Comparative Study of Vault Measurement by Pentacam, Casia2, and RTVue in Myopic Eyes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S499777
Fang Liu, Yijia Xu, Yuhao Ye, Zhe Zhang, Lingling Niu, Peijun Yao, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou, Jing Zhao
{"title":"Comparative Study of Vault Measurement by Pentacam, Casia2, and RTVue in Myopic Eyes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.","authors":"Fang Liu, Yijia Xu, Yuhao Ye, Zhe Zhang, Lingling Niu, Peijun Yao, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou, Jing Zhao","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S499777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare vault measurement using Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and two optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments, Casia2 (Tomey Corporation, Japan) and RTVue (Optovue Inc. USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative study recruited 95 eyes of 50 patients (mean age: 28.40±4.51, male/female 15/35) who underwent implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation for myopia correction. All patients underwent a series of ophthalmic examinations at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and the vault was measured using three instruments in the same order at both follow-ups. Intraclass coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze intra-equipment reproducibility and agreement between two instruments. A multivariate regression model was used to analyze the factors influencing the vault differences between the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC values for intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of each piece of equipment were above 0.9. The ICC values and mean differences of vault measurement of Casia2 vs Pentacam, Casia2 vs RTVue, and RTVue vs Pentacam were 0.763 and 139.81 μm, 0.960 and -17.18 μm, 0.739 and 151.86 μm, respectively. An average of 96.2% of the points fell within the limit of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots. No difference was found in the inter-device agreement between the 3- and 6-month vaults. The difference in pupil diameter, anterior chamber depth, and anterior chamber angle could influence the vault difference between the Pentacam and the two OCT instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three instruments demonstrated good intra-equipment reproducibility. Casia2 and RTVue showed excellent agreement in the vault measurements. The Pentacam's vault readings were significantly lower than those measured by Casia2 and RTVue; therefore, their vault measurements were not interchangeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"17 ","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S499777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare vault measurement using Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and two optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments, Casia2 (Tomey Corporation, Japan) and RTVue (Optovue Inc. USA).

Methods: This comparative study recruited 95 eyes of 50 patients (mean age: 28.40±4.51, male/female 15/35) who underwent implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation for myopia correction. All patients underwent a series of ophthalmic examinations at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and the vault was measured using three instruments in the same order at both follow-ups. Intraclass coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze intra-equipment reproducibility and agreement between two instruments. A multivariate regression model was used to analyze the factors influencing the vault differences between the devices.

Results: The ICC values for intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of each piece of equipment were above 0.9. The ICC values and mean differences of vault measurement of Casia2 vs Pentacam, Casia2 vs RTVue, and RTVue vs Pentacam were 0.763 and 139.81 μm, 0.960 and -17.18 μm, 0.739 and 151.86 μm, respectively. An average of 96.2% of the points fell within the limit of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots. No difference was found in the inter-device agreement between the 3- and 6-month vaults. The difference in pupil diameter, anterior chamber depth, and anterior chamber angle could influence the vault difference between the Pentacam and the two OCT instruments.

Conclusion: All three instruments demonstrated good intra-equipment reproducibility. Casia2 and RTVue showed excellent agreement in the vault measurements. The Pentacam's vault readings were significantly lower than those measured by Casia2 and RTVue; therefore, their vault measurements were not interchangeable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pentacam、Casia2、RTVue在近视人工晶状体植入术后测量拱顶的比较研究。
目的:比较使用Pentacam(德国Oculus公司)和两种光学相干层析成像(OCT)仪器Casia2(日本Tomey公司)和RTVue (Optovue公司)测量穹窿的方法。美国)。方法:采用人工晶状体植入术(ICL)矫正近视的患者50例95眼(平均年龄28.40±4.51,男/女15/35)进行对比研究。所有患者在术后3个月和6个月接受了一系列眼科检查,在两次随访中使用三种仪器按相同顺序测量穹窿。使用类内系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图分析两台仪器之间的重复性和一致性。采用多元回归模型分析影响两种设备间保险差异的因素。结果:每件设备的观察者内部和观察者之间的重复性ICC值均在0.9以上。Casia2与Pentacam、Casia2与RTVue、RTVue与Pentacam的穹顶测量ICC值和平均差值分别为0.763和139.81 μm、0.960和-17.18 μm、0.739和151.86 μm。在Bland-Altman图中,平均有96.2%的点落在一致的范围内。在3个月和6个月的保险库之间没有发现设备间协议的差异。瞳孔直径、前房深度和前房角度的差异会影响Pentacam与两种OCT仪器的穹窿差异。结论:三种仪器均具有良好的设备内重现性。Casia2和RTVue在拱顶测量中表现出极好的一致性。Pentacam的拱顶读数明显低于Casia2和RTVue;因此,它们的拱顶尺寸是不可互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
期刊最新文献
How Do Optometrists Approach Directed Questioning on Smoking Status in a Centrally Co-Ordinated, Publicly-Funded National Primary Care Eye Health Service? Macular, Foveal and RNFL Thickness Patterns in Amblyopia: A Comparative Study. Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness and Tear Film Stability After Carboxymethyl Cellulose Use in Young Adults with High Screen Time Exposure. Assessment of Dry Eye Disease Symptoms in Health Science University Students: A Combined Approach Using CVS-Q and Schirmer Tear Test to Evaluate the Influence of Digital Devices. A Pilot Study of Retinal Vessel Calibre and Its Potential Link to Cardiovascular Risk in HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1