An Exploration of the Content and Language Used in Publicly Available National Health Service Patient Information Leaflets for People Considering Shoulder Replacement Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.70079
Maria Moffatt, Nina Chalmers, Chris Littlewood
{"title":"An Exploration of the Content and Language Used in Publicly Available National Health Service Patient Information Leaflets for People Considering Shoulder Replacement Surgery: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Maria Moffatt, Nina Chalmers, Chris Littlewood","doi":"10.1002/msc.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The decision to undergo total shoulder replacement surgery is a major one and should be a joint one between the patient and surgeon. It is important that patients are provided with accessible, meaningful and appropriate information to enable an informed decision. The aim of this study was to explore the content and language used within publicly available information leaflets produced by UK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts for people considering shoulder replacement surgery and to consider how this may influence surgical decision making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An online search of publicly available NHS shoulder replacement patient information leaflets (PIL) was undertaken. The text within the PIL was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight PIL were identified. The volume of information and content varied greatly. All PIL discussed the clinical problem, mainly within a biomedical framework and from a clinician's perspective in which normal shoulder anatomy was contrasted with shoulder pathology. Only a minority of the PIL discussed non-surgical treatments and of those that did, such approaches were predominantly portrayed as a temporary management option only, whilst surgery was frequently portrayed as the optimum treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is variation in the content of NHS shoulder replacement PIL. The content and language used may not adequately support people in making an informed decision about whether surgery is the right treatment option for them. We need to better understand the information needs of people considering shoulder replacement surgery, and provide information that is accessible, culturally sensitive, and capable of facilitating shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"e70079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The decision to undergo total shoulder replacement surgery is a major one and should be a joint one between the patient and surgeon. It is important that patients are provided with accessible, meaningful and appropriate information to enable an informed decision. The aim of this study was to explore the content and language used within publicly available information leaflets produced by UK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts for people considering shoulder replacement surgery and to consider how this may influence surgical decision making.

Design: An online search of publicly available NHS shoulder replacement patient information leaflets (PIL) was undertaken. The text within the PIL was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Thirty-eight PIL were identified. The volume of information and content varied greatly. All PIL discussed the clinical problem, mainly within a biomedical framework and from a clinician's perspective in which normal shoulder anatomy was contrasted with shoulder pathology. Only a minority of the PIL discussed non-surgical treatments and of those that did, such approaches were predominantly portrayed as a temporary management option only, whilst surgery was frequently portrayed as the optimum treatment.

Conclusion: There is variation in the content of NHS shoulder replacement PIL. The content and language used may not adequately support people in making an informed decision about whether surgery is the right treatment option for them. We need to better understand the information needs of people considering shoulder replacement surgery, and provide information that is accessible, culturally sensitive, and capable of facilitating shared decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项质性研究:对考虑进行肩关节置换手术的公众可获得的国家卫生服务患者信息单张的内容和语言的探索。
目的:接受全肩关节置换术是一个重大的决定,应该是患者和外科医生共同的决定。重要的是向患者提供可获得的、有意义的和适当的信息,以便做出明智的决定。本研究的目的是探讨英国国民健康服务(NHS)信托基金为考虑进行肩关节置换手术的人制作的公开信息传单的内容和语言,并考虑这可能如何影响手术决策。设计:进行了公开的NHS肩关节置换术患者信息传单(PIL)的在线搜索。使用反身性主题分析分析了PIL中的文本。结果:鉴定出38例PIL。信息量和内容变化很大。所有的PIL都讨论了临床问题,主要是在生物医学框架内,从临床医生的角度,将正常的肩部解剖与肩部病理进行对比。只有少数PIL讨论了非手术治疗,而这些方法主要被描述为临时管理选择,而手术经常被描述为最佳治疗。结论:NHS肩关节置换术中PIL含量存在差异。所使用的内容和语言可能不足以支持人们做出明智的决定,以确定手术是否是他们的正确治疗选择。我们需要更好地了解考虑进行肩关节置换术的患者的信息需求,并提供可获取的、具有文化敏感性的、能够促进共同决策的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Isolated Balance Exercise Regimen and Conventional Physiotherapy on Lumbar Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment in Male Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain. Combining Mechanical Support With Sensory Augmentation in Orthotic Devices for Postural Stability in Lateral Ankle Instability: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Environmentally Sustainable Approaches to Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review of Practices With Potential Carbon Efficiency. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Geniohyoid Muscle Morphometry and Elasticity in Older Adults: Associations With Sarcopenia Risk and Swallowing Dysfunction. Knowledge of Italian Physiotherapists on Cognitive Testing of Musculoskeletal Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1