Academic-clinical collaborative partnerships: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of nurse academics, clinicians, and students

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106674
Hasan Fehmi Dirik , Menevse Yildirim , Sinem Ozmen , Seyda Seren Intepeler
{"title":"Academic-clinical collaborative partnerships: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of nurse academics, clinicians, and students","authors":"Hasan Fehmi Dirik ,&nbsp;Menevse Yildirim ,&nbsp;Sinem Ozmen ,&nbsp;Seyda Seren Intepeler","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collaborative partnerships are crucial for strengthening nursing education and practice, particularly in rapidly changing healthcare environments. Promoting collaborative academic-clinical partnerships that encourage unity of purpose among partners improves shared decision-making, enhances undergraduate education, and advances patient care. However, further research is required to discover more about the involvement of all partners in academic-service collaborations.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of the study was to identify the barriers to and facilitators of collaboration between nursing faculty and a university hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The study reported here was conducted using a descriptive design within a qualitative methodological framework.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Interviews were held with 36 participants between January and July 2023. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews (<em>n</em> = 36), which continued until data saturation was achieved. Inductive content analysis was used to interpret data from three groups: academics, clinicians, and students. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were followed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two main themes and seven sub-themes emerged from the interviews, indicating four facilitators of collaboration: “togetherness contributing to development,” “viewing each member as part of the team,” “motivating through constructive feedback,” and “willingness.” Three barriers were identified: “inadequate triad partner interaction,” “planning issues,” and “nursing shortage.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Promoting togetherness, considering all members as integral parts of the team, providing constructive feedback, and encouraging their contributions can facilitate and strengthen successful partnerships. Facilitators can help overcome barriers to planning, staff shortages, and limited interaction by being open to alternative approaches, learning from past experiences, and, use this information to (re)organize educational and clinical processes.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The results indicate how collaboration can be strengthened. This involves maintaining clear and effective communication, close and regular contact between partners, and frequent interaction. Therefore, to ensure the best healthcare processes and education are sustained, it is essential to foster collaboration between partners by implementing these facilitatory practices to overcome barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Patient or public contribution</h3><div>The nurses and students were active in identifying the topics covered during interviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 106674"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725001091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaborative partnerships are crucial for strengthening nursing education and practice, particularly in rapidly changing healthcare environments. Promoting collaborative academic-clinical partnerships that encourage unity of purpose among partners improves shared decision-making, enhances undergraduate education, and advances patient care. However, further research is required to discover more about the involvement of all partners in academic-service collaborations.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to identify the barriers to and facilitators of collaboration between nursing faculty and a university hospital.

Design

The study reported here was conducted using a descriptive design within a qualitative methodological framework.

Methods

Interviews were held with 36 participants between January and July 2023. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews (n = 36), which continued until data saturation was achieved. Inductive content analysis was used to interpret data from three groups: academics, clinicians, and students. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines were followed.

Results

Two main themes and seven sub-themes emerged from the interviews, indicating four facilitators of collaboration: “togetherness contributing to development,” “viewing each member as part of the team,” “motivating through constructive feedback,” and “willingness.” Three barriers were identified: “inadequate triad partner interaction,” “planning issues,” and “nursing shortage.”

Conclusions

Promoting togetherness, considering all members as integral parts of the team, providing constructive feedback, and encouraging their contributions can facilitate and strengthen successful partnerships. Facilitators can help overcome barriers to planning, staff shortages, and limited interaction by being open to alternative approaches, learning from past experiences, and, use this information to (re)organize educational and clinical processes.

Implications

The results indicate how collaboration can be strengthened. This involves maintaining clear and effective communication, close and regular contact between partners, and frequent interaction. Therefore, to ensure the best healthcare processes and education are sustained, it is essential to foster collaboration between partners by implementing these facilitatory practices to overcome barriers.

Patient or public contribution

The nurses and students were active in identifying the topics covered during interviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术-临床合作伙伴关系:从护士学者、临床医生和学生的角度对促进因素和障碍进行定性探索
合作伙伴关系对于加强护理教育和实践至关重要,特别是在快速变化的医疗环境中。促进协作的学术-临床伙伴关系,鼓励合作伙伴之间的目标统一,改善共同决策,加强本科教育,并推进患者护理。然而,需要进一步的研究来发现更多关于所有合作伙伴参与学术服务合作的情况。目的本研究旨在探讨大学医院护理师资合作的障碍及促进因素。设计本研究采用定性方法框架内的描述性设计。方法于2023年1 - 7月对36名参与者进行访谈。数据收集采用半结构化、深度的个人访谈(n = 36),该访谈一直持续到数据饱和。归纳内容分析用于解释来自三组的数据:学者、临床医生和学生。遵循了报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)指南。结果从访谈中出现了两个主要主题和七个次要主题,表明了四个促进合作的因素:“团结有助于发展”、“将每个成员视为团队的一部分”、“通过建设性反馈激励”和“意愿”。确定了三个障碍:“三合会伴侣互动不足”、“计划问题”和“护理短缺”。促进团结,将所有成员视为团队的组成部分,提供建设性的反馈,并鼓励他们的贡献,可以促进和加强成功的伙伴关系。辅导员可以通过对替代方法持开放态度,从过去的经验中学习,并利用这些信息(重新)组织教育和临床过程,帮助克服规划障碍、人员短缺和有限的互动。研究结果表明如何加强合作。这包括保持清晰和有效的沟通,合作伙伴之间密切和定期的联系,以及频繁的互动。因此,为了确保维持最佳的医疗保健流程和教育,必须通过实施这些促进性做法来促进合作伙伴之间的协作,以克服障碍。患者或公众贡献护士和学生在访谈中积极确定所涉及的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Clinical training challenges in critical care units for nursing students: A qualitative content analysis. Treatment fidelity in nursing education research: Striking a balance between rigor and real-world relevance as a contemporary challenge. Metaverse in healthcare education: A scoping review of definitions and challenges. Reorienting nursing education toward a culture of self-care: Nursing students' experiences of nurse self-care integration-A qualitative systematic review. AI literacy, information cocoons, and creativity in healthcare postgraduate education: A latent profile and mediation analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1