Moving away from volunteerism in community health? Motivations and wellbeing among urban and rural Ethiopian volunteers

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117928
Kenneth Maes , Svea Closser , Yihenew Tesfaye , Roza Abesha
{"title":"Moving away from volunteerism in community health? Motivations and wellbeing among urban and rural Ethiopian volunteers","authors":"Kenneth Maes ,&nbsp;Svea Closser ,&nbsp;Yihenew Tesfaye ,&nbsp;Roza Abesha","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Questions about the fairness, efficacy, and sustainability of volunteerism in community health have led some states and programs to attempt to scale back their reliance on “volunteer” labor. Such attempts demand theory-driven, comparative ethnographic research that makes sense of how such moves unfold and impact the lives of CHWs and the programs surrounding them. Guided by theory of the interaction of political and moral economies, this article comparatively analyzes two predominantly female community health workforces in Ethiopia, who worked as unpaid volunteers when their federal government was supposedly “moving away from volunteerism” in community health: (1) HIV/AIDS-focused, home-based caregivers in Addis Ababa (2007-9) organized by NGOs; and (2) primary health care-focused members of the Women's Development Army in rural Amhara (2012–16) organized by the state. Ethnographic and mixed methods, including surveys of volunteers' wellbeing (n = 110 in Addis Ababa; n = 73 in rural Amhara), were used to assemble each dataset. These data show 1) how exploitation of “volunteer” community health labor by states, NGOs, and partnerships between them is maintained through discourses of sacrifice and related notions; 2) what the deprivation, distress, and desires of community health workers reveal about the “voluntariness” of their labor; 3) how CHWs organize themselves into collectives seeking better working conditions; and 4) how these experiences and processes are gendered. In this post-COVID-19 era of persistent inequalities in health globally, comparative ethnographic research of efforts to move away from volunteerism can provide useful lessons for CHWs, policymakers, and advocates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"371 ","pages":"Article 117928"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions about the fairness, efficacy, and sustainability of volunteerism in community health have led some states and programs to attempt to scale back their reliance on “volunteer” labor. Such attempts demand theory-driven, comparative ethnographic research that makes sense of how such moves unfold and impact the lives of CHWs and the programs surrounding them. Guided by theory of the interaction of political and moral economies, this article comparatively analyzes two predominantly female community health workforces in Ethiopia, who worked as unpaid volunteers when their federal government was supposedly “moving away from volunteerism” in community health: (1) HIV/AIDS-focused, home-based caregivers in Addis Ababa (2007-9) organized by NGOs; and (2) primary health care-focused members of the Women's Development Army in rural Amhara (2012–16) organized by the state. Ethnographic and mixed methods, including surveys of volunteers' wellbeing (n = 110 in Addis Ababa; n = 73 in rural Amhara), were used to assemble each dataset. These data show 1) how exploitation of “volunteer” community health labor by states, NGOs, and partnerships between them is maintained through discourses of sacrifice and related notions; 2) what the deprivation, distress, and desires of community health workers reveal about the “voluntariness” of their labor; 3) how CHWs organize themselves into collectives seeking better working conditions; and 4) how these experiences and processes are gendered. In this post-COVID-19 era of persistent inequalities in health globally, comparative ethnographic research of efforts to move away from volunteerism can provide useful lessons for CHWs, policymakers, and advocates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远离社区卫生的志愿服务?埃塞俄比亚城乡志愿者的动机和幸福感
关于社区卫生中志愿服务的公平性、有效性和可持续性的问题,已经导致一些州和项目试图减少对“志愿”劳动力的依赖。这样的尝试需要理论驱动的、比较人种学的研究,以理解这些行动是如何展开的,如何影响chw的生活以及围绕他们的项目。本文以政治经济学和道德经济学的相互作用理论为指导,比较分析了埃塞俄比亚两支以女性为主的社区卫生工作者队伍,当他们的联邦政府被认为在社区卫生方面“远离志愿服务”时,她们作为无偿志愿者工作:(1)在亚的斯亚贝巴(2007- 2009)由非政府组织组织的以艾滋病毒/艾滋病为重点的家庭护理人员;(2)由国家组织的阿姆哈拉农村妇女发展军(2012 - 2016)初级卫生保健重点成员。人种学和混合方法,包括对亚的斯亚贝巴志愿者的幸福感进行调查(n = 110);n = 73,在阿姆哈拉农村),用于组装每个数据集。这些数据显示了1)国家、非政府组织以及它们之间的伙伴关系如何通过牺牲和相关概念的话语来维持对“志愿者”社区卫生劳动力的剥削;2)社区卫生工作者的剥夺、痛苦和愿望揭示了他们劳动的“自愿性”;3)卫生工作者如何组织集体,寻求更好的工作条件;4)这些经历和过程是如何被性别化的。在covid -19后全球卫生不平等现象持续存在的时代,对摆脱志愿服务的努力进行比较民族志研究可以为卫生工作者、政策制定者和倡导者提供有益的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Public servants or privileged elites? -Analyzing physician strikes in the Republic of Korea Anticipating unintended consequences of public health nutrition policy: Implications for disordered eating and weight stigma Police contact and self-rated health among LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ people Early-life adversity and problem drinking in adulthood: Improving on the measurement of adverse childhood experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1