Vaginal probiotics as therapeutic adjuncts for improving embryo transfer success rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07338-0
Arezoo Maleki-Hajiagha, Rana Karimi, Sheida Abbasi, Neda Emami, Fardin Amidi
{"title":"Vaginal probiotics as therapeutic adjuncts for improving embryo transfer success rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Arezoo Maleki-Hajiagha, Rana Karimi, Sheida Abbasi, Neda Emami, Fardin Amidi","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07338-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility treatments are continually evolving, with vaginal probiotic supplementation before embryo transfer (ET) being explored as a potential method to improve clinical outcomes. So, this systematic review evaluated the effect of vaginal probiotics on pregnancy rates following ET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries up to October 17, 2024. We included prospective interventional studies (RCTs or quasi-experimental) focusing on pregnancy outcomes post-ET. We excluded non-prospective studies, non-vaginal routes of probiotic administration, and studies with insufficient methodological or statistical details. The data was extracted from each qualifying study by two reviewers and recorded using an electronic form. Results were synthesized using a random-effects model, with Mantel-Haenszel (MH) risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated for ET outcomes. Also, subgroup analyses were done to explore the history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) as a probable source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six studies with 850 participants (419 in intervention and 431 in control groups). Vaginal probiotics showed a non-significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates compared to the control group (157 per 419 [37.47%] versus 136 per 431 [31.55%], respectively; RR: 1.19; P = 0.07), with similar findings in women with and without a history of RIF. No significant differences were found in biochemical pregnancy (RR: 1.04; P = 0.74) or ongoing pregnancy rates (RR: 1.09; P = 0.53). A non-significant reduction in miscarriage risk was observed (RR: 0.67; P = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaginal probiotics may offer a non-significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates and a slight non-significant reduction in miscarriage risk. However, considering the potential limitations of the included studies, findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research is needed to explore the potential of personalized probiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration code: </strong>CRD42024550798.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07338-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility treatments are continually evolving, with vaginal probiotic supplementation before embryo transfer (ET) being explored as a potential method to improve clinical outcomes. So, this systematic review evaluated the effect of vaginal probiotics on pregnancy rates following ET.

Methods: Studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries up to October 17, 2024. We included prospective interventional studies (RCTs or quasi-experimental) focusing on pregnancy outcomes post-ET. We excluded non-prospective studies, non-vaginal routes of probiotic administration, and studies with insufficient methodological or statistical details. The data was extracted from each qualifying study by two reviewers and recorded using an electronic form. Results were synthesized using a random-effects model, with Mantel-Haenszel (MH) risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated for ET outcomes. Also, subgroup analyses were done to explore the history of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) as a probable source of heterogeneity.

Results: We included six studies with 850 participants (419 in intervention and 431 in control groups). Vaginal probiotics showed a non-significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates compared to the control group (157 per 419 [37.47%] versus 136 per 431 [31.55%], respectively; RR: 1.19; P = 0.07), with similar findings in women with and without a history of RIF. No significant differences were found in biochemical pregnancy (RR: 1.04; P = 0.74) or ongoing pregnancy rates (RR: 1.09; P = 0.53). A non-significant reduction in miscarriage risk was observed (RR: 0.67; P = 0.12).

Conclusions: Vaginal probiotics may offer a non-significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates and a slight non-significant reduction in miscarriage risk. However, considering the potential limitations of the included studies, findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research is needed to explore the potential of personalized probiotic therapy.

Prospero registration code: CRD42024550798.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道益生菌作为提高胚胎移植成功率的治疗辅助:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:不孕症的治疗方法不断发展,在胚胎移植(ET)前阴道补充益生菌被探索为改善临床结果的潜在方法。因此,本系统综述评估了阴道益生菌对et后妊娠率的影响。方法:通过PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane和截至2024年10月17日的临床试验注册来确定研究。我们纳入了关注et后妊娠结局的前瞻性介入研究(rct或准实验)。我们排除了非前瞻性研究、非阴道给药途径以及方法学或统计细节不足的研究。数据由两名审稿人从每个合格的研究中提取,并使用电子表格记录。使用随机效应模型综合结果,计算ET结果的Mantel-Haenszel (MH)风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。此外,还进行了亚组分析,以探讨复发性植入失败(RIF)的历史作为异质性的可能来源。结果:我们纳入了6项研究,共850名参与者(干预组419人,对照组431人)。与对照组相比,阴道益生菌显示临床妊娠率无显著增加(157 / 419 [37.47%]vs 136 / 431 [31.55%]);RR: 1.19;P = 0.07),在有和没有RIF病史的女性中也有类似的发现。生化妊娠差异无统计学意义(RR: 1.04;P = 0.74)或持续妊娠率(RR: 1.09;p = 0.53)。流产风险无显著降低(RR: 0.67;p = 0.12)。结论:阴道益生菌可能提供临床妊娠率的无显著增加和流产风险的轻微无显著降低。然而,考虑到纳入研究的潜在局限性,研究结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步的研究来探索个性化益生菌治疗的潜力。普洛斯彼罗注册码:CRD42024550798。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Community Midwifery Care (CMC) on maternal and neonatal wellbeing in postnatal period: a qualitative study. Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism in early pregnancy (EAGM): protocol for a multicentre, open-labelled, two-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Association between maternal BMI and success of labor induction with oral misoprostol: a cohort study. Quality of intrapartum care assessed by women with fear of birth who received care in a midwifery continuity model in a rural area of Sweden- a longitudinal cohort study. Exploring sources of social support during pregnancy- a qualitative study in rural southern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1