Use of automated room disinfection systems in the health care environment: A national survey

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001
Jongrim Choi RN, PhD , Ihn Sook Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Sim Jeong RN, PhD , Jae Geum Ryu RN, PhD , Eun-Suk Park RN, PhD , Si Hyeon Han RN, MSN
{"title":"Use of automated room disinfection systems in the health care environment: A national survey","authors":"Jongrim Choi RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Ihn Sook Jeong RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Jae Sim Jeong RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Jae Geum Ryu RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Eun-Suk Park RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Si Hyeon Han RN, MSN","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 714-718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655325001038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.

Methods

A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.

Results

Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.

Conclusions

To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗环境中使用自动房间消毒系统:一项全国性调查。
背景:自动室内消毒系统(ARDS)已在全球范围内被越来越多地采用,以应对新出现的传染病和抗生素耐药菌。目的:本研究旨在评估韩国急诊医疗机构目前使用 ARDS 的情况:方法: 对 150 家三级综合医院进行了全国范围的在线调查。调查评估了 ARDS 的使用情况、先前的经验、采用的障碍以及满意和不满意的原因:在接受调查的医院中,32.7% 的医院使用紫外线 C (UV-C),26.0% 的医院使用气溶过氧化氢 (aHP),15.3% 的医院使用气化过氧化氢 (vHP)。大多数系统都是在中东呼吸综合征爆发后使用的。紫外线-C 系统主要用于检查室和隔离室,而 aHP 和 vHP 系统则用于隔离室。UV-C 系统的满意率为 81.6%,aHP 系统为 76.9%,vHP 系统为 78.3%,91.3%-94.9% 的受访者表示有意继续使用。采用的障碍包括维护成本高、紫外线-C 疗效不确定、操作 aHP 系统有困难以及 vHP 系统购买成本高:要提高 ARDS 的采用率,解决高昂的维护成本和确认这些系统的消毒效果至关重要。提高便利性、成本效益和操作效率,以及制定用户指南和教育计划,对于有效利用 ARDSs 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Targeting the Root: How Behavioral Feedback and Cultural Engagement Transformed Hand Hygiene at a Tertiary Acute Care Hospital. A Pilot Study to Explore the Impact of Just-in-Time Patient Hand Hygiene Education and Alcohol Based Hand Rub Use on Hand Contamination in Outpatient Settings. Tailoring Clinical Decision Support for Rural Hospitals: a qualitative pilot study of accessing infectious disease expertise for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Core Belief as the Key Driver: Overcoming Knowledge-Behavior Gap in Influenza Vaccination and Recommendation Among Healthcare Workers for Infection Control. High Prevalence of Legionella and Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas in Portable Hemodialysis RO Systems: Implications for Infection Control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1