Forty Years of Couple Therapy Process Research and We Are Still Just Getting Started: A Review of Quantitative Research

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of marital and family therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1111/jmft.70013
Jared R. Anderson, Brady C. Eisert, Ju Ann Kim, Hamidreza Fereidouni, Maria F. Portillo, Moloud Sivandian, Paul Zehr
{"title":"Forty Years of Couple Therapy Process Research and We Are Still Just Getting Started: A Review of Quantitative Research","authors":"Jared R. Anderson,&nbsp;Brady C. Eisert,&nbsp;Ju Ann Kim,&nbsp;Hamidreza Fereidouni,&nbsp;Maria F. Portillo,&nbsp;Moloud Sivandian,&nbsp;Paul Zehr","doi":"10.1111/jmft.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Can empirical research guide clinicians in how to conduct effective couple therapy? While we know that couple therapy works, understanding the mechanisms of action—how and why it works—has been the focus of research for several decades. Using Doss's framework for understanding the key components of the change process—therapy change processes, client change processes, mediators, and outcomes—we reviewed 48 quantitative couple therapy process studies over a 40-year period. The results reveal a fragmented knowledge base. No single study examines the entire process of change, and although several findings show promise, none have been replicated. Additionally, only a limited number of hypothesized associations achieved statistical significance, with neither theory nor empirical evidence adequately explaining why some hypotheses were supported while others were not. Current couple therapy process research <i>cannot</i> yet guide clinicians on <i>how</i> to conduct effective therapy. Until it does, the divide between research and practice will persist.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of marital and family therapy","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of marital and family therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can empirical research guide clinicians in how to conduct effective couple therapy? While we know that couple therapy works, understanding the mechanisms of action—how and why it works—has been the focus of research for several decades. Using Doss's framework for understanding the key components of the change process—therapy change processes, client change processes, mediators, and outcomes—we reviewed 48 quantitative couple therapy process studies over a 40-year period. The results reveal a fragmented knowledge base. No single study examines the entire process of change, and although several findings show promise, none have been replicated. Additionally, only a limited number of hypothesized associations achieved statistical significance, with neither theory nor empirical evidence adequately explaining why some hypotheses were supported while others were not. Current couple therapy process research cannot yet guide clinicians on how to conduct effective therapy. Until it does, the divide between research and practice will persist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实证研究能否指导临床医生如何进行有效的夫妻治疗?尽管我们知道夫妻疗法是有效的,但了解其作用机制--如何以及为何有效--一直是几十年来研究的重点。利用多斯的框架来理解改变过程的关键组成部分--治疗改变过程、客户改变过程、中介和结果--我们回顾了 40 年间的 48 项定量夫妻治疗过程研究。研究结果表明,知识基础是支离破碎的。没有一项研究对整个改变过程进行了研究,尽管有几项研究结果表明了改变的前景,但没有一项研究结果得到了重复。此外,只有数量有限的假设关联达到了统计意义上的显著性,理论和经验证据都无法充分解释为什么有些假设得到了支持,而有些却没有。目前的夫妻治疗过程研究还不能指导临床医生如何进行有效的治疗。在此之前,研究与实践之间的鸿沟将持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marital & Family Therapy (JMFT) is published quarterly by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy and is one of the best known and most influential family therapy journals in the world. JMFT is a peer-reviewed journal that advances the professional understanding of marital and family functioning and the most effective psychotherapeutic treatment of couple and family distress. Toward that end, the Journal publishes articles on research, theory, clinical practice, and training in marital and family therapy.
期刊最新文献
Forty Years of Couple Therapy Process Research and We Are Still Just Getting Started: A Review of Quantitative Research Identifying Informal Help-Seeking Patterns in African American Couples Myths of Romantic Love, Negative Interactions, Relationship Involvement, Satisfaction, Infidelity, and Jealousy in Peruvian Individuals With Couples: Directed and Undirected Network Analysis Is Our Attachment Hurting Us? Unraveling the Associations Between Partners' Attachment Pairings, Negative Emotions During Conflict, and Intimate Partner Violence Relational Teaching in Mental Health Education: A 20-Year Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1