Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health.

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.3791/67674
Afrina Adlyna Mohamad Matrol, Melanie Koh, Wei Ping Eddy Tan, Hang Cheng Ong, Letchumy Praba Ramanaidu, Shier Nee Saw
{"title":"Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health.","authors":"Afrina Adlyna Mohamad Matrol, Melanie Koh, Wei Ping Eddy Tan, Hang Cheng Ong, Letchumy Praba Ramanaidu, Shier Nee Saw","doi":"10.3791/67674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to validate the accuracy of low-cost fitness smartwatches by comparing their data with gold-standard measurements for cardiovascular and physical activity parameters. The study enrolled 50 subjects, 26 undergoing validation testing for heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), and sleep data against polysomnography (PSG). Additionally, 24 subjects participated in the 3-Minute Walk Test (3MWT) and Stairs Climbing (SC), with step counts validated against manual video calculations. Results showed no significant difference between the device's measurements and gold standard values for shallow sleep, deep sleep, REM time, mean heart rate, minimum heart rate, and SpO2. However, the device significantly underestimated manually counted steps (p = 0.009 (3MWT); p = 0.012 (SC)), total sleep duration (p = 0.004), and wake time (p = 8.94 × 10<sup>-8</sup>) while overestimating maximum heart rate (p = 0.011). These findings highlight the importance of accurate validation and interpretation of wearable device data in clinical contexts. Given these limitations, excluding the device's readings in future analyses is recommended to maintain data reliability and research integrity. This study underscores the need for ongoing validation and improvement of wearable technology to ensure its reliability and effectiveness in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48787,"journal":{"name":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","volume":" 216","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3791/67674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to validate the accuracy of low-cost fitness smartwatches by comparing their data with gold-standard measurements for cardiovascular and physical activity parameters. The study enrolled 50 subjects, 26 undergoing validation testing for heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), and sleep data against polysomnography (PSG). Additionally, 24 subjects participated in the 3-Minute Walk Test (3MWT) and Stairs Climbing (SC), with step counts validated against manual video calculations. Results showed no significant difference between the device's measurements and gold standard values for shallow sleep, deep sleep, REM time, mean heart rate, minimum heart rate, and SpO2. However, the device significantly underestimated manually counted steps (p = 0.009 (3MWT); p = 0.012 (SC)), total sleep duration (p = 0.004), and wake time (p = 8.94 × 10-8) while overestimating maximum heart rate (p = 0.011). These findings highlight the importance of accurate validation and interpretation of wearable device data in clinical contexts. Given these limitations, excluding the device's readings in future analyses is recommended to maintain data reliability and research integrity. This study underscores the need for ongoing validation and improvement of wearable technology to ensure its reliability and effectiveness in healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于心血管和身体活动监测的健身智能手表数据的准确性:数字健康的验证研究。
这项研究旨在通过将低成本健身智能手表的数据与心血管和身体活动参数的黄金标准测量值进行比较,验证其准确性。研究招募了 50 名受试者,其中 26 人接受了心率、血氧饱和度(SpO2)和多导睡眠图(PSG)睡眠数据的验证测试。此外,24 名受试者参加了 3 分钟步行测试 (3MWT) 和爬楼梯测试 (SC),并根据手动视频计算验证了步数。结果显示,在浅睡眠、深睡眠、快速动眼期时间、平均心率、最低心率和 SpO2 方面,设备的测量值与黄金标准值无明显差异。但是,该设备明显低估了人工计算的步数(p = 0.009(3MWT);p = 0.012(SC))、总睡眠时间(p = 0.004)和唤醒时间(p = 8.94 × 10-8),同时高估了最大心率(p = 0.011)。这些发现凸显了在临床环境中准确验证和解释可穿戴设备数据的重要性。鉴于这些局限性,建议在未来的分析中排除设备的读数,以保持数据的可靠性和研究的完整性。这项研究强调了持续验证和改进可穿戴技术的必要性,以确保其在医疗保健领域的可靠性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
992
期刊介绍: JoVE, the Journal of Visualized Experiments, is the world''s first peer reviewed scientific video journal. Established in 2006, JoVE is devoted to publishing scientific research in a visual format to help researchers overcome two of the biggest challenges facing the scientific research community today; poor reproducibility and the time and labor intensive nature of learning new experimental techniques.
期刊最新文献
A Data-Driven Framework for Financial Risk Prediction and Control in the Digital Economy. A Rat Model of Tibial Cortex Transverse Transport for the Treatment of Lower Limb Ischemia. A Lip Fixation Device Facilitates Labial Salivary Gland Biopsy for Sjögren's Disease. A Mouse Model of Streptococcus pyogenes Necrotizing Skin Infection. A Quantitative Measurement of Ocular Rotation in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Double Marking of Corneal Limbus and Sclera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1