Prior authorization and utilization management for post-acute home health in Medicare Advantage: the motivations, players, processes, unique challenges, and impacts on patient care.

IF 2.7 Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf020
Kali S Thomas, Marguerite Daus, Christine Jones, Jennifer N Bunker, Jamie M Smith, Jeffrey Marr, Emily A Gadbois
{"title":"Prior authorization and utilization management for post-acute home health in Medicare Advantage: the motivations, players, processes, unique challenges, and impacts on patient care.","authors":"Kali S Thomas, Marguerite Daus, Christine Jones, Jennifer N Bunker, Jamie M Smith, Jeffrey Marr, Emily A Gadbois","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2024, 90% of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees were in a plan that required prior authorization of home health care. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 leaders of MA plans, post-acute care (PAC) management companies, and home health agencies (HHAs) across the country to understand their experiences with prior authorization and utilization management (UM) of post-acute home health care. Our analysis of these interviews revealed that representatives of MA plans and PAC management companies report varying motives and approaches to prior authorization for post-acute home health care, resulting in varied experiences for HHAs. Both MA plan and HHA representatives view prior authorization and UM of post-acute home health as burdensome, and each have taken distinct approaches to manage the process but have conflicting views on the utility of these approaches. Home health agency representatives report that prior authorization and UM requirements impact access to care, the way that care is delivered, and ultimately patients' experiences. Our findings warrant additional research and policy attention so that MA plans' UM techniques do not unintentionally cause patient harm, particularly among vulnerable Medicare enrollees in need of post-acute home health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 3","pages":"qxaf020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2024, 90% of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees were in a plan that required prior authorization of home health care. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 leaders of MA plans, post-acute care (PAC) management companies, and home health agencies (HHAs) across the country to understand their experiences with prior authorization and utilization management (UM) of post-acute home health care. Our analysis of these interviews revealed that representatives of MA plans and PAC management companies report varying motives and approaches to prior authorization for post-acute home health care, resulting in varied experiences for HHAs. Both MA plan and HHA representatives view prior authorization and UM of post-acute home health as burdensome, and each have taken distinct approaches to manage the process but have conflicting views on the utility of these approaches. Home health agency representatives report that prior authorization and UM requirements impact access to care, the way that care is delivered, and ultimately patients' experiences. Our findings warrant additional research and policy attention so that MA plans' UM techniques do not unintentionally cause patient harm, particularly among vulnerable Medicare enrollees in need of post-acute home health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险优势中急性后家庭健康的事前授权和利用管理:动机、参与者、过程、独特挑战和对患者护理的影响。
2024年,90%的医疗保险优势(MA)参保人参加了一项需要事先获得家庭医疗保健授权的计划。我们对全国44位MA计划、急症后护理(PAC)管理公司和家庭健康机构(HHAs)的负责人进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们在急症后家庭健康护理的事先授权和使用管理(UM)方面的经验。我们对这些访谈的分析显示,MA计划和PAC管理公司的代表报告了不同的动机和方法来预先授权急性后家庭保健,导致hha的经验不同。MA计划和HHA的代表都认为事先授权和急性后家庭健康管理是一项繁重的工作,双方都采取了不同的方法来管理这一过程,但对这些方法的实用性有不同的看法。家庭保健机构代表报告说,事先授权和UM要求影响到获得护理的机会、提供护理的方式,并最终影响到患者的体验。我们的发现需要进一步的研究和政策关注,以便MA计划的UM技术不会无意中造成患者伤害,特别是在需要急性后家庭医疗保健的弱势医疗保险参保者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reporting rates of topped-out merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) quality measures, 2017-2023. Racial disparities in drug toxicology testing among pregnant women & infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review. The changing Part D landscape. Workplace violence against nurses is a patient safety crisis, not "part of the job". Variation in supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage affinity plans, 2022-2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1