Analysis and prediction of backfat thickness in gestating sows using machine learning algorithms

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2025.100875
Xuewu Peng , Yaxin Song , Yuanfei Zhou , Hongkui Wei , Siwen Jiang , Fukang Wei , Xinran Li , Jian Peng
{"title":"Analysis and prediction of backfat thickness in gestating sows using machine learning algorithms","authors":"Xuewu Peng ,&nbsp;Yaxin Song ,&nbsp;Yuanfei Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongkui Wei ,&nbsp;Siwen Jiang ,&nbsp;Fukang Wei ,&nbsp;Xinran Li ,&nbsp;Jian Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sow backfat (BF) thickness is a key indicator for predicting the nutrient requirements and influencing on reproductive performance of gestating sows. The purpose of this study was to determine feature importance for healthy piglets, define the optimal BF at farrowing and change trend of BF during gestation, as well as to establish the prediction models of BF in gestating sows using 10 machine learning (ML) models. A database with 64,298 observations including 3 categorical and 18 numerical features was used for data analysis and modeling. Compared to other features, BF at farrowing was the most important feature for healthy piglets. The optimal BF at farrowing of parity 1, 2, and ≥3 was 18 mm, 16 mm, and 16 mm, respectively, and the early to middle stage of gestation was the best period for body condition restoration. The eXtreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) exhibited best prediction performance with lowest RMSE (30d, 60d, 90d and farrowing of gestation were 1.17, 1.09, 1.01 and 0.81 mm, respectively) and MAPE (30d, 60d, 90d and farrowing of gestation were 5.57 %, 4.93 %, 4.44 % and 3.54 %, respectively), showing best accuracy and stability among the 10 ML models. The analysis and prediction of BF during gestation based on ML methods provide technical support for accurately predicting nutrient requirements and formulating precise feeding strategy of gestating sows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100875"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500108X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sow backfat (BF) thickness is a key indicator for predicting the nutrient requirements and influencing on reproductive performance of gestating sows. The purpose of this study was to determine feature importance for healthy piglets, define the optimal BF at farrowing and change trend of BF during gestation, as well as to establish the prediction models of BF in gestating sows using 10 machine learning (ML) models. A database with 64,298 observations including 3 categorical and 18 numerical features was used for data analysis and modeling. Compared to other features, BF at farrowing was the most important feature for healthy piglets. The optimal BF at farrowing of parity 1, 2, and ≥3 was 18 mm, 16 mm, and 16 mm, respectively, and the early to middle stage of gestation was the best period for body condition restoration. The eXtreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) exhibited best prediction performance with lowest RMSE (30d, 60d, 90d and farrowing of gestation were 1.17, 1.09, 1.01 and 0.81 mm, respectively) and MAPE (30d, 60d, 90d and farrowing of gestation were 5.57 %, 4.93 %, 4.44 % and 3.54 %, respectively), showing best accuracy and stability among the 10 ML models. The analysis and prediction of BF during gestation based on ML methods provide technical support for accurately predicting nutrient requirements and formulating precise feeding strategy of gestating sows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WeedsSORT: A weed tracking-by-detection framework for laser weeding applications within precision agriculture Unmanned aerial systems (UAS)-based field high throughput phenotyping (HTP) as plant breeders’ toolbox: A comprehensive review Research progress of non-destructive testing techniques in moisture content determination A non-linear dynamic model for agricultural vehicles constructed in digital space Dynamic growth tomato inflorescence modeling with elastic mechanics data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1