Controversies in the management of mucinous ovarian tumors.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101679
Félix Blanc-Durand, Alexandra Leary
{"title":"Controversies in the management of mucinous ovarian tumors.","authors":"Félix Blanc-Durand, Alexandra Leary","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, comprising less than 5% of all cases, and distinguished by its unique molecular, histologic, and clinical features. Its rarity and marked differences from other ovarian cancer subtypes have led to significant controversies regarding its diagnosis, surgical strategies, and systemic therapies. Accurate differentiation between primary and metastatic MOCs remains a critical challenge because of their overlapping features with gastrointestinal cancers, often leading to misclassification. This can result in suboptimal management and impaired patient outcomes, thus highlighting the importance of high-quality pathologic reviews. The surgical approach to MOC is highly controversial. In early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery should be systematically considered in young patients, although its feasibility requires careful consideration. In addition, systematic staging lymphadenectomy, which has been de-escalated for patients with expansile MOC, is recommended for those with early-stage infiltrative MOC. In advanced-stage disease, where tumors are often bulky and chemoresistant, the benefits of extensive cytoreduction must be balanced against surgical morbidities. MOC poses significant challenges for systemic treatment owing to its poor response rate to standard ovarian cancer chemotherapy regimens. Alternative therapeutic strategies offer promise but lack robust clinical validation, including gastrointestinal-based regimens, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (eg, trastuzumab deruxtecan), and immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite unstable MOC. Furthermore, pre-clinical and early phase trials have suggested the potential of combination strategies, including RAS pathway and WEE1 inhibitors. Addressing these controversies requires a multidisciplinary approach that underscores the importance of histologic subtyping and molecular profiling to guide personalized treatment. International collaboration is essential for overcoming the rarity of MOC by enabling larger studies and global registries. These efforts are pivotal for improving diagnostic accuracy, expanding therapeutic options, and, ultimately, enhancing outcomes in patients with this challenging malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 3","pages":"101679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, comprising less than 5% of all cases, and distinguished by its unique molecular, histologic, and clinical features. Its rarity and marked differences from other ovarian cancer subtypes have led to significant controversies regarding its diagnosis, surgical strategies, and systemic therapies. Accurate differentiation between primary and metastatic MOCs remains a critical challenge because of their overlapping features with gastrointestinal cancers, often leading to misclassification. This can result in suboptimal management and impaired patient outcomes, thus highlighting the importance of high-quality pathologic reviews. The surgical approach to MOC is highly controversial. In early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery should be systematically considered in young patients, although its feasibility requires careful consideration. In addition, systematic staging lymphadenectomy, which has been de-escalated for patients with expansile MOC, is recommended for those with early-stage infiltrative MOC. In advanced-stage disease, where tumors are often bulky and chemoresistant, the benefits of extensive cytoreduction must be balanced against surgical morbidities. MOC poses significant challenges for systemic treatment owing to its poor response rate to standard ovarian cancer chemotherapy regimens. Alternative therapeutic strategies offer promise but lack robust clinical validation, including gastrointestinal-based regimens, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (eg, trastuzumab deruxtecan), and immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite unstable MOC. Furthermore, pre-clinical and early phase trials have suggested the potential of combination strategies, including RAS pathway and WEE1 inhibitors. Addressing these controversies requires a multidisciplinary approach that underscores the importance of histologic subtyping and molecular profiling to guide personalized treatment. International collaboration is essential for overcoming the rarity of MOC by enabling larger studies and global registries. These efforts are pivotal for improving diagnostic accuracy, expanding therapeutic options, and, ultimately, enhancing outcomes in patients with this challenging malignancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢黏液性肿瘤治疗的争议。
粘液性卵巢癌(MOC)是一种罕见的上皮性卵巢癌亚型,占所有病例的不到5%,以其独特的分子、组织学和临床特征而著称。它的罕见性和与其他卵巢癌亚型的显著差异导致了对其诊断、手术策略和全身治疗的重大争议。原发和转移性MOCs的准确鉴别仍然是一个关键的挑战,因为它们与胃肠道癌症有重叠的特征,经常导致错误分类。这可能导致次优管理和患者预后受损,因此强调了高质量病理检查的重要性。MOC的手术入路争议很大。在早期疾病中,年轻患者应系统地考虑保留生育能力的手术,尽管其可行性需要仔细考虑。此外,对于早期浸润性MOC患者,建议采用系统分期淋巴结切除术,该方法在扩张性MOC患者中已不再适用。在晚期疾病中,肿瘤通常体积大且耐药,广泛的细胞减少的好处必须与手术并发症相平衡。由于MOC对标准卵巢癌化疗方案的反应率较低,因此对全身治疗提出了重大挑战。替代治疗策略提供了希望,但缺乏强有力的临床验证,包括基于胃肠道的方案,her2靶向抗体-药物偶联物(例如,曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康)和微卫星不稳定MOC的免疫检查点抑制剂。此外,临床前和早期试验表明,包括RAS通路和WEE1抑制剂在内的联合策略具有潜力。解决这些争议需要多学科的方法,强调组织分型和分子谱的重要性,以指导个性化治疗。通过开展更大规模的研究和全球登记,国际合作对于克服MOC的稀缺性至关重要。这些努力对于提高诊断准确性,扩大治疗选择,并最终提高这种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤患者的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma: is the evidence ripe for this strength of recommendation?' [International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Volume 35 Issue 11 (2025) 102132]. Correspondence on "Elenagen, a p62/SQSTM1-encoding plasmid, improves overall survival in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a phase II trial" by Krasny et al. Let's use an equity framework to improve research, its design, implementation, and community. Proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer studies: a systematic review and call for action in future studies. Comparison of survival outcomes and safety between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance in newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1