Outcome of Patients with IDH-mutated AML following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation - a Retrospective Analysis on behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.018
Thomas Schroeder, Sarah Flossdorf, Claudia Schuh, Caroline Pabst, Michael Stadler, Johannes Schetelig, Claudia Wehr, Matthias Stelljes, Elisa Sala, Andreas Burchert, Julia Winkler, H Christian Reinhardt, Nicolaus Kröger, Katharina Fleischhauer, Christina Rautenberg
{"title":"Outcome of Patients with IDH-mutated AML following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation - a Retrospective Analysis on behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST.","authors":"Thomas Schroeder, Sarah Flossdorf, Claudia Schuh, Caroline Pabst, Michael Stadler, Johannes Schetelig, Claudia Wehr, Matthias Stelljes, Elisa Sala, Andreas Burchert, Julia Winkler, H Christian Reinhardt, Nicolaus Kröger, Katharina Fleischhauer, Christina Rautenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1 and IDH2) are found in 15% to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IDH inhibitors have been introduced as targeted treatment and are currently under investigation as maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT). Since reports about the outcome of IDH1- and IDH2-mutated (IDHmut) AML after allo-SCT are limited, we retrospectively analyzed 356 IDH-mutated AML patients (IDH1 40%, IDH2 60%). Ten patients (4%) had received an IDH inhibitor prior transplantation, but none had received maintenance with IDH inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 24 months 3-year probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the entire cohort were 73%, 60%, 27% and 13% respectively. While 3-year OS (78% vs 70%), EFS (56% vs. 63%) and NRM (10% vs 14%) rates were similar for IDH1mut and IDH2mut patients, relapse incidence was numerically higher in IDH1mut patients (34% vs. 24%) and landmark analysis suggested a continuous rise of relapse incidence preferentially in IDH1mut AML also beyond the first year. Concordantly, IDH2 mutation was associated with superior EFS and by trend with lower relapse incidence. The strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes, however, was AML not in CR. This analysis provides benchmarks for interpretation of results emerging from post-transplant maintenance trials in IDHmut AML and suggest that maintenance strategies may further optimize the promising outcome in this molecularly defined subgroup by reducing relapse risk, especially for patients whose AML is not in remission at time of alloHCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1 and IDH2) are found in 15% to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IDH inhibitors have been introduced as targeted treatment and are currently under investigation as maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT). Since reports about the outcome of IDH1- and IDH2-mutated (IDHmut) AML after allo-SCT are limited, we retrospectively analyzed 356 IDH-mutated AML patients (IDH1 40%, IDH2 60%). Ten patients (4%) had received an IDH inhibitor prior transplantation, but none had received maintenance with IDH inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 24 months 3-year probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) for the entire cohort were 73%, 60%, 27% and 13% respectively. While 3-year OS (78% vs 70%), EFS (56% vs. 63%) and NRM (10% vs 14%) rates were similar for IDH1mut and IDH2mut patients, relapse incidence was numerically higher in IDH1mut patients (34% vs. 24%) and landmark analysis suggested a continuous rise of relapse incidence preferentially in IDH1mut AML also beyond the first year. Concordantly, IDH2 mutation was associated with superior EFS and by trend with lower relapse incidence. The strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes, however, was AML not in CR. This analysis provides benchmarks for interpretation of results emerging from post-transplant maintenance trials in IDHmut AML and suggest that maintenance strategies may further optimize the promising outcome in this molecularly defined subgroup by reducing relapse risk, especially for patients whose AML is not in remission at time of alloHCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Best Practices in Gene Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease and Transfusion-dependent β-Thalassemia. Outcome of Patients with IDH-mutated AML following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation - a Retrospective Analysis on behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST. Temporal evolution of functional immune reconstitution after allogeneic HSCT. Clinical Outcome of UCBT for Children with CAEBV: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single Center. Efficacy of Pomalidomide on Motor Performance and Functional Abilities in Patients with Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft versus Host Disease: A Randomized Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1