Cue Detection and Self-Debriefing Techniques in Virtual Simulation: Techniques Using Cognitive Engineering Inspired Expertise Development Approaches.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000851
Yan Xiao, Regina W Urban, Jennifer L Roye, Mary Beth Reid, John Schmitt, Joseph Borders, Gary Klein, Mary E Mancini
{"title":"Cue Detection and Self-Debriefing Techniques in Virtual Simulation: Techniques Using Cognitive Engineering Inspired Expertise Development Approaches.","authors":"Yan Xiao, Regina W Urban, Jennifer L Roye, Mary Beth Reid, John Schmitt, Joseph Borders, Gary Klein, Mary E Mancini","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Online experiential learning can benefit learners with scalable techniques to self-debrief and to develop cognitive skills in recognizing clinical cues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed techniques for cue-detection exercises and self-debriefing, based on cognitive engineering-inspired expertise development approaches that focus on tacit knowledge, sensemaking, and mental models. Self-debriefing was structured by asking the learners to compare and then reflect on their choices and rationales against those provided by a panel of experts. Using these techniques, we generated scenario-based experiential learning materials in a virtual environment for a 2-hour module on deteriorating patient conditions that can lead to imminent cardiac arrests. The module was tested in a senior nursing course as an optional assignment. The volume of voluntarily submitted reflections by learners was used to assess engagement and subsequent thematic analysis to assess feasibility of the techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The module was completed by 189 of the 197 students invited (95.9%). Engagement level was high with all completed students submitting reflections after self-debriefing, most of which (between 53.4% and 87.8%) were specific enough for thematic analysis. The main theme of reflections was \"missing something\" in the scenario, followed by the themes of importance of reading the patient monitor and refining actions and priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility of the techniques based on cognitive engineering-inspired approaches for virtual simulation learning in health care that structures self-debriefing by comparing a learner's situation assessment and responses with those of experts. The techniques have the potential to help learners in health care efficiently and consistently develop key critical thinking skills, especially those based on tacit knowledge to detect cues.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"324-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Online experiential learning can benefit learners with scalable techniques to self-debrief and to develop cognitive skills in recognizing clinical cues.

Methods: We developed techniques for cue-detection exercises and self-debriefing, based on cognitive engineering-inspired expertise development approaches that focus on tacit knowledge, sensemaking, and mental models. Self-debriefing was structured by asking the learners to compare and then reflect on their choices and rationales against those provided by a panel of experts. Using these techniques, we generated scenario-based experiential learning materials in a virtual environment for a 2-hour module on deteriorating patient conditions that can lead to imminent cardiac arrests. The module was tested in a senior nursing course as an optional assignment. The volume of voluntarily submitted reflections by learners was used to assess engagement and subsequent thematic analysis to assess feasibility of the techniques.

Results: The module was completed by 189 of the 197 students invited (95.9%). Engagement level was high with all completed students submitting reflections after self-debriefing, most of which (between 53.4% and 87.8%) were specific enough for thematic analysis. The main theme of reflections was "missing something" in the scenario, followed by the themes of importance of reading the patient monitor and refining actions and priorities.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of the techniques based on cognitive engineering-inspired approaches for virtual simulation learning in health care that structures self-debriefing by comparing a learner's situation assessment and responses with those of experts. The techniques have the potential to help learners in health care efficiently and consistently develop key critical thinking skills, especially those based on tacit knowledge to detect cues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟仿真中的线索检测和自我汇报技术:使用认知工程启发的专业知识开发方法的技术。
在线体验式学习可以使学习者受益于可扩展的自我汇报技术,并发展识别临床线索的认知技能。方法:基于认知工程启发的专业知识开发方法,我们开发了线索检测练习和自我述职的技术,这些方法侧重于隐性知识、意义构建和心理模型。自我汇报的结构是要求学习者比较和反思他们的选择和根据专家小组提供的理由。使用这些技术,我们在虚拟环境中生成了基于场景的体验式学习材料,该模块为2小时,内容是患者病情恶化可能导致即将发生的心脏骤停。该模块在高级护理课程中作为可选作业进行了测试。学习者自愿提交的反思量被用来评估参与程度,随后的专题分析被用来评估这些技术的可行性。结果:197名受邀学生中189人(95.9%)完成了该模块。参与水平很高,所有完成任务的学生在自我汇报后提交了反思,其中大多数(53.4%至87.8%)足够具体,可以进行主题分析。反思的主题是场景中“缺失的东西”,其次是阅读病人监护仪和改进行动和优先事项的重要性。结论:我们证明了基于认知工程启发的医疗保健虚拟模拟学习方法的可行性,该方法通过比较学习者的情况评估和专家的反应来构建自我汇报。这些技术有可能帮助医疗保健学习者有效和持续地发展关键的批判性思维技能,特别是那些基于隐性知识来发现线索的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Harassment as Bystanders: A Thematic Analysis of Internal Medicine Residents' Responses in Simulation-Based Training During Simulation After Video-Based Training. Bridging the Gap: Structured Simulation-Based Pulmonary Ultrasound Training for Internal Medicine Residents. The Ripple Effect of Readiness: How Simulation Changed One Patient's Story. Assessment of the Effect of Various Teaching Strategies on Medical Students' Skills, Attitudes, and Comfort During Gynecological Examinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Identification of Key Performance Indicators in Simulation-Based Studies for Hospital-Wide Efficiency: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1