Biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela con verde de indocianina en pacientes con cáncer de mama (estudio INSEAN)

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Cirugia Espanola Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.11.012
Sandra López Gordo , Iva Borisova , Neus Ruiz-Edo , David López-Cano , Marta de la Iglesia , Maite Salcedo-Pujantell , Mario Giner Pichel , Cristina Serra-Serra , Breast Cancer Research Group
{"title":"Biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela con verde de indocianina en pacientes con cáncer de mama (estudio INSEAN)","authors":"Sandra López Gordo ,&nbsp;Iva Borisova ,&nbsp;Neus Ruiz-Edo ,&nbsp;David López-Cano ,&nbsp;Marta de la Iglesia ,&nbsp;Maite Salcedo-Pujantell ,&nbsp;Mario Giner Pichel ,&nbsp;Cristina Serra-Serra ,&nbsp;Breast Cancer Research Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labeling with the radioisotope technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances.</div><div>Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective.</div></div><div><h3>Main hypothesis</h3><div>SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99.</div></div><div><h3>Secondary hypotheses</h3><div>(1) The combination of ICG and Tc-99 does not increase the average number of SLNs identified in primary surgery but does in the post-neoadjuvant setting. (2) Using ICG does not prolong surgical time once the learning curve is achieved. (3) The cost of ICG is lower than Tc-99.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and design</h3><div>This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).</div></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><div>Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant.</div><div>The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as «Tc», «Tc<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->ICG», or «ICG». Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"103 3","pages":"Pages 173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X25000077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labeling with the radioisotope technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances.
Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective.

Main hypothesis

SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99.

Secondary hypotheses

(1) The combination of ICG and Tc-99 does not increase the average number of SLNs identified in primary surgery but does in the post-neoadjuvant setting. (2) Using ICG does not prolong surgical time once the learning curve is achieved. (3) The cost of ICG is lower than Tc-99.

Methods and design

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).

Inclusion criteria

Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant.
The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as «Tc», «Tc + ICG», or «ICG». Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.

Discussion

The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela con verde de indocianina en pacientes con cáncer de mama (estudio INSEAN) «Cirugía Española»: nueva época al inicio de una nueva era Paratiroidectomía radioguiada: ¿qué aporta a la cirugía? Estudio observacional, prospectivo, realizado en un solo centro Resultados al año de la técnica TROPIS en el tratamiento de la fístula anal compleja Tratamiento actual de la obesidad: una historia sobre creencias, apegos y confrontación
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1