A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjaf008
Theresa L White, Nira Cedres, Jonas K Olofsson
{"title":"A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.","authors":"Theresa L White, Nira Cedres, Jonas K Olofsson","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory (WM) processes are assumed to operate on a wide variety of sensory materials, yet WM research rarely extends beyond sight and hearing. In this systematic review, we integrate research from studies that address WM in olfaction, the sense of smell, spanning the last 50 yr (N = 44). We assessed whether 21 proposed \"benchmarks\" for WM generalize to olfactory WM. Seven benchmarks generalized to olfaction, whereas 2 failed to generalize. Evidence was insufficient to address the remaining 12 benchmarks (4 had mixed support and 8 were yet unaddressed). We conclude that the available evidence indicates that the sense of smell has a short-term memory system that mostly resembles WM processes in \"higher\" senses, although there are exceptions related to how olfactory WM performance is associated with other functions. We argue that researchers studying WM should explicitly consider evidence outside of the audio-visual senses when establishing theoretical frameworks. Further, we point out avenues for future research that may help close the remaining gaps in knowledge on this neglected topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working memory (WM) processes are assumed to operate on a wide variety of sensory materials, yet WM research rarely extends beyond sight and hearing. In this systematic review, we integrate research from studies that address WM in olfaction, the sense of smell, spanning the last 50 yr (N = 44). We assessed whether 21 proposed "benchmarks" for WM generalize to olfactory WM. Seven benchmarks generalized to olfaction, whereas 2 failed to generalize. Evidence was insufficient to address the remaining 12 benchmarks (4 had mixed support and 8 were yet unaddressed). We conclude that the available evidence indicates that the sense of smell has a short-term memory system that mostly resembles WM processes in "higher" senses, although there are exceptions related to how olfactory WM performance is associated with other functions. We argue that researchers studying WM should explicitly consider evidence outside of the audio-visual senses when establishing theoretical frameworks. Further, we point out avenues for future research that may help close the remaining gaps in knowledge on this neglected topic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知鼻子?评估嗅觉领域的工作记忆基准。
工作记忆(WM)过程被认为对各种各样的感觉材料起作用,但工作记忆的研究很少超出视觉和听觉。在这篇系统综述中,我们整合了过去50年来关于嗅觉中WM的研究(N=44)。我们评估了21个提议的WM“基准”是否可以推广到嗅觉WM。7个基准概括到嗅觉,而2个未能概括。证据不足以解决其余12个基准(4个有混合支持,8个尚未解决)。我们的结论是,现有的证据表明,嗅觉有一个短期记忆系统,主要类似于“高级”感官的WM过程,尽管嗅觉WM表现与其他功能相关的情况也有例外。我们认为,研究WM的研究人员在建立理论框架时应明确考虑视听感官之外的证据。此外,我们指出了未来研究的途径,可能有助于缩小这一被忽视主题的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
Complement activation correlates with impaired olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Clinical features of taste disorders in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: a report of 10 cases. Gustatory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Recent odor experience selectively modulates olfactory sensitivity across the glomerular output in the mouse olfactory bulb. Structural comparisons of human and mouse fungiform taste buds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1