Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.

IF 2.4 International journal of radiation biology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1080/09553002.2025.2470947
Yumi Saigusa, Mark P Little, Omid Azimzadeh, Nobuyuki Hamada
{"title":"Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.","authors":"Yumi Saigusa, Mark P Little, Omid Azimzadeh, Nobuyuki Hamada","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2025.2470947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is generally thought to be more biologically effective in various tissues than low-LET radiation, but whether this also applies to the circulatory system remains unclear. We therefore reviewed biological studies about the effects of high-LET radiation on the circulatory system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified 76 relevant papers (24 in vitro, 2 ex vivo, 51 in vivo, one overlapping). In vitro studies used human, bovine, porcine or chick vascular endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes, while ex vivo studies used porcine hearts. In vivo studies used mice, rats, rabbits, dogs or pigs. The types of high-LET radiation used were neutrons, α particles, heavy ions and negative pions. Most studies used a single dose, although some investigated fractionation effects. Twenty-one studies estimated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) that ranged from 0.1 to 130, depending on radiation quality and endpoint. A meta-analysis of 6 in vitro and 8 in vivo studies (selected based on the feasibility of estimating the RBE and its uncertainty) suggested an RBE of 6.69 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.51, 10.88) for in vitro studies and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.37) for in vivo studies. The meta-analysis of these 14 studies yielded an RBE of 2.88 (95% CI: 1.52, 4.25). This suggests that high-LET radiation is only slightly more effective than low-LET radiation, although substantial inter-study heterogeneity complicates interpretation. Therapeutic effects have also been reported in disease models. Further research is needed to better understand the effects on the cardiovascular system and to improve radiation protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"429-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2470947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: High-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is generally thought to be more biologically effective in various tissues than low-LET radiation, but whether this also applies to the circulatory system remains unclear. We therefore reviewed biological studies about the effects of high-LET radiation on the circulatory system.

Conclusions: We identified 76 relevant papers (24 in vitro, 2 ex vivo, 51 in vivo, one overlapping). In vitro studies used human, bovine, porcine or chick vascular endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes, while ex vivo studies used porcine hearts. In vivo studies used mice, rats, rabbits, dogs or pigs. The types of high-LET radiation used were neutrons, α particles, heavy ions and negative pions. Most studies used a single dose, although some investigated fractionation effects. Twenty-one studies estimated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) that ranged from 0.1 to 130, depending on radiation quality and endpoint. A meta-analysis of 6 in vitro and 8 in vivo studies (selected based on the feasibility of estimating the RBE and its uncertainty) suggested an RBE of 6.69 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.51, 10.88) for in vitro studies and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.37) for in vivo studies. The meta-analysis of these 14 studies yielded an RBE of 2.88 (95% CI: 1.52, 4.25). This suggests that high-LET radiation is only slightly more effective than low-LET radiation, although substantial inter-study heterogeneity complicates interpretation. Therapeutic effects have also been reported in disease models. Further research is needed to better understand the effects on the cardiovascular system and to improve radiation protection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高let辐射对循环系统的生物学效应。
目的:高线性能量传递(High-linear energy transfer, LET)辐射通常被认为在各种组织中比低线性能量传递(low- linear energy transfer, LET)辐射更有效,但这是否也适用于循环系统尚不清楚。因此,我们回顾了高let辐射对循环系统影响的生物学研究。结论:共检索到相关论文76篇(体外24篇,离体2篇,体内51篇,重叠1篇)。体外研究使用人、牛、猪或鸡血管内皮细胞或心肌细胞,而体外研究使用猪心脏。体内研究使用小鼠、大鼠、兔子、狗或猪。使用的高let辐射类型有中子、α粒子、重离子和负离子。大多数研究使用单一剂量,尽管有些研究分离效应。21项研究估计相对生物有效性(RBE)范围从0.1到130,取决于辐射质量和终点。对6项体外研究和8项体内研究(根据估计RBE的可行性及其不确定性选择)的荟萃分析表明,体外研究的RBE为6.69(95%置信区间(CI): 2.51, 10.88),体内研究的RBE为1.14 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.37)。对这14项研究的荟萃分析得出RBE为2.88 (95% CI: 1.52, 4.25)。这表明高let辐射仅比低let辐射略微有效,尽管大量的研究间异质性使解释复杂化。在疾病模型中也报道了治疗效果。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解对心血管系统的影响并改善辐射防护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A unified framework integrating local effect and DNA damage for the derivation of cell survival model parameters. Can Saccharomyces boulardii protect against radioactive iodine induced gastrointestinal damage? Study in a rat model. Oxidative stress and histopathological alterations in rats (Rattus norvegicus) after oral I-131 administration. Regulation of LTP of synaptic plasticity in rat Schaffer-CA1 by broadband mixed-frequency micromagnetic stimulation. Bacillus subtilis spores inactivated by short pulses of soft X-rays in the water window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1