Jongrim Choi RN, PhD , Ihn Sook Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Sim Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Geum Ryu RN, PhD , Eun-Suk Park RN, PhD , Si Hyeon Han RN, MSN
{"title":"Use of automated room disinfection systems in the health care environment: A national survey","authors":"Jongrim Choi RN, PhD , Ihn Sook Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Sim Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Geum Ryu RN, PhD , Eun-Suk Park RN, PhD , Si Hyeon Han RN, MSN","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 714-718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655325001038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.
Methods
A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.
Results
Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.
Conclusions
To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)