The State of the Art of eHealth Self-Management Interventions for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Scoping Review.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.2196/57649
Eline Te Braake, Roswita Vaseur, Christiane Grünloh, Monique Tabak
{"title":"The State of the Art of eHealth Self-Management Interventions for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Scoping Review.","authors":"Eline Te Braake, Roswita Vaseur, Christiane Grünloh, Monique Tabak","doi":"10.2196/57649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic incurable disease. Treatment of COPD often focuses on symptom management and progression prevention using pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies (eg, medication, inhaler use, and smoking cessation). Self-management is an important aspect of managing COPD. Self-management interventions are increasingly delivered through eHealth, which may help people with COPD engage in self-management. However, little is known about the actual content of these eHealth interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This literature review aimed to investigate the state-of-the-art eHealth self-management technologies for COPD. More specifically, we aimed to investigate the functionality, modality, technology readiness level, underlying theories of the technology, the positive health dimensions addressed, the target population characteristics (ie, the intended population, the included population, and the actual population), the self-management processes, and behavior change techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed to answer the proposed research questions. The databases PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), and Wiley were searched for relevant articles. We identified articles published between January 1, 2012, and June 1, 2022, that described eHealth self-management interventions for COPD. Identified articles were screened for eligibility using the web-based software Rayyan.ai. Eligible articles were identified, assessed, and categorized by the reviewers, either directly or through a combination of methods, using Atlas.ti version 9.1.7.0. Thereafter, data were charted accordingly and presented with the purpose of giving an overview of currently available literature while highlighting existing gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 eligible articles were included. This review found that most eHealth technologies (91/101, 90.1%) enable patients to self-monitor their symptoms using (smart) measuring devices (39/91, 43%), smartphones (27/91, 30%), or tablets (25/91, 27%). The self-management process of \"taking ownership of health needs\" (94/101, 93.1%), the behavior change technique of \"feedback and monitoring\" (88/101, 87%), and the positive health dimension of \"bodily functioning\" (101/101, 100%) were most often addressed. The inclusion criteria of studies and the actual populations reached show that a subset of people with COPD participate in eHealth studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current body of literature related to eHealth interventions has a strong tendency toward managing the physical aspect of COPD self-management. The necessity to specify inclusion criteria to control variables, combined with the practical challenges of recruiting diverse participants, leads to people with COPD being included in eHealth studies that only represent a subgroup of the whole population. Therefore, future research should be aware of this unintentional blind spot, make efforts to reach the underrepresented population, and address multiple dimensions of the positive health paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e57649"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic incurable disease. Treatment of COPD often focuses on symptom management and progression prevention using pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies (eg, medication, inhaler use, and smoking cessation). Self-management is an important aspect of managing COPD. Self-management interventions are increasingly delivered through eHealth, which may help people with COPD engage in self-management. However, little is known about the actual content of these eHealth interventions.

Objective: This literature review aimed to investigate the state-of-the-art eHealth self-management technologies for COPD. More specifically, we aimed to investigate the functionality, modality, technology readiness level, underlying theories of the technology, the positive health dimensions addressed, the target population characteristics (ie, the intended population, the included population, and the actual population), the self-management processes, and behavior change techniques.

Methods: A scoping review was performed to answer the proposed research questions. The databases PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO (via EBSCO), and Wiley were searched for relevant articles. We identified articles published between January 1, 2012, and June 1, 2022, that described eHealth self-management interventions for COPD. Identified articles were screened for eligibility using the web-based software Rayyan.ai. Eligible articles were identified, assessed, and categorized by the reviewers, either directly or through a combination of methods, using Atlas.ti version 9.1.7.0. Thereafter, data were charted accordingly and presented with the purpose of giving an overview of currently available literature while highlighting existing gaps.

Results: A total of 101 eligible articles were included. This review found that most eHealth technologies (91/101, 90.1%) enable patients to self-monitor their symptoms using (smart) measuring devices (39/91, 43%), smartphones (27/91, 30%), or tablets (25/91, 27%). The self-management process of "taking ownership of health needs" (94/101, 93.1%), the behavior change technique of "feedback and monitoring" (88/101, 87%), and the positive health dimension of "bodily functioning" (101/101, 100%) were most often addressed. The inclusion criteria of studies and the actual populations reached show that a subset of people with COPD participate in eHealth studies.

Conclusions: The current body of literature related to eHealth interventions has a strong tendency toward managing the physical aspect of COPD self-management. The necessity to specify inclusion criteria to control variables, combined with the practical challenges of recruiting diverse participants, leads to people with COPD being included in eHealth studies that only represent a subgroup of the whole population. Therefore, future research should be aware of this unintentional blind spot, make efforts to reach the underrepresented population, and address multiple dimensions of the positive health paradigm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者电子健康自我管理干预的现状:范围审查。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种常见的慢性不治之症。慢性阻塞性肺病的治疗通常侧重于使用药物和非药物治疗(例如,药物治疗、使用吸入器和戒烟)来控制症状和预防进展。自我管理是COPD管理的一个重要方面。自我管理干预措施越来越多地通过电子卫生保健提供,这可能有助于慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行自我管理。然而,人们对这些电子卫生干预措施的实际内容知之甚少。目的:本文献综述旨在探讨最先进的COPD电子健康自我管理技术。更具体地说,我们的目的是调查功能、模式、技术准备水平、技术的基本理论、解决的积极健康维度、目标人群特征(即预期人群、包括人群和实际人群)、自我管理过程和行为改变技术。方法:进行范围综述以回答提出的研究问题。检索PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO(通过EBSCO)和Wiley数据库查找相关文章。我们找到了发表于2012年1月1日至2022年6月1日之间的文章,这些文章描述了eHealth对COPD的自我管理干预。确定的文章使用基于网络的软件Rayyan.ai进行筛选。审稿人使用Atlas直接或通过多种方法对符合条件的文章进行识别、评估和分类。Ti版本9.1.7.0。此后,数据被绘制成相应的图表,并呈现出来,目的是概述当前可用的文献,同时突出现有的差距。结果:共纳入101篇符合条件的文献。本综述发现,大多数电子健康技术(91/ 101,90.1%)使患者能够使用(智能)测量设备(39/ 91,43%)、智能手机(27/ 91,30%)或平板电脑(25/ 91,27%)自我监测症状。最常提到的是“健康需求所有权”的自我管理过程(94/101,93.1%)、“反馈和监测”的行为改变技术(88/101,87%)和“身体功能”的积极健康维度(101/101,100%)。研究的纳入标准和实际达到的人群表明,一部分COPD患者参与了电子健康研究。结论:目前与电子健康干预相关的文献有很强的倾向于管理COPD自我管理的身体方面。必须明确纳入标准以控制变量,再加上招募不同参与者的实际挑战,导致COPD患者被纳入仅代表整个人群的一个亚组的电子健康研究。因此,未来的研究应该意识到这一无意的盲点,努力接触到代表性不足的人群,并解决积极健康范式的多个维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Scalable and Robust Artificial Intelligence for Spine Alignment Assessment: Multicenter Study Enabled by Real-Time Data Transformation. Using an Adult-Designed Wearable for Pediatric Monitoring: Practical Tutorial and Application in School-Aged Children With Obesity. Effectiveness of Al-Assisted Patient Health Education Using Voice Cloning and ChatGPT: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Telemedicine Adoption for Managing Chronic and Rare Diseases in Indonesia During and Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Qualitative Study. Guide on Selection of Optimal Motivational Themes for Use in a Clinical Trial Recruiting Black US Adults: Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1