降低(平均(SD)后爪基线:5.78g(2.81),第7天:3.34g (2.22) p <;0.001,眶周基线:6.13g(2.07),第7天:2.35g (1.91) n = 12 p <;0.001)。去极化和复极化持续时间增加[去极化使ICP升高:108.81s (222.12) n = 11,对照组:37.54s (108.38) n = 9 p = 0.038,复极化使ICP升高:1824.26s (3499.54) n = 12,对照组:86.96s (140.05) n = 9 p<0.0001]。与对照组(217.64% (37.70)n = 8)相比,CBF变化也降低了(85.55% (30.84)n = 9)。0.0001)。在ICP升高的鼠脑中,细胞能量的底物(ADP、ATP和NAD+)减少(p = 0.009、p = 0.018和p = 0.011)。艾塞那肽显著降低ICP(艾塞那肽:9.74mmHg (6.09) n = 19,载药:18.27mmHg (6.67) n = 16 p = 0.004)和机械停药的抢救变化。Exenatide恢复特征扩展去极化响应(去极化持续时间Exenatide: 56.46s (25.10) n = 7,载具:115.98s (58.80) n = 6 p = 0.033)[复极化持续时间Exenatide: 177.55s (562.88) n = 7,载具:800.85s (1988.67) n = 6 p = 0.002]。在ICP升高的情况下,孕激素阻止了眶周力学阈值的变化。我们得出结论,升高的ICP扰乱了皮层神经血管反应,降低了代数阈值,耗尽了关键的能量基质。艾塞那肽降低ICP,改善代数阈值和皮质神经血管改变。重要的是,孕激素减轻了大脑疼痛,提示降钙素基因相关肽在颅内压升高时驱动疼痛反应的作用。这些研究支持降低ICP可改善颅内压升高情况下的头侧疼痛的理论基础。此外,数据表明,在与ICP升高相关的疾病中,可以通过阻断降钙素基因相关肽途径从治疗上改善头痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Brainstem pathology in anti-IgLON5 disease: new insights into early events and tau progression Study of blood linear RNA nominates CD55 and DLD as early-stage biomarkers for Parkinson's sisease. The persisting puzzle of OFF time in advanced Parkinson's disease. Enhanced mGluR1 function causes motor deficits and region-specific Purkinje cell dysfunction. Risk, reward or repetition? New data on human ventral tegmental area stimulation challenge dominant frameworks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1