Outcomes of Primary Acquired Cholesteatoma Managed with Endoscopic-Microscopic Approaches According to EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO Classifications.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004461
Tyler J Gathman, Huong Dang, Nell Adams, Tajanae Henderson, Manuela Fina
{"title":"Outcomes of Primary Acquired Cholesteatoma Managed with Endoscopic-Microscopic Approaches According to EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO Classifications.","authors":"Tyler J Gathman, Huong Dang, Nell Adams, Tajanae Henderson, Manuela Fina","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the utility of the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology-Japanese Otological Society (EAONO-JOS) and SAMEO-ATO tympanomastoid surgery classification systems in predicting recidivistic disease in patients with primary acquired cholesteatoma and to compare outcomes between endoscopic and combined approaches.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-one surgical ears from 77 patients were operated on between 2015 and 2022 by the senior author and fit the inclusion criteria. Surgeries were retrospectively classified according to SAMEO-ATO and EAONO-JOS classifications. Descriptive statistics for staging and demographics were reported. Multivariate analysis was completed to assess the correlation between EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO classification and residual disease with covariates including age. The incidence of residual and recurrent disease was investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients had a median follow-up of 36.7 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on EAONO-JOS staging, 13.6% of ears were stage I, 65.4% were stage II, 21.0% were stage III, and 0% were stage IV. Exclusive endoscopic approaches (A1Mx, A1M2a, and A1M2b) were performed in 50.6% of all ears, and combined approaches (A4M1a, A4M1b, A4M1a + M2a, and A4M2c) in the remaining 49.4% of ears. Overall residual disease rate was 41.9% (n = 34), while recurrence occurred in 7.4% (n = 6). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, SAMEO-ATO and EAONO staging did not predict residual or recurrent disease. In multivariate analysis, age was correlated with a lower risk of residual disease for each advancing year (HR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, p < 0.01). Compared to combined approaches during primary surgery, exclusive endoscopic approaches were correlated with lower conversion to CWU or CWD mastoidectomy for revision surgery (HR 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05-0.71, p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of patients with primary acquired cholesteatoma, predominantly EAONO-JOS stage II and III, half were managed with an exclusive transcanal endoscopic approach. Although EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO did not predict recidivism, the classification is an important starting point for maintaining uniformity in collecting outcomes. The study was limited by a small sample size and limited follow-up duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"660-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the utility of the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology-Japanese Otological Society (EAONO-JOS) and SAMEO-ATO tympanomastoid surgery classification systems in predicting recidivistic disease in patients with primary acquired cholesteatoma and to compare outcomes between endoscopic and combined approaches.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Academic teaching hospital.

Methods: Eighty-one surgical ears from 77 patients were operated on between 2015 and 2022 by the senior author and fit the inclusion criteria. Surgeries were retrospectively classified according to SAMEO-ATO and EAONO-JOS classifications. Descriptive statistics for staging and demographics were reported. Multivariate analysis was completed to assess the correlation between EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO classification and residual disease with covariates including age. The incidence of residual and recurrent disease was investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients had a median follow-up of 36.7 months.

Results: Based on EAONO-JOS staging, 13.6% of ears were stage I, 65.4% were stage II, 21.0% were stage III, and 0% were stage IV. Exclusive endoscopic approaches (A1Mx, A1M2a, and A1M2b) were performed in 50.6% of all ears, and combined approaches (A4M1a, A4M1b, A4M1a + M2a, and A4M2c) in the remaining 49.4% of ears. Overall residual disease rate was 41.9% (n = 34), while recurrence occurred in 7.4% (n = 6). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, SAMEO-ATO and EAONO staging did not predict residual or recurrent disease. In multivariate analysis, age was correlated with a lower risk of residual disease for each advancing year (HR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, p < 0.01). Compared to combined approaches during primary surgery, exclusive endoscopic approaches were correlated with lower conversion to CWU or CWD mastoidectomy for revision surgery (HR 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05-0.71, p = 0.014).

Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with primary acquired cholesteatoma, predominantly EAONO-JOS stage II and III, half were managed with an exclusive transcanal endoscopic approach. Although EAONO-JOS and SAMEO-ATO did not predict recidivism, the classification is an important starting point for maintaining uniformity in collecting outcomes. The study was limited by a small sample size and limited follow-up duration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据EAONO-JOS和same - ato分类采用内镜-显微镜方法治疗原发性获得性胆脂瘤的结果。
目的:评估欧洲耳科和神经病学学会-日本耳科学会(EAONO-JOS)和SAMEO-ATO鼓室乳突手术分类系统在预测原发性获得性胆脂瘤患者复发性疾病中的应用,并比较内镜和联合入路的结果。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。单位:学术教学医院。方法:选取资深作者于2015 - 2022年间进行手术的77例患者81只手术耳,符合纳入标准。手术按照SAMEO-ATO和EAONO-JOS分类进行回顾性分类。报告了分期和人口统计学的描述性统计数据。完成多变量分析,评估EAONO-JOS和SAMEO-ATO分类和残留疾病与年龄等协变量的相关性。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析调查残留和复发疾病的发生率。患者的中位随访时间为36.7个月。结果:根据EAONO-JOS分期,13.6%的耳为I期,65.4%为II期,21.0%为III期,0%为IV期。50.6%的耳采用独家内镜入路(A1Mx、A1M2a和A1M2b),其余49.4%的耳采用联合入路(A4M1a、A4M1b、A4M1a + M2a和A4M2c)。总体残留率为41.9% (n = 34),复发率为7.4% (n = 6)。Kaplan-Meier分析中,SAMEO-ATO和EAONO分期不能预测残留或复发疾病。在多因素分析中,年龄与逐年降低的残留疾病风险相关(HR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, p < 0.01)。与初次手术时的联合入路相比,单独的内镜入路在翻修手术中转向CWU或CWD乳突切除术的可能性较低(HR 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05-0.71, p = 0.014)。结论:在这个原发性获得性胆脂瘤患者队列中,主要是EAONO-JOS II期和III期,一半的患者采用独家经鼻内镜入路治疗。虽然EAONO-JOS和SAMEO-ATO不能预测累犯,但分类是保持收集结果一致性的重要起点。该研究样本量小,随访时间有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Photon-Counting CT Enables Preoperative Diagnosis of Perilymphatic Fistula. Measurement of Cochlear Dimensions Using the Transimpedance Matrix. Total Ossicular Chain Reconstruction: Is Autologous Material Better Than a TORP? Titanium Allergy: An Uncommon Cause of Pain in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Elevation of Serum Prestin in Patients With Tinnitus: Pathophysiological Implications and Biomarker Potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1