Abnormal Urine Drug Screens in Pregnancy- Opportunity for Laboratory Stewardship.

Q2 Medicine Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01
Anil K Chokkalla, Sahil Malik, Ridwan Ibrahim, Sridevi Devaraj
{"title":"Abnormal Urine Drug Screens in Pregnancy- Opportunity for Laboratory Stewardship.","authors":"Anil K Chokkalla, Sahil Malik, Ridwan Ibrahim, Sridevi Devaraj","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical testing for drugs of abuse typically involves initial screening followed by confirmatory testing. Due to limited evidence-based guidelines, the healthcare provider makes the decision to confirm abnormal screens based on the clinical context. This two-step approach proved to be inadequate in scenarios like maternal substance abuse and subsequent fetal/ newborn exposure. The goal of this study is to assess and improve the confirmatory testing rate of abnormal screens among pregnant patients at our women's center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the confirmation rates among positively screened pregnant patients, and a lab stewardship initiative was implemented to remind ordering physicians about the importance of confirmatory drug tests. Abnormal screens were classified as expected positives based on the medication-related interference, social history and self-reported substance use from the provider notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 28% of pregnant patients with unexpected positive drug screens underwent confirmatory testing during the pre- intervention period, which rose significantly to 67% during the post-intervention period. Furthermore, outcome analysis revealed that 50% of patients with concordant confirmatory test results were referred to social work and psychiatry in the post-intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the value of laboratory stewardship in optimizing drug testing practices for pregnant patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical testing for drugs of abuse typically involves initial screening followed by confirmatory testing. Due to limited evidence-based guidelines, the healthcare provider makes the decision to confirm abnormal screens based on the clinical context. This two-step approach proved to be inadequate in scenarios like maternal substance abuse and subsequent fetal/ newborn exposure. The goal of this study is to assess and improve the confirmatory testing rate of abnormal screens among pregnant patients at our women's center.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the confirmation rates among positively screened pregnant patients, and a lab stewardship initiative was implemented to remind ordering physicians about the importance of confirmatory drug tests. Abnormal screens were classified as expected positives based on the medication-related interference, social history and self-reported substance use from the provider notes.

Results: Only 28% of pregnant patients with unexpected positive drug screens underwent confirmatory testing during the pre- intervention period, which rose significantly to 67% during the post-intervention period. Furthermore, outcome analysis revealed that 50% of patients with concordant confirmatory test results were referred to social work and psychiatry in the post-intervention period.

Conclusions: This study highlights the value of laboratory stewardship in optimizing drug testing practices for pregnant patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abnormal Urine Drug Screens in Pregnancy- Opportunity for Laboratory Stewardship. Biomarkers for Harmful Alcohol Use should be Reliable, Standardised, and Traceable: Only the CDT reference method has been approved by JCTLM and IFCC. A Rare Pure Calcite Urolithiasis Confirmed by Infrared Spectroscopy. Highlights from the Manifesto on Early Detection and Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Laboratory Tests and Emerging Technologies. Implosion of Grail's Galleri Cancer Screening Test?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1