Feasibility of craniofacial landmark plotting on magnetic resonance images.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Odontology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s10266-025-01077-6
Shailendra Singh Rana, Arti Sharma, Abhishek Gupta, Sharvari Vichare, Anjana Rajagopalan
{"title":"Feasibility of craniofacial landmark plotting on magnetic resonance images.","authors":"Shailendra Singh Rana, Arti Sharma, Abhishek Gupta, Sharvari Vichare, Anjana Rajagopalan","doi":"10.1007/s10266-025-01077-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several drawbacks of 2D radiography have been addressed by the use of 3D modalities such as CT/CBCT. However, these are associated with significantly increased radiation exposure. Hence, the role of MRI in routine orthodontic planning needs to be further investigated. The objective of the work is to evaluate feasibility of plotting cephalometric landmarks on MRI scans. 40 MRI images were collected randomly and retrospectively irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. For plotting purposes, 41 landmarks were found for every anonymized image separately. Two experienced orthodontists completed landmark plotting at two different time intervals. The mean error of landmark plotting, standard deviation, correlation coefficients and t-test were computed to assess the feasibility of landmark plotting on the three axes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9 indicated strong inter-observer reliability for each of the 41 landmarks on the x, y, and z axes. The paired t-test for each landmark revealed negligible differences in the orientation of the volume-rendered images. Out of all the landmarks, Porion and Orbitale had the most localization errors. MRI is a reliable tool for plotting cephalometric landmarks and thus for conducting cephalometric analyses. The landmarks' anatomical placements on the midline, bilateral, and curved structures affect how consistently they are identified. The radiation exposure to the patient for the acquisition of CT/CBCT images can be eliminated for performing 3D cephalometric analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01077-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several drawbacks of 2D radiography have been addressed by the use of 3D modalities such as CT/CBCT. However, these are associated with significantly increased radiation exposure. Hence, the role of MRI in routine orthodontic planning needs to be further investigated. The objective of the work is to evaluate feasibility of plotting cephalometric landmarks on MRI scans. 40 MRI images were collected randomly and retrospectively irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. For plotting purposes, 41 landmarks were found for every anonymized image separately. Two experienced orthodontists completed landmark plotting at two different time intervals. The mean error of landmark plotting, standard deviation, correlation coefficients and t-test were computed to assess the feasibility of landmark plotting on the three axes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9 indicated strong inter-observer reliability for each of the 41 landmarks on the x, y, and z axes. The paired t-test for each landmark revealed negligible differences in the orientation of the volume-rendered images. Out of all the landmarks, Porion and Orbitale had the most localization errors. MRI is a reliable tool for plotting cephalometric landmarks and thus for conducting cephalometric analyses. The landmarks' anatomical placements on the midline, bilateral, and curved structures affect how consistently they are identified. The radiation exposure to the patient for the acquisition of CT/CBCT images can be eliminated for performing 3D cephalometric analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅面标记在磁共振图像上绘制的可行性。
2D x线摄影的几个缺点已经通过使用3D模式(如CT/CBCT)得到解决。然而,这些都与显著增加的辐射暴露有关。因此,MRI在常规正畸计划中的作用有待进一步研究。这项工作的目的是评估在MRI扫描上绘制头颅测量标志的可行性。随机回顾性收集40张MRI图像,不考虑年龄、性别和种族。为了绘图的目的,为每个匿名图像分别找到41个地标。两位经验丰富的正畸医生在两个不同的时间间隔完成地标绘制。计算地标标绘的平均误差、标准差、相关系数和t检验,评价三轴标绘的可行性。相关系数为0.9,表明x、y和z轴上41个地标的观察者间信度都很强。每个地标的配对t检验显示,体渲染图像的方向差异可以忽略不计。在所有地标中,《Porion》和《Orbitale》的定位错误最多。MRI是绘制头颅测量标志的可靠工具,因此可以进行头颅测量分析。标志在中线、双侧和弯曲结构上的解剖位置影响其识别的一致性。可以消除为获取CT/CBCT图像而对患者进行的辐射暴露,从而进行3D头部测量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
期刊最新文献
Comparative numerical finite element analysis of tooth-implant- versus implant-implant-supported three-unit fixed prostheses under oblique loading. Evaluation of the analgesic effect of sublingual administration of wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum) extract for dental pain management in irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Effectiveness of experimental composites containing antimicrobial agents for orthodontic applications. Preventive effects of whitening mouthrinses against coffee-induced discoloration in different types of resin composites: a daily-use in-vitro study. Clinical performance of BioCoat™ and Fissurit FX: a randomized 18-month split-mouth study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1