Iria Silva, Alberto Alperi, Antonio Muñoz, Asim Cheema, Luis Nombela, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Edgar Tay, Marina Urena, Lluis Asmarats, María Del Trigo, Yinghao Lim, Lola Gutierrez Alonso, Ander Regueiro, Francisco Campelo-Parada, Vicenç Serra, David Del Val, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Julien Ternacle, Victoria Vilalta, Pablo Vidal, Yassin Belahnech, Fernando Alfonso, Jorge Nuche, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Philippe Pibarot
{"title":"Incidence and Impact of Structural Valve Deterioration Following TAVI: a Multicenter Real-World Study.","authors":"Iria Silva, Alberto Alperi, Antonio Muñoz, Asim Cheema, Luis Nombela, Gabriela Veiga-Fernandez, Edgar Tay, Marina Urena, Lluis Asmarats, María Del Trigo, Yinghao Lim, Lola Gutierrez Alonso, Ander Regueiro, Francisco Campelo-Parada, Vicenç Serra, David Del Val, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Julien Ternacle, Victoria Vilalta, Pablo Vidal, Yassin Belahnech, Fernando Alfonso, Jorge Nuche, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Philippe Pibarot","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Valve durability becomes a major issue as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expanding to populations with longer life expectancy. We sought to i) determine the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), ii) compare the incidence of SVD between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves, and iii) analyze the impact of SVD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>2040 patients who underwent TAVI (2007-2020) from 9 centers were included. After inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), 1848 patients were selected (973 BE and 875 SE). SVD was defined using recent echocardiographic definitions according to VARC-3 criteria: Median follow-up was 4.2 (IQR: 2.5-5.7) years. The estimated incidence of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at 8-years follow-up for the overall cohort were 13.3% (95%CI 9.8-18%) and 11.5% (95%CI 8.9-14.8%), respectively. After IPTW and a median follow-up of 4 years, the risk of SVD (5.25 % vs. 1.19%; HR 10.25, 95%CI 3.79-27.71, p <0.001), and all-cause BVF (6.41% vs. 3.2%; HR 2.1, 95%CI 1.27-3.47 p=0.004), was significantly higher for BE compared to SE recipients. Patients developing SVD had a trend towards a higher incidence of cardiovascular death (p=0.06), as well as a significantly higher risk of heart failure rehospitalization (p=0.048). After IPTW, there were no differences between BE and SE recipients in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization and valve reintervention (p=0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world registry, the incidence of SVD at 8-years after TAVI was relatively low. The risk of SVD was higher among BE compared to SE valve recipients. SVD was associated with increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and a trend towards a higher risk of cardiovascular death.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Valve durability becomes a major issue as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is expanding to populations with longer life expectancy. We sought to i) determine the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD), ii) compare the incidence of SVD between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) valves, and iii) analyze the impact of SVD.
Methods and results: 2040 patients who underwent TAVI (2007-2020) from 9 centers were included. After inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), 1848 patients were selected (973 BE and 875 SE). SVD was defined using recent echocardiographic definitions according to VARC-3 criteria: Median follow-up was 4.2 (IQR: 2.5-5.7) years. The estimated incidence of SVD and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at 8-years follow-up for the overall cohort were 13.3% (95%CI 9.8-18%) and 11.5% (95%CI 8.9-14.8%), respectively. After IPTW and a median follow-up of 4 years, the risk of SVD (5.25 % vs. 1.19%; HR 10.25, 95%CI 3.79-27.71, p <0.001), and all-cause BVF (6.41% vs. 3.2%; HR 2.1, 95%CI 1.27-3.47 p=0.004), was significantly higher for BE compared to SE recipients. Patients developing SVD had a trend towards a higher incidence of cardiovascular death (p=0.06), as well as a significantly higher risk of heart failure rehospitalization (p=0.048). After IPTW, there were no differences between BE and SE recipients in the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization and valve reintervention (p=0.46).
Conclusions: In this real-world registry, the incidence of SVD at 8-years after TAVI was relatively low. The risk of SVD was higher among BE compared to SE valve recipients. SVD was associated with increased risk of heart failure rehospitalization and a trend towards a higher risk of cardiovascular death.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.
The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.