Being an Insider Nurse Researcher: Navigating the Challenges and Benefits to Ensure Rigour

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1111/jan.16886
Linda Ora, Lesley Wilkes, Judy Mannix, Maricris Algoso, Lauretta Luck
{"title":"Being an Insider Nurse Researcher: Navigating the Challenges and Benefits to Ensure Rigour","authors":"Linda Ora,&nbsp;Lesley Wilkes,&nbsp;Judy Mannix,&nbsp;Maricris Algoso,&nbsp;Lauretta Luck","doi":"10.1111/jan.16886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To provide insights into the challenges and benefits of being an insider nurse researcher in case study research. To describe strategies used to maintain rigour and trustworthiness when conducting insider research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Case study with insider research methodology was used to evaluate a nurse-led supportive care model for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and their caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This paper reports a reflection on using insider research within a clinical context, utilising reflexive techniques such as journaling and discussions with academic supervisors to mitigate subjectivity. Informed consent and confidentiality were maintained to ensure ethical integrity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that insider research offers both challenges and benefits. The established therapeutic relationship with patients and caregivers provided a deep understanding but also posed risks of assumptions, role conflict, and bias toward positive responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Insider research was effective in evaluating a nurse-led model of care, providing unique insights from patients and caregivers. This discussion demonstrates the importance of reflexive practices and maintaining ethical rigour to balance roles and manage potential biases. The paper highlights both the challenges and benefits of insider research that may be helpful for other researchers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the value of insider research in a nursing context, demonstrating how nurses can leverage therapeutic relationships to enhance patient and caregiver voices to inform evidence-based practice. It also provides practical guidance for researchers on reflexive practices to manage the potential for bias and role conflicts, and the maintenance of ethical standards to ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of the research process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>The study addressed the challenges and benefits of being an insider nurse researcher in the context of evaluating a nurse-led supportive care model for patients with COPD and their caregivers. While insider research can provide unique insights, it also poses risks of assumptions, role conflict, and bias. This paper describes how these can be mitigated through reflexive techniques and integration of outsider perspectives. Established nurse–patient therapeutic relationships facilitated deeper understanding in a research setting; however, they require careful management to avoid bias. Ethical integrity was maintained through informed consent, confidentiality, and reflexive journaling. The research will impact patients and caregivers by improving their access to timely and comprehensive supportive and palliative care and offers valuable strategies for other nurse researchers to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of insider research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The development of the model of care in this study is informed by ongoing evaluation from patients with COPD and their caregivers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"82 1","pages":"934-940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.16886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To provide insights into the challenges and benefits of being an insider nurse researcher in case study research. To describe strategies used to maintain rigour and trustworthiness when conducting insider research.

Design

Case study with insider research methodology was used to evaluate a nurse-led supportive care model for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and their caregivers.

Methods

This paper reports a reflection on using insider research within a clinical context, utilising reflexive techniques such as journaling and discussions with academic supervisors to mitigate subjectivity. Informed consent and confidentiality were maintained to ensure ethical integrity.

Results

The study found that insider research offers both challenges and benefits. The established therapeutic relationship with patients and caregivers provided a deep understanding but also posed risks of assumptions, role conflict, and bias toward positive responses.

Conclusion

Insider research was effective in evaluating a nurse-led model of care, providing unique insights from patients and caregivers. This discussion demonstrates the importance of reflexive practices and maintaining ethical rigour to balance roles and manage potential biases. The paper highlights both the challenges and benefits of insider research that may be helpful for other researchers.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

This study highlights the value of insider research in a nursing context, demonstrating how nurses can leverage therapeutic relationships to enhance patient and caregiver voices to inform evidence-based practice. It also provides practical guidance for researchers on reflexive practices to manage the potential for bias and role conflicts, and the maintenance of ethical standards to ensure the integrity and trustworthiness of the research process.

Impact

The study addressed the challenges and benefits of being an insider nurse researcher in the context of evaluating a nurse-led supportive care model for patients with COPD and their caregivers. While insider research can provide unique insights, it also poses risks of assumptions, role conflict, and bias. This paper describes how these can be mitigated through reflexive techniques and integration of outsider perspectives. Established nurse–patient therapeutic relationships facilitated deeper understanding in a research setting; however, they require careful management to avoid bias. Ethical integrity was maintained through informed consent, confidentiality, and reflexive journaling. The research will impact patients and caregivers by improving their access to timely and comprehensive supportive and palliative care and offers valuable strategies for other nurse researchers to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of insider research.

Patient or Public Contribution

The development of the model of care in this study is informed by ongoing evaluation from patients with COPD and their caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为一个内部护士研究员:导航的挑战和利益,以确保严谨性
在案例研究中提供作为一名内部护士研究员的挑战和好处的见解。描述在进行内部研究时用于保持严谨性和可信度的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
The effects of clinical learning environment and career adaptability on resilience: A mediating analysis based on a survey of nursing interns. Correlation of psychological resilience with social support and coping style in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study. The Mediating Role of Spirituality in Delineating the Interconnection Between Self-Efficacy and Resilience Among the Parents of Children With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes: A Community Nursing-Led Cross-Sectional Study. Men in Nursing: Let's Talk. Exploring Nursing Implications in the Standards of Care for Transgender and Gender Diverse Health, Version 8 by Coleman et al. (2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1