Systematic review of well-being interventions for minority healthcare workers.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1531090
Tanvi Bafna, Mansoor Malik, Mohua C Choudhury, William Hu, Christine M Weston, Kristina R Weeks, Cheryl Connors, M Haroon Burhanullah, George Everly, Henry J Michtalik, Albert W Wu
{"title":"Systematic review of well-being interventions for minority healthcare workers.","authors":"Tanvi Bafna, Mansoor Malik, Mohua C Choudhury, William Hu, Christine M Weston, Kristina R Weeks, Cheryl Connors, M Haroon Burhanullah, George Everly, Henry J Michtalik, Albert W Wu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1531090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare workers' well-being is of utmost importance given persistent high rates of burnout, which also affects quality of care. Minority healthcare workers (MHCW) face unique challenges including structural racism and discrimination. There is limited data on interventions addressing the psychological well-being of MHCW. Thus, this systematic review aims to identify interventions specifically designed to support MHCW well-being, and to compare measures of well-being between minority and non-minority healthcare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple electronic databases. Two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and extraction. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) or Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria were utilized to assess the methodological quality of studies, based on the study design. Total scores as percentages of criteria met were used to determine overall quality as low (<40%), moderate (40-80%), or high (>80%). For conflicts, consensus was reached through discussion. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of study designs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,816 records were screened and 43 were included in the review. The majority of included studies (76.7%) were of moderate quality. There were no randomized control trials and only one study included a well-being intervention designed specifically for MHCW. Most (67.4%) were quantitative-descriptive studies that compared well-being measures between minority and non-minority identifying healthcare workers. Common themes identified were burnout, job retention, job satisfaction, discrimination, and diversity. There were conflicting results regarding burnout rates in MHCW vs non-minority workers with some studies citing protective resilience and lower burnout while others reported greater burnout due to compounding systemic factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings illuminate a lack of MHCW-specific well-being programs. The conflicting findings of MHCW well-being do not eliminate the need for supports among this population. Given the distinct experiences of MHCW, the development of policies surrounding diversity and inclusion, mental health services, and cultural competency should be considered. Understanding the barriers faced by MHCW can improve both well-being among the healthcare workforce and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1531090"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1531090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare workers' well-being is of utmost importance given persistent high rates of burnout, which also affects quality of care. Minority healthcare workers (MHCW) face unique challenges including structural racism and discrimination. There is limited data on interventions addressing the psychological well-being of MHCW. Thus, this systematic review aims to identify interventions specifically designed to support MHCW well-being, and to compare measures of well-being between minority and non-minority healthcare workers.

Methods: We searched multiple electronic databases. Two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and extraction. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) or Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria were utilized to assess the methodological quality of studies, based on the study design. Total scores as percentages of criteria met were used to determine overall quality as low (<40%), moderate (40-80%), or high (>80%). For conflicts, consensus was reached through discussion. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of study designs.

Results: A total of 3,816 records were screened and 43 were included in the review. The majority of included studies (76.7%) were of moderate quality. There were no randomized control trials and only one study included a well-being intervention designed specifically for MHCW. Most (67.4%) were quantitative-descriptive studies that compared well-being measures between minority and non-minority identifying healthcare workers. Common themes identified were burnout, job retention, job satisfaction, discrimination, and diversity. There were conflicting results regarding burnout rates in MHCW vs non-minority workers with some studies citing protective resilience and lower burnout while others reported greater burnout due to compounding systemic factors.

Discussion: Our findings illuminate a lack of MHCW-specific well-being programs. The conflicting findings of MHCW well-being do not eliminate the need for supports among this population. Given the distinct experiences of MHCW, the development of policies surrounding diversity and inclusion, mental health services, and cultural competency should be considered. Understanding the barriers faced by MHCW can improve both well-being among the healthcare workforce and patient care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对少数民族卫生保健工作者福祉干预措施的系统评价。
导读:鉴于持续的高倦怠率,医护人员的福祉是至关重要的,这也影响了护理质量。少数民族卫生保健工作者面临着独特的挑战,包括结构性种族主义和歧视。针对MHCW心理健康的干预措施数据有限。因此,本系统综述旨在确定特别设计的干预措施,以支持MHCW的福祉,并比较少数民族和非少数民族卫生保健工作者之间的福祉措施。方法:检索多个电子数据库。两名独立审稿人进行文献筛选和提取。基于研究设计,采用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)或乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)标准评估研究的方法学质量。总得分作为满足标准的百分比用于确定整体质量低(80%)。对于矛盾,通过讨论达成共识。由于研究设计的异质性,无法进行meta分析。结果:共筛选3816条记录,纳入43条。大多数纳入的研究(76.7%)质量中等。没有随机对照试验,只有一项研究包括专门为MHCW设计的健康干预。大多数(67.4%)是定量描述性研究,比较了少数民族和非少数民族卫生保健工作者之间的福利措施。常见的主题包括职业倦怠、工作留任、工作满意度、歧视和多样性。关于MHCW和非少数族裔员工的职业倦怠率,有一些研究引用了保护性弹性和较低的职业倦怠,而另一些研究则报告了由于综合系统因素而导致的更高的职业倦怠。讨论:我们的研究结果说明缺乏mhcw特定的福利计划。MHCW幸福感的相互矛盾的发现并不能消除这一人群对支持的需求。鉴于MHCW的独特经验,应考虑制定有关多样性和包容性、精神卫生服务和文化能力的政策。了解MHCW面临的障碍可以改善医护人员的福祉和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Research advances on gut microbiota dysbiosis and chronic liver diseases: a review. Summary of the best evidence for early rehabilitation in ICU patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Development and application of a clinical psychological nursing training program for nursing interns based on the ADDIE model. Trends and projections of dermatitis burden (1990-2040): a 2021 global burden of disease analysis. Total flavonoids from Abelmoschus manihot (L.) improve diabetes nephropathy by regulating the gut-kidney axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1