Structural assessment and retrofitting of an old building in highly seismic zone of Pakistan

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109478
Obaidullah khan , Muhammad Faisal Javed , Sanaullah Khan
{"title":"Structural assessment and retrofitting of an old building in highly seismic zone of Pakistan","authors":"Obaidullah khan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Faisal Javed ,&nbsp;Sanaullah Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the seismic performance of a 40-year-old, four-story reinforced concrete building in Abbottabad, Pakistan, a highly seismic region. The structure, designed without adherence to current seismic provisions outlined in the Building Code of Pakistan 2021, was analyzed using a displacement-based approach (nonlinear static analysis) and incremental dynamic analysis (nonlinear dynamic analysis). The static analysis revealed that the building met performance objectives but exhibited low base shear and stiffness in its longer (x) direction, leading to significant member-level damage. Dynamic analysis further highlighted excessive drift and displacement in the x-direction, attributed to the building’s stiff-weak configuration, with excessive stiffness in the shorter (y) direction to support gravity loads and insufficient strength in the x-direction. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, shear walls were analytically introduced in the x-direction, effectively controlling displacement and reducing damage. The findings underscore the need for retrofitting older structures to enhance seismic resilience in high-risk regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 109478"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725002195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic performance of a 40-year-old, four-story reinforced concrete building in Abbottabad, Pakistan, a highly seismic region. The structure, designed without adherence to current seismic provisions outlined in the Building Code of Pakistan 2021, was analyzed using a displacement-based approach (nonlinear static analysis) and incremental dynamic analysis (nonlinear dynamic analysis). The static analysis revealed that the building met performance objectives but exhibited low base shear and stiffness in its longer (x) direction, leading to significant member-level damage. Dynamic analysis further highlighted excessive drift and displacement in the x-direction, attributed to the building’s stiff-weak configuration, with excessive stiffness in the shorter (y) direction to support gravity loads and insufficient strength in the x-direction. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, shear walls were analytically introduced in the x-direction, effectively controlling displacement and reducing damage. The findings underscore the need for retrofitting older structures to enhance seismic resilience in high-risk regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦高震区一座老建筑的结构评估与改造
本研究评估了巴基斯坦阿伯塔巴德一个具有40年历史的四层钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震性能,这是一个高震区。该结构的设计没有遵守2021年巴基斯坦建筑规范中概述的现行地震规定,使用基于位移的方法(非线性静态分析)和增量动态分析(非线性动态分析)进行了分析。静力分析表明,该建筑满足性能目标,但在较长(x)方向上表现出较低的基础剪切和刚度,导致显著的构件级损伤。动力分析进一步突出了x方向上过大的漂移和位移,这是由于建筑物的刚弱结构造成的,在较短的(y)方向上刚度过大,不足以支撑重力荷载,而在x方向上强度不足。为了减轻这些脆弱性,在x方向上分析引入了剪力墙,有效地控制了位移并减少了损伤。这些发现强调了在高风险地区改造旧结构以增强抗震能力的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Retraction notice to “Finite element evaluation of seismic response to RC interventions in historical masonry: Erzurum stone Granaries” [Eng. Fail. Anal. 178 (2025) 109727] Rotating bending fatigue analysis of 3D-printed PLA polymer composites: Effect of short fiber reinforcement and epoxy coating Wheel profile optimization for high-speed locomotives to suppress carbody hunting stability failure under complex wheel-rail conditions Guided wave characteristics and nondestructive testing of corrosion defects in threaded steel resin bolts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1