Septic shock upon admission to pediatric intensive care units: prognostic analysis of mortality in a retrospective cohort.

Ricardo Rodriguez-Portilla, Isabel Pinedo-Torres, Claudia C Guerra-Ríos, Angela Parra Del Riego-Freundt-Thurne, Nilton Yhuri-Carreazo
{"title":"Septic shock upon admission to pediatric intensive care units: prognostic analysis of mortality in a retrospective cohort.","authors":"Ricardo Rodriguez-Portilla, Isabel Pinedo-Torres, Claudia C Guerra-Ríos, Angela Parra Del Riego-Freundt-Thurne, Nilton Yhuri-Carreazo","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.24000056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic shock is a common cause of admission to pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and is associated with significant mortality. Our objective was to analyze the association between septic shock diagnosis at PICU admission and mortality during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the PICU of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) in Lima, Peru, from January 2018 to December 2021. The sample size was determined based on annual mortality rates, and randomization was used to create two groups: patients with and without septic shock. To evaluate mortality risk, we performed a Poisson regression with robust variances and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both crude and adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,341 patients admitted to the PICU during the study period, 358 were included in the analysis. The study population was 51.9% female, with a median age of 3.7 years. The largest age group was children under 1 year, comprising 29.6% of participants. The septic shock group showed higher rates of mechanical ventilation requirement, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality. The risk of mortality was 2.73 times higher in patients admitted with septic shock compared to those admitted with other diagnoses (relative risks: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.36-5.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients admitted to the PICU with septic shock demonstrated a 2.73 times higher risk of death compared to those admitted for other reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"82 1","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.24000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is a common cause of admission to pediatric intensive care units (PICU) and is associated with significant mortality. Our objective was to analyze the association between septic shock diagnosis at PICU admission and mortality during hospitalization.

Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the PICU of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) in Lima, Peru, from January 2018 to December 2021. The sample size was determined based on annual mortality rates, and randomization was used to create two groups: patients with and without septic shock. To evaluate mortality risk, we performed a Poisson regression with robust variances and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both crude and adjusted models.

Results: Of 1,341 patients admitted to the PICU during the study period, 358 were included in the analysis. The study population was 51.9% female, with a median age of 3.7 years. The largest age group was children under 1 year, comprising 29.6% of participants. The septic shock group showed higher rates of mechanical ventilation requirement, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality. The risk of mortality was 2.73 times higher in patients admitted with septic shock compared to those admitted with other diagnoses (relative risks: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.36-5.46).

Conclusion: Patients admitted to the PICU with septic shock demonstrated a 2.73 times higher risk of death compared to those admitted for other reasons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童重症监护病房入院时的感染性休克:回顾性队列中死亡率的预后分析。
背景:感染性休克是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的常见原因,并与显著的死亡率相关。我们的目的是分析PICU入院时脓毒性休克诊断与住院期间死亡率之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究于2018年1月至2021年12月在秘鲁利马国家Edgardo Rebagliati Martins医院(HNERM)的PICU进行。样本量根据年死亡率确定,并采用随机化方法创建两组:感染性休克患者和非感染性休克患者。为了评估死亡风险,我们使用粗模型和调整模型进行了具有稳健方差和95%置信区间(CI)的泊松回归。结果:在研究期间入住PICU的1,341例患者中,358例被纳入分析。研究人群中女性占51.9%,中位年龄为3.7岁。最大的年龄组是1岁以下的儿童,占参与者的29.6%。感染性休克组需要机械通气的比率较高,住院时间较长,死亡率增加。感染性休克患者的死亡风险是其他诊断患者的2.73倍(相对风险:2.73;95% ci: 1.36-5.46)。结论:感染性休克入住PICU的患者死亡风险是因其他原因入住的患者的2.73倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Hybrid congenital lung malformation: case report. Distribution of childhood cancer types using the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition classification in a tertiary hospital in northwest Mexico. Familial intrahepatic cholestasis: consensus recommendations for healthcare professionals in Latin America. Abdominal mass secondary to fetus-in-fetu in a neonate: case report and literature review. Associated comorbidities in pediatric patients with alopecia areata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1