Use of automated room disinfection systems in the healthcare environment: A national survey.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001
Jongrim Choi, Ihn Sook Jeong, Jae Sim Jeong, Jae Geum Ryu, Eun-Suk Park, Si Hyeon Han
{"title":"Use of automated room disinfection systems in the healthcare environment: A national survey.","authors":"Jongrim Choi, Ihn Sook Jeong, Jae Sim Jeong, Jae Geum Ryu, Eun-Suk Park, Si Hyeon Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute healthcare settings across South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals. It evaluated the use of ARDSs, prior experiences, barriers to adoption, and reasons for satisfaction and dissatisfaction.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). The majority of systems were implemented following the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C systems were predominantly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP systems were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents expressing intent for continued use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty regarding UV-C efficacy, challenges in operating aHP systems, and high purchase costs for vHP systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Aim: This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute healthcare settings across South Korea.

Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals. It evaluated the use of ARDSs, prior experiences, barriers to adoption, and reasons for satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

Findings: Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). The majority of systems were implemented following the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C systems were predominantly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP systems were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents expressing intent for continued use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty regarding UV-C efficacy, challenges in operating aHP systems, and high purchase costs for vHP systems.

Conclusion: To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:自动室内消毒系统(ARDS)已在全球范围内被越来越多地采用,以应对新出现的传染病和抗生素耐药菌。目的:本研究旨在评估韩国急诊医疗机构目前使用 ARDS 的情况:方法: 对 150 家三级综合医院进行了全国范围的在线调查。调查评估了 ARDS 的使用情况、先前的经验、采用的障碍以及满意和不满意的原因:在接受调查的医院中,32.7% 的医院使用紫外线 C (UV-C),26.0% 的医院使用气溶过氧化氢 (aHP),15.3% 的医院使用气化过氧化氢 (vHP)。大多数系统都是在中东呼吸综合征爆发后使用的。紫外线-C 系统主要用于检查室和隔离室,而 aHP 和 vHP 系统则用于隔离室。UV-C 系统的满意率为 81.6%,aHP 系统为 76.9%,vHP 系统为 78.3%,91.3%-94.9% 的受访者表示有意继续使用。采用的障碍包括维护成本高、紫外线-C 疗效不确定、操作 aHP 系统有困难以及 vHP 系统购买成本高:要提高 ARDS 的采用率,解决高昂的维护成本和确认这些系统的消毒效果至关重要。提高便利性、成本效益和操作效率,以及制定用户指南和教育计划,对于有效利用 ARDSs 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
A Multifaceted Nursing Process to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in a Medical Intensive Care Unit in the Era of COVID-19. Implementation of a Secure Electronic Form for Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Reporting Associated with Increased Reports Among Healthcare Workers: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Quantifying the Progressing Landscape of Infection Preventionists: A Survey-Based Analysis of Workload and Resource Needs. Use of automated room disinfection systems in the healthcare environment: A national survey. Development of the Initial Leapfrog Group's Hand Hygiene Standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1