'Incidence and impact of structural valve deterioration following TAVI: a multicenter real-world study'.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf083
Iria Silva, Alberto Alperi, Antonio Muñoz, Asim Cheema, Luis Nombela, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Edgar Tay, Marina Urena, Lluis Asmarats, María Del Trigo, Yinghao Lim, Lola Gutierrez Alonso, Ander Regueiro, Francisco Campelo-Parada, Vicenç Serra, David Del Val, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Julien Ternacle, Victoria Vilalta, Pablo Vidal, Yassin Belahnech, Fernando Alfonso, Jorge Nuche, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Philippe Pibarot
{"title":"'Incidence and impact of structural valve deterioration following TAVI: a multicenter real-world study'.","authors":"Iria Silva, Alberto Alperi, Antonio Muñoz, Asim Cheema, Luis Nombela, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Edgar Tay, Marina Urena, Lluis Asmarats, María Del Trigo, Yinghao Lim, Lola Gutierrez Alonso, Ander Regueiro, Francisco Campelo-Parada, Vicenç Serra, David Del Val, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Julien Ternacle, Victoria Vilalta, Pablo Vidal, Yassin Belahnech, Fernando Alfonso, Jorge Nuche, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Philippe Pibarot","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Valve durability becomes a major issue as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expanding to populations with longer life expectancy. We sought to (i) determine the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), (ii) compare the incidence of SVD between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves, and (iii) analyse the impact of SVD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>2040 patients who underwent TAVI (2007-2020) from 9 centres were included. After inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), 1848 patients were selected (973 BE and 875 SE). SVD was defined using recent echocardiographic definitions according to VARC-3 criteria: Median follow-up was 4.2 (IQR: 2.5-5.7) years. The estimated incidence of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at 8 years follow-up for the overall cohort were 13.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-18%] and 11.5% (95% CI 8.9-14.8%), respectively. After IPTW and a median follow-up of 4 years, the risk of SVD (5.25% vs. 1.19%; HR 10.25, 95% CI 3.79-27.71, P < 0.001), and all-cause BVF (6.41% vs. 3.2%; HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.27-3.47 P = 0.004), was significantly higher for BE compared with SE recipients. Patients developing SVD had a trend towards a higher incidence of cardiovascular death (P = 0.06), as well as a significantly higher risk of heart failure rehospitalization (P = 0.048). After IPTW, there were no differences between BE and SE recipients in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization and valve reintervention (P = 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world registry, the incidence of SVD at 8 years after TAVI was relatively low. The risk of SVD was higher among BE compared with SE valve recipients. SVD was associated with an increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and a trend towards a higher risk of cardiovascular death.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1018-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Valve durability becomes a major issue as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expanding to populations with longer life expectancy. We sought to (i) determine the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), (ii) compare the incidence of SVD between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves, and (iii) analyse the impact of SVD.

Methods and results: 2040 patients who underwent TAVI (2007-2020) from 9 centres were included. After inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), 1848 patients were selected (973 BE and 875 SE). SVD was defined using recent echocardiographic definitions according to VARC-3 criteria: Median follow-up was 4.2 (IQR: 2.5-5.7) years. The estimated incidence of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at 8 years follow-up for the overall cohort were 13.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-18%] and 11.5% (95% CI 8.9-14.8%), respectively. After IPTW and a median follow-up of 4 years, the risk of SVD (5.25% vs. 1.19%; HR 10.25, 95% CI 3.79-27.71, P < 0.001), and all-cause BVF (6.41% vs. 3.2%; HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.27-3.47 P = 0.004), was significantly higher for BE compared with SE recipients. Patients developing SVD had a trend towards a higher incidence of cardiovascular death (P = 0.06), as well as a significantly higher risk of heart failure rehospitalization (P = 0.048). After IPTW, there were no differences between BE and SE recipients in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization and valve reintervention (P = 0.46).

Conclusion: In this real-world registry, the incidence of SVD at 8 years after TAVI was relatively low. The risk of SVD was higher among BE compared with SE valve recipients. SVD was associated with an increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and a trend towards a higher risk of cardiovascular death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TAVI后结构阀门恶化的发生率和影响:一项多中心真实世界研究。
目的:随着经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)扩展到预期寿命较长的人群,瓣膜耐久性成为一个主要问题。我们试图i)确定结构性瓣膜恶化(SVD)的发生率,ii)比较球囊膨胀(BE)和自膨胀(SE)瓣膜SVD的发生率,以及iii)分析SVD的影响。方法和结果:纳入来自9个中心的2040例TAVI患者(2007-2020)。经逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)后,选取1848例患者(973例BE, 875例SE)。SVD根据最近的超声心动图定义,根据VARC-3标准定义:中位随访时间为4.2年(IQR: 2.5-5.7年)。在整个队列的8年随访中,SVD和生物假体瓣膜衰竭(BVF)的估计发生率分别为13.3% (95%CI 9.8-18%)和11.5% (95%CI 8.9-14.8%)。IPTW和中位随访4年后,SVD的风险(5.25% vs. 1.19%;HR 10.25, 95%CI 3.79-27.71, p结论:在这个真实世界的登记中,TAVI后8年SVD的发生率相对较低。BE瓣膜接受者发生SVD的风险高于SE瓣膜接受者。SVD与心力衰竭再住院的风险增加以及心血管死亡风险增加的趋势相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
'Cardiomyopathy mindset' applied to Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion: Cardiac Amyloidosis behind myocardial perfusion defects. Regarding: Vendor differences in 2D-speckle tracking global longitudinal strain measurements and potential improvements compared with 10 years ago. Intense Myocardial Uptake in a Patient with Fabry Disease - a new cause of false positive of Bone Scintigraphy mimicking cardiac amyloidosis. Predictive value of early diastolic mitral annular velocity and body mass index as markers of left ventricular relaxation: Validation against invasive time constant of relaxation. Disappeared Aortic Valve Mechanical Prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1