Ergonomic risk assessment in construction: Case study Ecuador.

IF 3.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Heliyon Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42751
Oswaldo Tandazo, Victoria Jaramillo-Carrión, Eduardo Valarezo, Mercedes Sanchís-Almenara, Laura Montalbán-Domingo, Joaquín Catalá-Alís
{"title":"Ergonomic risk assessment in construction: Case study Ecuador.","authors":"Oswaldo Tandazo, Victoria Jaramillo-Carrión, Eduardo Valarezo, Mercedes Sanchís-Almenara, Laura Montalbán-Domingo, Joaquín Catalá-Alís","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ergonomic risks are a global problem in construction, with health effects that have an impact on the economy. Risk assessment allows companies to identify the risks and the exposure levels to which the workers are subjected and allows to define management plans to address them. However, studies to assess risk levels through new techniques are very scarce in construction. This study aims to evaluate ergonomic risks in construction workers using Ergo/IBV (software for the assessment of ergonomic risks and design recommendations) by the observational REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method. Data were collected from 14 public sector building projects from May to November 2023. Thirty-two construction finishing activities were identified. Through the stratified method, the five most frequently executed activities were selected: interior and exterior painting, floor ceramics, wall plastering, ceiling and wall plastering. This made it possible to evaluate the ergonomic risk in 94 workers. The evaluation shows that 40 % of the workers were exposed to a high-risk level in the trunk, 2 % in the legs, 20 % in the right arm, and 22 % in the left arm. In short, the five activities adopt forced postures, with REBA scores: medium, high and very high, with high risk level being the most relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"11 4","pages":"e42751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ergonomic risks are a global problem in construction, with health effects that have an impact on the economy. Risk assessment allows companies to identify the risks and the exposure levels to which the workers are subjected and allows to define management plans to address them. However, studies to assess risk levels through new techniques are very scarce in construction. This study aims to evaluate ergonomic risks in construction workers using Ergo/IBV (software for the assessment of ergonomic risks and design recommendations) by the observational REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method. Data were collected from 14 public sector building projects from May to November 2023. Thirty-two construction finishing activities were identified. Through the stratified method, the five most frequently executed activities were selected: interior and exterior painting, floor ceramics, wall plastering, ceiling and wall plastering. This made it possible to evaluate the ergonomic risk in 94 workers. The evaluation shows that 40 % of the workers were exposed to a high-risk level in the trunk, 2 % in the legs, 20 % in the right arm, and 22 % in the left arm. In short, the five activities adopt forced postures, with REBA scores: medium, high and very high, with high risk level being the most relevant.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑中的人体工程学风险评估:厄瓜多尔案例研究。
人体工程学风险是建筑业的一个全球性问题,对健康的影响对经济产生影响。风险评估使公司能够识别工人所面临的风险和暴露水平,并允许制定管理计划来解决这些问题。然而,通过新技术评估风险水平的研究在建筑领域非常缺乏。本研究旨在运用Ergo/IBV(人体工程学风险与设计建议评估软件),采用观察性REBA(快速全身评估)方法对建筑工人的人体工程学风险进行评估。数据收集自2023年5月至11月期间的14个公共部门建筑项目。确定了32个建筑精加工活动。通过分层方法,选择了五个最常执行的活动:室内外粉刷,地板陶瓷,墙壁抹灰,天花板和墙壁抹灰。这使得评估94名工人的人体工程学风险成为可能。评估显示,40%的工人暴露在高危险水平的躯干,2%在腿部,20%在右臂,22%在左臂。简而言之,五种活动均采用强迫体位,REBA得分为中、高、极高,其中高风险水平相关性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study" [Heliyon Volume 10, Issue 4, February 2024, Article e25912]. Retraction notice to "Enhancing data security and privacy in energy applications: Integrating IoT and blockchain technologies" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e38917]. Retraction notice to "CREB1 promotes cholangiocarcinoma metastasis through transcriptional regulation of the LAYN-mediated TLN1/β1 integrin axis" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36595]. Retraction notice to "Experimental investigations of dual functional substrate integrated waveguide antenna with enhanced directivity for 5G mobile communications" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36929]. Retraction notice to "Nutritional and bioactive properties and antioxidant potential of Amaranthus tricolor, A. lividus, A viridis, and A. spinosus leafy vegetables" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e30453].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1