Multicenter, multinational, prospective cohort study of the impact of chlorhexidine impregnated versus plain central lines on central line-associated bloodstream infections

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.002
Victor Daniel Rosenthal MD, PhD , Ruijie Yin PhD , Zhilin Jin PhD , Mat Nor Mohd Basri MD , Lai Yin Hoong MD , Fatimah Mohamad MD , Amani El-Kholy MD , Victor Bayani RN , Rana Hatem MD , Sheila Nainan Myatra MD , Linda Castro Páez RN , Mohit Kharbanda MD , Bikas Nag RN , Ertugrul Guclu MD , Esra Olmez Gazioglu MD , Sunita Gupta MD , Nellie Tumu RN
{"title":"Multicenter, multinational, prospective cohort study of the impact of chlorhexidine impregnated versus plain central lines on central line-associated bloodstream infections","authors":"Victor Daniel Rosenthal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ruijie Yin PhD ,&nbsp;Zhilin Jin PhD ,&nbsp;Mat Nor Mohd Basri MD ,&nbsp;Lai Yin Hoong MD ,&nbsp;Fatimah Mohamad MD ,&nbsp;Amani El-Kholy MD ,&nbsp;Victor Bayani RN ,&nbsp;Rana Hatem MD ,&nbsp;Sheila Nainan Myatra MD ,&nbsp;Linda Castro Páez RN ,&nbsp;Mohit Kharbanda MD ,&nbsp;Bikas Nag RN ,&nbsp;Ertugrul Guclu MD ,&nbsp;Esra Olmez Gazioglu MD ,&nbsp;Sunita Gupta MD ,&nbsp;Nellie Tumu RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We compared the efficacy of chlorhexidine-impregnated central lines (CLs) with plain CLs in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in critically ill patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted from April 2023 to August 2024 in 8 hospitals across India, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Colombia, Egypt, and Turkey. Data were collected prospectively using the INICC Surveillance Online System. Cases and controls were recruited simultaneously. Data were analyzed using t tests, χ² tests, and Fisher exact tests when indicated. Relative risks (RR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 6,672 patients were included. Patients with impregnated CLs had 4,721 CL-days, while those with plain CLs had 18,822 CL-days. The CLABSI rate in patients with impregnated CLs was 1.48 per 1,000 CL-days, compared to 4.78 per 1,000 CL-days in those with plain CLs (RR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31, 95%CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.14-0.67, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.003). A subgroup analysis excluding patients with hemodialysis but using central venous catheters (CVCs) showed 1.72 CLABSIs per 1,000 CL-days in patients with impregnated CVCs compared to 5.84 per 1,000 CL-days in those with plain CVCs (RR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.29, 95%CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.12-0.68, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the significant benefits of impregnated CLs over plain CLs in reducing CLABSI rates, achieving a 69% decrease in incidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"53 8","pages":"Pages 862-868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655325001051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We compared the efficacy of chlorhexidine-impregnated central lines (CLs) with plain CLs in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in critically ill patients.

Methods

The study was conducted from April 2023 to August 2024 in 8 hospitals across India, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Colombia, Egypt, and Turkey. Data were collected prospectively using the INICC Surveillance Online System. Cases and controls were recruited simultaneously. Data were analyzed using t tests, χ² tests, and Fisher exact tests when indicated. Relative risks (RR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

A total of 6,672 patients were included. Patients with impregnated CLs had 4,721 CL-days, while those with plain CLs had 18,822 CL-days. The CLABSI rate in patients with impregnated CLs was 1.48 per 1,000 CL-days, compared to 4.78 per 1,000 CL-days in those with plain CLs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.14-0.67, P = .003). A subgroup analysis excluding patients with hemodialysis but using central venous catheters (CVCs) showed 1.72 CLABSIs per 1,000 CL-days in patients with impregnated CVCs compared to 5.84 per 1,000 CL-days in those with plain CVCs (RR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.12-0.68, P = .004).

Conclusions

This study highlights the significant benefits of impregnated CLs over plain CLs in reducing CLABSI rates, achieving a 69% decrease in incidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心、多国、前瞻性队列研究:浸渍氯己定与普通中心静脉注射对中心静脉相关血流感染的影响。
目的:比较氯己定浸渍中心线(CLs)与普通中心线(CLABSIs)预防危重患者中心线相关性血流感染(CLABSIs)的疗效。方法:研究于2023年4月至2024年8月在印度、马来西亚、巴布亚新几内亚、哥伦比亚、埃及和土耳其的8家医院进行。使用INICC在线监测系统前瞻性地收集数据。同时招募病例和对照组。数据分析采用t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。计算相对危险度(RR)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共纳入6672例患者。浸渍CLs患者为4,721 CL-days,而普通CLs患者为18,822 CL-days。浸渍CLs患者的CLABSI率为1.48 / 1000 CL-days,而普通CLs患者的CLABSI率为4.78 / 1000 CL-days (RR=0.31, 95%CI=0.14-0.67, p=0.003)。排除血液透析但使用中心静脉导管(CVCs)的患者的亚组分析显示,浸渍CVCs患者每1000 CL-days clabsi为1.72个,而普通CVCs患者为5.84个(RR=0.29, 95%CI=0.12-0.68, p=0.004)。结论:本研究强调了浸渍CLs在降低CLABSI发生率方面的显著优势,其发生率降低了69%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Timeliness in Public Health Emergency Response: An Epidemiological Assessment of a Statewide SARS-CoV-2 Testing Initiative (April 2020-July 2021). Analysis of positivity rate among contact screening for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales by room and carbapenemase type. A Decade of Change: Comparative Findings from the 2015, 2020, and 2025 APIC MegaSurveys on the Infection Prevention Workforce. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Among Utah Medicaid Recipients: A 4-Year Population-Based Analysis. The Quality of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions on Surgical Infection Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1