Relative biological effectiveness of 31 meV thermal neutrons in peripheral blood lymphocytes.

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radiation protection dosimetry Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncae231
Laura C Paterson, Fawaz Ali, Mohsen Naseri, David Perez Loureiro, Amy Festarini, Marilyne Stuart, Chad Boyer, Ronald Rogge, Christie Costello, Norma Ybarra, John Kildea, Richard B Richardson
{"title":"Relative biological effectiveness of 31 meV thermal neutrons in peripheral blood lymphocytes.","authors":"Laura C Paterson, Fawaz Ali, Mohsen Naseri, David Perez Loureiro, Amy Festarini, Marilyne Stuart, Chad Boyer, Ronald Rogge, Christie Costello, Norma Ybarra, John Kildea, Richard B Richardson","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncae231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reported relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for thermal neutrons has a large range (5-51, for cytogenetic endpoints), which can confound radiation protection decision-making. To determine whether thermal neutron spectra can influence RBE, the RBE of reactor-derived thermal neutrons of average energy 31 meV was evaluated in human peripheral blood lymphocytes using two classical DNA double-strand break endpoints: the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Dose-response curves for 41 to 408 mGy revealed a preference for linear regression. Maximum RBE (RBEM) values of 6.7 ± 0.9 and 4.4 ± 0.7 were calculated for the DCA and the micronucleus assay, respectively. These 31 meV RBEM values were significantly lower than our prior results for 64 meV thermal neutrons, which yielded a DCA RBEM of 11.3 ± 1.6 and a micronucleus RBEM of 9.0 ± 1.1. Dose-specific RBE values decreased with increasing dose for both assays. Microdosimetry simulations demonstrated similar quality factor values for both thermal neutron spectra. Dose deposition differences on the cellular scale, the difference in dose rate between irradiation configurations, or a not-yet understood phenomenon may be responsible for the RBE difference between the 31 and 64 meV thermal spectra. These findings indicate that the currently accepted radiation weighting factor wR value of 2.5 for thermal neutrons may underestimate the radiation detriment to small or shallow tissue targets including the lens of the eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reported relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for thermal neutrons has a large range (5-51, for cytogenetic endpoints), which can confound radiation protection decision-making. To determine whether thermal neutron spectra can influence RBE, the RBE of reactor-derived thermal neutrons of average energy 31 meV was evaluated in human peripheral blood lymphocytes using two classical DNA double-strand break endpoints: the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Dose-response curves for 41 to 408 mGy revealed a preference for linear regression. Maximum RBE (RBEM) values of 6.7 ± 0.9 and 4.4 ± 0.7 were calculated for the DCA and the micronucleus assay, respectively. These 31 meV RBEM values were significantly lower than our prior results for 64 meV thermal neutrons, which yielded a DCA RBEM of 11.3 ± 1.6 and a micronucleus RBEM of 9.0 ± 1.1. Dose-specific RBE values decreased with increasing dose for both assays. Microdosimetry simulations demonstrated similar quality factor values for both thermal neutron spectra. Dose deposition differences on the cellular scale, the difference in dose rate between irradiation configurations, or a not-yet understood phenomenon may be responsible for the RBE difference between the 31 and 64 meV thermal spectra. These findings indicate that the currently accepted radiation weighting factor wR value of 2.5 for thermal neutrons may underestimate the radiation detriment to small or shallow tissue targets including the lens of the eye.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
期刊最新文献
Relative biological effectiveness of 31 meV thermal neutrons in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Assessment of radioactivity in soil samples from Wolaita Sodo town, Ethiopia: implications for environmental and public health. The 'fading' of thermoluminescence glow peaks: still more failures than successes. Evaluation of the self-shielding characteristics of an innovative radiosurgical system ZAP-X. Radiological safety assessment of monazite industry worker due to NORM inhalation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1