Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Patients With Cognitive-Communication Disorders: A Survey Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00285
Faith Stagge, Matthew L Cohen, Allyson Lindsay Johnson, Alyssa M Lanzi
{"title":"Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Patients With Cognitive-Communication Disorders: A Survey Study.","authors":"Faith Stagge, Matthew L Cohen, Allyson Lindsay Johnson, Alyssa M Lanzi","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) primarily assess patients with cognitive-communication disorders using performance-based measures. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may also prove useful in clinical practice with these populations, as they can capture applied communication constructs with subjective or unobservable elements (e.g., cognitive fatigue). We conducted a survey to gain insight into SLPs' clinical use of PROMs with these populations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ninety-five SLPs responded to 26 survey items that explored SLPs' (a) current use of PROMs in clinical care for adults with cognitive-communication disorders, (b) needs and barriers related to PROM use in clinical practice, and (c) gaps and needs with respect to the measurement of patient health-related quality of life. A convergent mixed-methods design was used to analyze qualitative and quantitative survey responses. Free-response questions were coded using a conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty percent of respondents reported using PROMs with their patients with cognitive-communication disorders, most often for goal setting, followed by assessing treatment effects. SLPs also reported barriers to PROM use with patients with cognitive-communication disorders, such as patient insight deficits and limited time. The identified barriers of <i>poor implementation</i> and <i>dissemination</i> have implications for future research directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey findings suggest that many SLPs do not currently use PROMs with patients who have cognitive-communication disorders, but those who do find them useful for goal setting. Survey findings also indicate several barriers that limit broader adoption of PROMs for this clinical population, which should be addressed through future implementation research and clinical initiatives such as creating PROM education for SLPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":"34 2","pages":"798-817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11902987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) primarily assess patients with cognitive-communication disorders using performance-based measures. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may also prove useful in clinical practice with these populations, as they can capture applied communication constructs with subjective or unobservable elements (e.g., cognitive fatigue). We conducted a survey to gain insight into SLPs' clinical use of PROMs with these populations.

Method: Ninety-five SLPs responded to 26 survey items that explored SLPs' (a) current use of PROMs in clinical care for adults with cognitive-communication disorders, (b) needs and barriers related to PROM use in clinical practice, and (c) gaps and needs with respect to the measurement of patient health-related quality of life. A convergent mixed-methods design was used to analyze qualitative and quantitative survey responses. Free-response questions were coded using a conventional content analysis.

Results: Forty percent of respondents reported using PROMs with their patients with cognitive-communication disorders, most often for goal setting, followed by assessing treatment effects. SLPs also reported barriers to PROM use with patients with cognitive-communication disorders, such as patient insight deficits and limited time. The identified barriers of poor implementation and dissemination have implications for future research directions.

Conclusions: The survey findings suggest that many SLPs do not currently use PROMs with patients who have cognitive-communication disorders, but those who do find them useful for goal setting. Survey findings also indicate several barriers that limit broader adoption of PROMs for this clinical population, which should be addressed through future implementation research and clinical initiatives such as creating PROM education for SLPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言病理学家对成年认知沟通障碍患者使用患者报告的结果测量:一项调查研究。
目的:语言病理学家(slp)主要使用基于表现的测量来评估认知沟通障碍患者。患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)在这些人群的临床实践中也可能被证明是有用的,因为它们可以捕捉到带有主观或不可观察因素(例如认知疲劳)的应用沟通结构。我们进行了一项调查,以深入了解slp在这些人群中使用PROMs的临床情况。方法:95个slp回应了26个调查项目,这些调查项目探讨了slp (a)目前在患有认知沟通障碍的成人临床护理中使用PROM的情况,(b)临床实践中使用PROM的需求和障碍,以及(c)与患者健康相关的生活质量测量方面的差距和需求。采用融合混合方法设计对定性和定量调查结果进行分析。使用传统的内容分析对自由回答问题进行编码。结果:40%的受访者表示,他们对患有认知沟通障碍的患者使用PROMs,最常见的是为了设定目标,然后评估治疗效果。slp还报告了认知沟通障碍患者使用PROM的障碍,例如患者洞察力不足和时间有限。已确定的实施和传播不良的障碍对未来的研究方向有影响。结论:调查结果表明,许多slp目前并未对有认知沟通障碍的患者使用PROMs,但那些有认知沟通障碍的患者发现PROMs对目标设定很有用。调查结果还表明,有几个障碍限制了临床人群更广泛地采用PROM,这些障碍应该通过未来的实施研究和临床举措来解决,例如为slp创建PROM教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
期刊最新文献
Caregiver-Implemented Hanen Programs®: A Narrative Review. Language Sample Analysis in Bilingual Children: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy. A Comparison of Four Selected Acoustic Measures in Detecting Voice Quality Changes With Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Adductor-Type Laryngeal Dystonia. Outcomes of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Implementation in Acute Care. Speech-Language Pathologists' Responsivity During School-Based Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1