G.P. Krisciunas , E. Rodriguez-Diaz , L. Berry , G. Spokas , O.M. A'Amar , M. Couey , H. Edwards , J. Gooey , J. Hanks , Z. Lu , D. Lucas , M. O'Leary , R. Pistey , M. Sakharkar , K. Sayre , J. Tracy , G. Zhao , I.J. Bigio , G.A. Grillone
{"title":"Elastic scattering spectroscopy for intraoperative oral cancer mucosal margin guidance: Initial results from a 104 patient cohort","authors":"G.P. Krisciunas , E. Rodriguez-Diaz , L. Berry , G. Spokas , O.M. A'Amar , M. Couey , H. Edwards , J. Gooey , J. Hanks , Z. Lu , D. Lucas , M. O'Leary , R. Pistey , M. Sakharkar , K. Sayre , J. Tracy , G. Zhao , I.J. Bigio , G.A. Grillone","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy (ESS) classification accuracy of benign vs malignant tissue obtained during intra-operative oral cancer resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study comprised 104 patients with a biopsy positive for oral cancer (<em>N</em> = 85) or dysplasia (<em>N</em> = 19) who were scheduled to undergo surgical excision. ESS measurements were obtained intraoperatively on and immediately adjacent to the lesion within the planned resection margin prior to excision, and on contralateral normal-site control tissue. Two-millimeter biopsies were obtained from tumor and margin tissue. All measurements were evaluated using Leave One Person Out (LOPO) AI-assisted statistical algorithms. Three analyses evaluated ESS diagnostic accuracy: one at the sample level, one at the pooled sample patient level, and one using only diagnostically variable biopsy co-registered margin samples. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Diagnostic accuracy at the sample level yielded sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 84 %, and AUC = 0.91. Pooling samples within each patient yielded sensitivity = 94 %, specificity = 87 %, and AUC = 0.95. Sample level diagnostic accuracy at the margin yielded sensitivity = 76 %, specificity = 50 %, and AUC = 0.70, but prioritizing sensitivity, yielded a sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 30 %, with AUC = 0.70.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ESS device demonstrated high sensitivity and appropriate specificity when differentiating benign from malignant tissue. Discriminant ability increased when samples were pooled within patients, informing future protocols for evaluating intraoperative ESS measures. These data are very promising and support the contention that ESS could be a valuable adjunct tool that facilitates comprehensive and efficient assessment of surgical margins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 3","pages":"Article 104605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess Elastic Scattering Spectroscopy (ESS) classification accuracy of benign vs malignant tissue obtained during intra-operative oral cancer resection.
Methods
The study comprised 104 patients with a biopsy positive for oral cancer (N = 85) or dysplasia (N = 19) who were scheduled to undergo surgical excision. ESS measurements were obtained intraoperatively on and immediately adjacent to the lesion within the planned resection margin prior to excision, and on contralateral normal-site control tissue. Two-millimeter biopsies were obtained from tumor and margin tissue. All measurements were evaluated using Leave One Person Out (LOPO) AI-assisted statistical algorithms. Three analyses evaluated ESS diagnostic accuracy: one at the sample level, one at the pooled sample patient level, and one using only diagnostically variable biopsy co-registered margin samples. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC).
Results
Diagnostic accuracy at the sample level yielded sensitivity = 82 %, specificity = 84 %, and AUC = 0.91. Pooling samples within each patient yielded sensitivity = 94 %, specificity = 87 %, and AUC = 0.95. Sample level diagnostic accuracy at the margin yielded sensitivity = 76 %, specificity = 50 %, and AUC = 0.70, but prioritizing sensitivity, yielded a sensitivity = 90 %, specificity = 30 %, with AUC = 0.70.
Conclusion
The ESS device demonstrated high sensitivity and appropriate specificity when differentiating benign from malignant tissue. Discriminant ability increased when samples were pooled within patients, informing future protocols for evaluating intraoperative ESS measures. These data are very promising and support the contention that ESS could be a valuable adjunct tool that facilitates comprehensive and efficient assessment of surgical margins.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.