Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1177/02841851241297201
Jing Li, Wei-Min Kong
{"title":"Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jing Li, Wei-Min Kong","doi":"10.1177/02841851241297201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOvarian cancer has been reported to be the eighth most common cancer among women worldwide.PurposeTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Material and MethodsA comprehensive search of scientific literature databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI, was conducted from their inception to November 2019 to identify relevant studies on the use of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were retrieved and analyzed using Stata 15.0.ResultsAfter rigorous screening, a total of 15 high-quality clinical studies encompassing 934 patients with ovarian cancer, comprising 969 ovarian tumors (403 malignant tumors and 566 benign tumors), were included in the analysis. Data analysis revealed significant correlations between CEUS and various diagnostic indices for ovarian tumors: the combined SEN and SPE were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90-0.96), respectively, and the combined LR+ and LR- were 14.07 (95% CI = 9.46-20.92) and 0.08 (95% CI = 0.05-0.13), respectively, with a combined DOR of 185.15 (95% CI = 93.31-367.41). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99). No publication bias was detected in the meta-analysis (<i>P</i> = 0.62).ConclusionCEUS demonstrates significant value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"461-469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241297201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOvarian cancer has been reported to be the eighth most common cancer among women worldwide.PurposeTo assess the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Material and MethodsA comprehensive search of scientific literature databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI, was conducted from their inception to November 2019 to identify relevant studies on the use of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were retrieved and analyzed using Stata 15.0.ResultsAfter rigorous screening, a total of 15 high-quality clinical studies encompassing 934 patients with ovarian cancer, comprising 969 ovarian tumors (403 malignant tumors and 566 benign tumors), were included in the analysis. Data analysis revealed significant correlations between CEUS and various diagnostic indices for ovarian tumors: the combined SEN and SPE were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90-0.96), respectively, and the combined LR+ and LR- were 14.07 (95% CI = 9.46-20.92) and 0.08 (95% CI = 0.05-0.13), respectively, with a combined DOR of 185.15 (95% CI = 93.31-367.41). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99). No publication bias was detected in the meta-analysis (P = 0.62).ConclusionCEUS demonstrates significant value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声造影对卵巢癌的诊断价值:荟萃分析。
据报道,瓦里安癌是全球第八大最常见的女性癌症。目的探讨超声造影(CEUS)对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值。材料与方法综合检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、万方、中国知网等科学文献数据库自成立至2019年11月,寻找超声造影在卵巢良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的相关研究。敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、阳性和阴性似然比(LR+/LR-)、诊断优势比(DORs)及其相应的95%置信区间(CIs)使用Stata 15.0进行检索和分析。结果经过严格筛选,共纳入15项高质量临床研究934例卵巢癌患者,其中卵巢肿瘤969例(恶性肿瘤403例,良性肿瘤566例)。资料分析显示CEUS与卵巢肿瘤的各项诊断指标有显著相关性:SEN和SPE的联合值分别为0.93 (95% CI = 0.88-0.96)和0.93 (95% CI = 0.90-0.96), LR+和LR-的联合值分别为14.07 (95% CI = 9.46-20.92)和0.08 (95% CI = 0.05-0.13), DOR的联合值为185.15 (95% CI = 93.31-367.41)。总体受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.98 (95% CI = 0.96 ~ 0.99)。meta分析未发现发表偏倚(P = 0.62)。结论超声造影对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的诊断和鉴别诊断有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
Hip fracture detection on radiographs using an artificial intelligence-based support tool: a diagnostic accuracy study. Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis: a single-center study. Subtype-tailored endovascular management of basilar trunk aneurysms: safety, efficacy, and technical insights from a cohort of 33 patients. Evaluating the MRI-based clear cell likelihood score: is it clinically adequate for predicting clear cell carcinoma? The role of interdisciplinary collaboration and artificial intelligence in radiology residency education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1