Impact of Big Data Analytics on Emergency Department Efficiency in Saudi Ministry of Health Hospitals: A Retrospective Data Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S503744
Mohammed Senitan, Bandar Jarallah Alzahrani
{"title":"Impact of Big Data Analytics on Emergency Department Efficiency in Saudi Ministry of Health Hospitals: A Retrospective Data Analysis.","authors":"Mohammed Senitan, Bandar Jarallah Alzahrani","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S503744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of big data analytics in healthcare has become essential for enhancing operational performance, particularly within Emergency Departments (EDs), where efficiency improvements can significantly impact patient satisfaction and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examines the impact of big data analytics on ED performance metrics within Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals, with a focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) and the effectiveness of the Ada'a Health Program in optimizing ED operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted across 10 hospitals in five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data from 228,857 patient records were analyzed, alongside survey responses from 223 ED personnel. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression models, were used to evaluate improvements in KPIs and assess the program's impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements in all KPIs were observed following the implementation of the Adaa Health Program. Door-to-Doctor Time decreased from 28:26 to 25:13, Doctor-to-Decision Time from 1:18:22 to 1:03:50, Decision-to-Disposition Time from 36:37 to 20:13, and Door-to-Disposition Time from 2:22:02 to 1:48:44. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between Decision-to-Disposition Time and Doctor-to-Decision Time (r = 0.594), emphasizing the role of clinical decision-making in patient flow. Regression analysis further confirmed the program's significant association with reduced wait times (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the transformative impact of big data-driven decision-making in optimizing ED efficiency. The Ada'a Health Program has significantly improved patient flow, reduced congestion, and enhanced operational performance in Saudi MOH hospitals. These findings underscore the need for continued investment in big data analytics, updated predictive modeling, and workflow automation to sustain and further enhance ED efficiency. Future research should explore scalability across diverse healthcare settings and the long-term sustainability of such interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"775-784"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S503744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of big data analytics in healthcare has become essential for enhancing operational performance, particularly within Emergency Departments (EDs), where efficiency improvements can significantly impact patient satisfaction and resource utilization.

Aim: This study examines the impact of big data analytics on ED performance metrics within Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals, with a focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) and the effectiveness of the Ada'a Health Program in optimizing ED operations.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted across 10 hospitals in five regions of Saudi Arabia. Data from 228,857 patient records were analyzed, alongside survey responses from 223 ED personnel. Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression models, were used to evaluate improvements in KPIs and assess the program's impact.

Results: Significant improvements in all KPIs were observed following the implementation of the Adaa Health Program. Door-to-Doctor Time decreased from 28:26 to 25:13, Doctor-to-Decision Time from 1:18:22 to 1:03:50, Decision-to-Disposition Time from 36:37 to 20:13, and Door-to-Disposition Time from 2:22:02 to 1:48:44. Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong relationship between Decision-to-Disposition Time and Doctor-to-Decision Time (r = 0.594), emphasizing the role of clinical decision-making in patient flow. Regression analysis further confirmed the program's significant association with reduced wait times (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study highlights the transformative impact of big data-driven decision-making in optimizing ED efficiency. The Ada'a Health Program has significantly improved patient flow, reduced congestion, and enhanced operational performance in Saudi MOH hospitals. These findings underscore the need for continued investment in big data analytics, updated predictive modeling, and workflow automation to sustain and further enhance ED efficiency. Future research should explore scalability across diverse healthcare settings and the long-term sustainability of such interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大数据分析对沙特卫生部医院急诊科效率的影响:回顾性数据分析
背景:在医疗保健领域整合大数据分析对于提高运营绩效至关重要,特别是在急诊科(ed),效率的提高可以显著影响患者满意度和资源利用率。目的:本研究探讨了大数据分析对沙特阿拉伯卫生部(MOH)医院ED绩效指标的影响,重点关注关键绩效指标(kpi)和Ada'a Health Program在优化ED运营方面的有效性。方法:回顾性观察研究在沙特阿拉伯五个地区的10家医院进行。分析了228,857例患者记录的数据,以及223名急诊科人员的调查回复。统计分析,包括配对t检验、Pearson相关和多元回归模型,用于评估kpi的改进和评估项目的影响。结果:在实施Adaa健康计划后,观察到所有kpi都有显着改善。从门到医生的时间从28:26减少到25:13,从医生到决策的时间从1:18:22减少到1:03:50,从决策到处置的时间从36:37减少到20:13,从门到处置的时间从2:22:02减少到1:48:44。Pearson相关分析显示,决策到处置时间与医生到决策时间之间存在较强的相关性(r = 0.594),强调了临床决策在患者流程中的作用。回归分析进一步证实了该计划与减少等待时间的显著关联(p < 0.001)。结论:本研究强调了大数据驱动决策在优化ED效率方面的变革性影响。Ada'a卫生方案显著改善了沙特卫生部医院的病人流量,减少了拥堵,并提高了运营绩效。这些发现强调了在大数据分析、更新预测建模和工作流程自动化方面持续投资的必要性,以维持并进一步提高ED的效率。未来的研究应该探索不同医疗环境的可扩展性和这种干预措施的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Side Effect: Immuno-Ethical Risk Analysis of Animal-Derived Ingredients in Pharmaceuticals. Performance of Novel Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Specific Models for Risk Adjustment. An ISO 31000-Based Risk Matrix for Risk Management in Anticancer Drug Prescription, Compounding, and Administration for Lung Cancer Patients Treated in a Day Hospital Setting. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Dispensing Errors for Patient Safety and Quality: A Systems Approach. Informing Hospital Formulary Decisions in China: A Multi-Criteria Value Framework for GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1