Reevaluating Locus of Control Among Older Karen Refugees in Long-Term Resettlement: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf104
Katherine Kitchens, Noelle Fields, Diane B Mitschke
{"title":"Reevaluating Locus of Control Among Older Karen Refugees in Long-Term Resettlement: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.","authors":"Katherine Kitchens, Noelle Fields, Diane B Mitschke","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recent literature has applied locus of control (LOC), a psychological measure for understanding individuals' perceived control, to forcibly displaced populations. An internal LOC is generally considered beneficial for well-being in the Western context. However, the cross-cultural validity of this construct warrants further examination. This study aimed to capture the lived experiences of older Karen refugees in resettlement. Through this open-ended exploration, a narrative of subjective control emerged that diverged from Western assumptions. Notably, findings revealed that a sense of external LOC, viewed positively, was the cultural norm for this group, challenging the universality of Western LOC constructs and their presumed relationship to well-being.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of forced displacement and long-term resettlement among 10 older Karen refugees (age 55 and older) from Burma, utilizing in-depth interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlighted 4 emergent themes that underscore a divergence from the individualistic assumptions underlying the LOC construct, emphasizing an external LOC, collective orientation, familial interdependence, and community support networks.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings underscore a divergence from the individualistic assumptions underlying the LOC construct, emphasizing how older Karen refugees collectively navigate aging and displacement by relying on familial and communal support. This study reveals that traditional applications of the LOC construct may not fully capture the complex realities of refugees from collective cultures, suggesting the need for culturally sensitive research methodologies and culturally adapted psychometric measures and intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recent literature has applied locus of control (LOC), a psychological measure for understanding individuals' perceived control, to forcibly displaced populations. An internal LOC is generally considered beneficial for well-being in the Western context. However, the cross-cultural validity of this construct warrants further examination. This study aimed to capture the lived experiences of older Karen refugees in resettlement. Through this open-ended exploration, a narrative of subjective control emerged that diverged from Western assumptions. Notably, findings revealed that a sense of external LOC, viewed positively, was the cultural norm for this group, challenging the universality of Western LOC constructs and their presumed relationship to well-being.

Research design and methods: This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of forced displacement and long-term resettlement among 10 older Karen refugees (age 55 and older) from Burma, utilizing in-depth interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Results: Findings highlighted 4 emergent themes that underscore a divergence from the individualistic assumptions underlying the LOC construct, emphasizing an external LOC, collective orientation, familial interdependence, and community support networks.

Discussion and implications: Findings underscore a divergence from the individualistic assumptions underlying the LOC construct, emphasizing how older Karen refugees collectively navigate aging and displacement by relying on familial and communal support. This study reveals that traditional applications of the LOC construct may not fully capture the complex realities of refugees from collective cultures, suggesting the need for culturally sensitive research methodologies and culturally adapted psychometric measures and intervention strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对长期安置的克伦族老年难民控制点的再评估:一个解释性现象学分析。
背景和目的:最近的文献将控制点(LOC)——一种理解个体感知控制的心理测量——应用于被迫流离失所的人群。在西方背景下,内部LOC通常被认为对幸福有益。然而,这种结构的跨文化有效性有待进一步研究。这项研究的目的是捕捉老年克伦难民在重新安置中的生活经历。通过这种开放式的探索,一种不同于西方假设的主观控制叙事出现了。值得注意的是,研究结果显示,积极的外部LOC感是这一群体的文化规范,挑战了西方LOC结构的普遍性及其与幸福感的假定关系。研究设计和方法:本定性研究利用深度访谈和解释性现象学分析,探讨了来自缅甸的10名年龄较大的克伦难民(55岁及以上)被迫流离失所和长期重新安置的生活经历。结果:研究结果强调了四个新兴主题,这些主题强调了LOC结构背后的个人主义假设的分歧,强调了外部LOC、集体取向、家庭相互依存和社区支持网络。讨论和启示:研究结果强调了基于LOC结构的个人主义假设的分歧,强调了老年克伦难民如何通过依赖家庭和社区支持来集体应对老龄化和流离失所。本研究表明,传统的LOC结构的应用可能不能完全捕捉到集体文化难民的复杂现实,这表明需要文化敏感的研究方法和文化适应的心理测量方法和干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Improving Care for Older Adults with Multiple Needs: The Value of Complexity Science. Sociodemographic Disparities in the Health Status of Informal Caregivers. Discrimination, positive reappraisal, and hypertension among older Black adults. Role of peer-tutors with dementia in Recovery College dementia courses: an ethnographic account. Exploring the cognitive aspects of walking in the neighborhoods among people living with dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1