Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Research Protocols Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.2196/57590
Andrés Rojas-Cárdenas, Shaun Cleaver, Ivan Sarmiento, Julie Rock, Yan Grenier, Francis Charrier, Rose-Anne Gosselin, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson
{"title":"Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review.","authors":"Andrés Rojas-Cárdenas, Shaun Cleaver, Ivan Sarmiento, Julie Rock, Yan Grenier, Francis Charrier, Rose-Anne Gosselin, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson","doi":"10.2196/57590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous people do not necessarily view disability in the same way as do other groups. Indigenous concepts of disability are connected to their ancestral history, cultural customs, and environmental context. Some Indigenous languages do not contain a word equivalent to disability. Western approaches to disability seldom reflect the voices of Indigenous people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to collate the perspectives, concepts, and understandings of disability in Indigenous communities in Canada and to map the factors that influence social approaches to disability from an Indigenous perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the methodological framework for scoping reviews of Arksey and O'Malley, we will search electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost ProQuest, Autochtonia, and APA PsycINFO. We will search gray literature through the Google search engine, conference abstracts, dissertation databases, government documents, and Indigenous organization websites. We will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies in English and French. The included studies will describe Indigenous approaches to disability, as they are understood based on personal, cultural, and historical contexts. Two reviewers will use Covidence software (Cochrane) to remove duplicates, screen articles, record the step-by-step selection process, and extract data from the included articles. We will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We will present the findings in tables, charts, narrative summaries, and through fuzzy cognitive mapping. We will contextualize the literature's findings by comparing them with the stakeholders in Quebec and provide a discussion to explore potential solutions for the identified factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial limited search was conducted in January 2024. The study will be conducted in 2025. Publication of the results is expected in late 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We anticipate that the findings from the scoping review will be useful for professionals, researchers, policy makers, and Indigenous communities themselves interested in co-designing and implementing evidence-informed disability programs and services, which will prevent mismatches between the programs and the sociocultural context. We will disseminate the results of this review through workshops with the participating communities, direct engagement with relevant local stakeholders, and through conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>OSF Registries osf.io/9rzkx; https://osf.io/9rzkx.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/57590.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e57590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indigenous people do not necessarily view disability in the same way as do other groups. Indigenous concepts of disability are connected to their ancestral history, cultural customs, and environmental context. Some Indigenous languages do not contain a word equivalent to disability. Western approaches to disability seldom reflect the voices of Indigenous people.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to collate the perspectives, concepts, and understandings of disability in Indigenous communities in Canada and to map the factors that influence social approaches to disability from an Indigenous perspective.

Methods: Following the methodological framework for scoping reviews of Arksey and O'Malley, we will search electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost ProQuest, Autochtonia, and APA PsycINFO. We will search gray literature through the Google search engine, conference abstracts, dissertation databases, government documents, and Indigenous organization websites. We will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies in English and French. The included studies will describe Indigenous approaches to disability, as they are understood based on personal, cultural, and historical contexts. Two reviewers will use Covidence software (Cochrane) to remove duplicates, screen articles, record the step-by-step selection process, and extract data from the included articles. We will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We will present the findings in tables, charts, narrative summaries, and through fuzzy cognitive mapping. We will contextualize the literature's findings by comparing them with the stakeholders in Quebec and provide a discussion to explore potential solutions for the identified factors.

Results: An initial limited search was conducted in January 2024. The study will be conducted in 2025. Publication of the results is expected in late 2025.

Conclusions: We anticipate that the findings from the scoping review will be useful for professionals, researchers, policy makers, and Indigenous communities themselves interested in co-designing and implementing evidence-informed disability programs and services, which will prevent mismatches between the programs and the sociocultural context. We will disseminate the results of this review through workshops with the participating communities, direct engagement with relevant local stakeholders, and through conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.

Trial registration: OSF Registries osf.io/9rzkx; https://osf.io/9rzkx.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/57590.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大土著社区对残疾的看法:范围审查议定书。
背景:土著人民不一定以与其他群体相同的方式看待残疾。土著对残疾的概念与他们祖先的历史、文化习俗和环境背景有关。有些土著语言中没有相当于残疾的词。西方对待残疾的方式很少反映土著人民的声音。目的:这一范围审查的目的是整理加拿大土著社区对残疾的观点、概念和理解,并从土著的角度绘制影响社会对待残疾方式的因素。方法:按照Arksey和O'Malley的范围综述的方法学框架,我们将检索电子数据库,包括PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost ProQuest, Autochtonia和APA PsycINFO。我们将通过谷歌搜索引擎、会议摘要、论文数据库、政府文件和土著组织网站搜索灰色文献。我们将包括英语和法语的定量、定性和混合方法研究。所包括的研究将描述基于个人、文化和历史背景理解的土著对待残疾的方法。两名审稿人将使用covid软件(Cochrane)删除重复,筛选文章,记录逐步选择过程,并从纳入的文章中提取数据。我们将遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展)指南。我们将以表格、图表、叙述性总结和模糊认知映射的方式呈现研究结果。我们将通过与魁北克的利益相关者进行比较,将文献的发现置于背景中,并提供讨论,以探索确定因素的潜在解决方案。结果:2024年1月进行了初步的有限搜索。这项研究将于2025年进行。预计结果将于2025年底公布。结论:我们预计,范围评估的结果将对专业人士、研究人员、政策制定者和土著社区本身有用,这些社区对共同设计和实施循证残疾项目和服务感兴趣,这将防止项目与社会文化背景不匹配。我们将通过与参与社区的研讨会、与当地相关利益攸关方的直接接触,以及通过会议演讲和在科学期刊上发表文章的方式传播这次审查的结果。试验注册:OSF登记处OSF .io/9rzkx;https://osf.io/9rzkx.International注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/57590。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Abortion and Sexual and Reproductive Health in Chilean Medical and Midwifery Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. 3D Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Morphology Between Chronic Areca Nut Chewers and Nonchewers: Protocol for a Case-Control Study. Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Ketone Metabolism and Immunoregulation in Premenopausal Women: Protocol for a Pilot, Prospective, Single-Arm Dietary Intervention Study. Impact of the Population Medicine Multimorbidity Intervention in Xishui County (POPMIX) on People at High Risk for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Experience Mental Health Symptoms: Protocol for the POPMIX-MH Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Against Enterococcus faecalis in Root Canal Systems: Protocol for an In Vitro Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1