Fatigue failure analysis of platform screen doors under subway aerodynamic loads using finite element modeling

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109502
Chengxing Yang , Yujia Huo , Kangpei Meng , Wei Zhou , Jun Yang , Zhao Nan
{"title":"Fatigue failure analysis of platform screen doors under subway aerodynamic loads using finite element modeling","authors":"Chengxing Yang ,&nbsp;Yujia Huo ,&nbsp;Kangpei Meng ,&nbsp;Wei Zhou ,&nbsp;Jun Yang ,&nbsp;Zhao Nan","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an investigation into the fatigue failure mechanisms of platform screen doors (PSDs) subjected to aerodynamic loads generated by high-speed subway trains. A comprehensive finite element model is developed, integrating with fast Fourier transform (FFT) techniques to isolate and evaluate pulsating wind frequencies that impact the structural behavior of PSDs. The extracted wind frequencies and transient vibration responses are analyzed to determine their effects on structural stability. A load-stress transmission model is introduced to convert aerodynamic load data into structural stress time histories, enabling detailed fatigue assessments. Additionally, a stress distribution model is constructed to capture variations in maximum stress under different train speeds and distances from the track centerline. The Brittle Cracking model is applied to assess potential damage to glass components, revealing that the wind load frequency remains significantly lower than the structure’s natural frequency, thereby preventing resonance-induced failure. To evaluate long-term performance, fatigue damage assessments of critical components (such as the bottom support, door frame, and bottom plate) are conducted using both Miner’s cumulative damage criterion and a nonlinear damage model based on fatigue driving force energy. The analysis demonstrates that the maximum equivalent damage values for these components are within safe limits over a 30-year design life, with values of 0.59, 0.06, and 0.27 for the linear model, and 0.65, 0.07, and 0.29 for the nonlinear model. The study concludes by proposing an optimized design for the bottom support structure, reducing structural damage by about 45%. This research provides innovative insights into improving the durability, safety, and performance of PSDs under dynamic aerodynamic loading, contributing both to theoretical advancements and practical applications in urban transit infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 109502"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725002432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents an investigation into the fatigue failure mechanisms of platform screen doors (PSDs) subjected to aerodynamic loads generated by high-speed subway trains. A comprehensive finite element model is developed, integrating with fast Fourier transform (FFT) techniques to isolate and evaluate pulsating wind frequencies that impact the structural behavior of PSDs. The extracted wind frequencies and transient vibration responses are analyzed to determine their effects on structural stability. A load-stress transmission model is introduced to convert aerodynamic load data into structural stress time histories, enabling detailed fatigue assessments. Additionally, a stress distribution model is constructed to capture variations in maximum stress under different train speeds and distances from the track centerline. The Brittle Cracking model is applied to assess potential damage to glass components, revealing that the wind load frequency remains significantly lower than the structure’s natural frequency, thereby preventing resonance-induced failure. To evaluate long-term performance, fatigue damage assessments of critical components (such as the bottom support, door frame, and bottom plate) are conducted using both Miner’s cumulative damage criterion and a nonlinear damage model based on fatigue driving force energy. The analysis demonstrates that the maximum equivalent damage values for these components are within safe limits over a 30-year design life, with values of 0.59, 0.06, and 0.27 for the linear model, and 0.65, 0.07, and 0.29 for the nonlinear model. The study concludes by proposing an optimized design for the bottom support structure, reducing structural damage by about 45%. This research provides innovative insights into improving the durability, safety, and performance of PSDs under dynamic aerodynamic loading, contributing both to theoretical advancements and practical applications in urban transit infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地铁气动载荷作用下站台屏蔽门疲劳失效有限元分析
本文研究了高速地铁列车产生的空气动力载荷作用下站台屏蔽门的疲劳破坏机理。建立了一个综合的有限元模型,结合快速傅里叶变换(FFT)技术来隔离和评估影响psd结构行为的脉动风频率。分析了提取的风频率和瞬态振动响应,确定了它们对结构稳定性的影响。引入载荷-应力传递模型,将气动载荷数据转换为结构应力时程,实现详细的疲劳评估。此外,还建立了应力分布模型,以捕捉不同列车速度和距轨道中心线距离下的最大应力变化。脆性开裂模型用于评估玻璃构件的潜在损伤,结果表明风荷载频率明显低于结构的固有频率,从而防止了共振引起的破坏。为了评估长期性能,使用Miner的累积损伤准则和基于疲劳驱动力能量的非线性损伤模型对关键部件(如底部支架、门框和底板)进行疲劳损伤评估。分析表明,在30年的设计寿命内,这些部件的最大等效损伤值在安全范围内,线性模型的值为0.59、0.06和0.27,非线性模型的值为0.65、0.07和0.29。研究最后提出了底部支撑结构的优化设计,减少了约45%的结构损坏。该研究为提高psd在动态空气动力载荷下的耐久性、安全性和性能提供了创新见解,有助于理论进步和城市交通基础设施的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Retraction notice to “Finite element evaluation of seismic response to RC interventions in historical masonry: Erzurum stone Granaries” [Eng. Fail. Anal. 178 (2025) 109727] Rotating bending fatigue analysis of 3D-printed PLA polymer composites: Effect of short fiber reinforcement and epoxy coating Wheel profile optimization for high-speed locomotives to suppress carbody hunting stability failure under complex wheel-rail conditions Guided wave characteristics and nondestructive testing of corrosion defects in threaded steel resin bolts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1